I've been reading posts both here and elsewhere about various ways and means of getting good google rankings. However, no one seems to be sure beyond guesswork what works and what doesn't.
From my own observations and thoughts, I have a feeling that a lot of what worked before will be of much less relevance than before.
Content: I think this is going to be the most important thing to consider. Apparently google likes lengthy copy so may well penalise shorter articles. Personally I don't think this makes sense as people don't read lengthy articles online. However, it does make spun articles more easy to detect and also means that people will have to put more effort into their articles.
Backlinks: I honestly think that these are going to be devalued significantly by google. There are now too many ways that marketers can pay for backlinks which is not the reason that google used to like them. If you think about it, unless you are a big site, you probably wouldn't get any natural links for a few months. I've noticed when I've linked to a site,I've dropped back a page or two.
So, tired of all the techniques, I've decided to really focus on quality and length for my next 5 - 10 hubs and see if that brings about any improvement - I'll let you know.
I am just going to throw this straight out, it's my opinion, but it worked for me.
(1) Write on low competition topics, you will get ranked higher easier. Note, these may have lower revenue potential such as lower CPM.
(2) Writing for higher competition topics like real estate, losing weight, etc.. will mean more revenue potential, but it will be VERY hard to rank higher. Backlinks are very important in this case, while they are less, or not needed for lower competition keywords.
I was able to hit a record 10,000+ views last week, on mostly low competition keywords/topics. Now, if it was not for the sub domains, HP ad program, and whatever Google did, this would not of happen so suddenly.
But I can assure, my higher competitive keywords did not get a big break. The traffic on them barely went up. Why? I did no backlinking for them
Thanks David .. I do generally go for low competition keywords and for some sites I've done and a few recent hubs, I've tended to be on the second page which isn't bad but that one extra page makes a big difference to the number of visits and therefore clicks. I'm increasingly uncertain if backlinks are the way to go to improve the ranking .. let's be honest, anyone can now get backlinks if they throw a bit of money at it so that doesn't really give it extra credibility.
If Google are true to their word that it is quality they are looking for then I think a good quantity of text without keyword stuffing and copy that makes sense when read is going to be the key thing .. how they do that I don't know, but most other things they try, people have found a way around them .. so I may well be wrong but my instinct says that if we choose low competition keywords and write well and a decent amount, we may well find we do better ... this isn't scientific and I may waste a lot of time on my next hubs trying to write some really goods ones rather than 'targetting' the keyword but I think it's worth a shot and see what happens.
Yes, people and companies can buy backlinks, but I believe Google will penalize anyone who is getting a massive amount of them in a short period of time..
I actually though about buying backlinks for a hub to see if I could get it to rank.
Some hubbers abide by getting backlinks, and some even buy them, but do not overuse them all at one time.
I'm honestly not sure David if they are good or bad but I have noticed hubs dropping soon after adding a link though that could be part of the google dance. Also I'm surprised how many pages get a ton ten ranking with zero backlinks so I think for the purposes of experimentation that I won't aim for any with the nexxt ten hubs including the one I;ve just posted with 800 words .. a record for me :-)
I'm still not convinced by the quality argument. Can computers assess quality ? For example "investing in the stock market is not something you should approach lightly" compared to "lightly investing in the approach stock is not something you should market" - woudl a Google computer know the difference ?
Well you can depend that google has some pretty powerful software sorting through this so it probably would pick that up and I'm sure they will head more and more in that direction. You can also bet that the big boys have been complaining that their sites are on page 4 or wherever when page one is full of SEO dross. But like I say, I'm no expert .. I'm trying this policy out for ten hubs to see how they fare. To be honest, though it's a pain writing longer hubs, I;d rather do that than have to fiddle about with tricks and tips to get ranked .. But we'll see .. I could be seriously wrong here
by Isaac Asante 4 years ago
Hi guys,For a while I've been using Google's Keyword Tool to research high-paying keywords and their estimate monthly traffic. Normally, what I do is that I look for Low competition keywords with around 1,000 monthly searches, and less than a million results in Google Search, then I look at the...
by Michael Willis 5 years ago
This is the worst traffic I have seen since I began with HP. The NFL season is my money maker, or it was. This year's traffic is non-existent. If this is the way at HP now, I guess it is time to move everything somewhere else before the season is over. I am use to several thousand a day on weekends...
by WhatTheHub 6 years ago
I was deciding on revamping my Oil Shale hub. When looking through the Google Keywords Tool, I had found that A LOT of the keywords I would LIKE to use are mostly Medium to High Completion.Usual because the generic term "oil companies" ranks LOW, with 1.2 million in searches a...
by Susannah Birch 3 years ago
1. Ignore the number of followers & internal views. 2. Ignore hubber and hub scores. 3. Write, write, write to build up a base of quality content.4. Write on low competition topics so views increase with time. 5. Stop promoting so much when you could be writing. It's a waste of time unless you...
by Susannah Birch 7 years ago
I keep seeing people making these mistakes so I thought I'd just point them out:1. When doing a search for keywords make sure you select "exact" not "broad." Broad brings in any keyword searches that feature your keywords ANYWHERE in the search sentence. Exact will match how...
by David 470 8 years ago
When using Google's keyword tool, is it better to look for high or low competition words? I typed in a phrase and got 9900 monthly searches with low comp. Would that be considered good? The phrase was the same as I typed except by one word. Everything else was relevant to the phrase..
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|