ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • History & Archaeology»
  • History of the Modern Era

Two Very Different Founding Fathers...Jefferson and Franklin

Updated on August 9, 2010

Ben Franklin

Thomas Jefferson

 Two Very Different Founding Fathers—Franklin and Jefferson


   Benjamin Franklin was the elder statesman of the Constitutional Convention. He was one of the few founding fathers who was already internationally famous. He was the leader of the host delegation and looked up to by his peers. To many, he represented the spirit of scientific advancement for a new age. Although he was ill at the time of the convention, his status was such that it was important he make an appearance.


   Due to his failing health, his participation was somewhat limited. He offered no new propositions or suggestions. He was basically willing to accept any idea which he believed would lead to a more effective government. He acted mostly as a calming influence on others, mediating disputes and cooling hot tempers, using the same charm and finesse that he had used in the court of King Louis as the Ambassador to France, when he secured loans from the French government to support the American Revolution.


   Still, his contribution was felt through his past actions. For instance, he had once proposed the idea of proportional representation, an idea which was dismissed at the time. This idea, reborn and reworded, found its way into the Constitution. Also, Franklin was a firm believer in tolerance for religious diversity. Freedom of religion also made its way into the document.


   He favored the use of paper money and used his printing business to print more of it, helping establish the paper currency system that has exited ever since. On a more humanistic note, the same year that the Constitution was signed, Franklin lived up to all his talk of freedom and became the leader of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery.


   Thomas Jefferson was very different from the gregarious Franklin. Though not yet as well known around the world as his elder colleague, the presence of the man who wrote the Declaration of Independence was a virtual necessity at the Constitutional Convention. Basically a quiet man (Called the “Silent Member of Congress”) he was an eloquent writer and preferred to let his pen do his talking.


   Jefferson was a powerful advocate of liberty. He once wrote, “I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man”. He was committed to the establishment of a Constitution that would preserve and protect the freedom of all Americans.


   Like Franklin, he was a strong believer in religious tolerance and had, in fact, passed a bill about it the year before. To Jefferson, freedom of religion went hand in hand with other freedoms.


   Jefferson was a wealthy land owner and as such, represented the privileged class, as opposed to Franklin who came up from the bottom. Franklin was more in touch with the little man, although he was no more committed to championing their rights than Jefferson was.


   Like Franklin, he became an abolitionist, but at a much earlier age. They both spoke out against the prevailing practices of the day and denounced slavery for the inhumane act it was.


   Interestingly, they both had serious reservations about a strong central government. Franklin did not want to completely break ties with England and had once suggested a royally appointed President. He was an imperial thinker who placed the unity of the entire English speaking world above its separate parts.



   As for Jefferson, he was an anti-Federalist and a strong proponent of states rights. He had hoped to limit the authority of the chief executive and leave the individual states to handle their own affairs, only united in times of crisis, such as war. Neither he nor Franklin got what they expected, but in the spirit of compromise, which was a major part of the convention, they accepted the realities of the situation. Franklin commented in a closing speech that, “there are several parts of this of this Constitution which I do not approve, but I am not sure I shall ever approve them.” He further added, “I consent to this Constitution because I expect no better.”   



   So much of what these men gave to the world, from Franklin’s science, to Jefferson’s architectural brilliance and his stirring words immortalized in the Declaration of Independence, remain a part of our culture today. Their dedication to liberty and their ability to look to the future shaped the world as we know it today.




    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Robwrite profile image

      Rob 8 years ago from Oviedo, FL

      Glad you enjoyed it, HH. I enjoy your hubs, too.

    • Hello, hello, profile image

      Hello, hello, 8 years ago from London, UK

      Thank you for writing a superb article. I enjoyed it and learned from it so much

    • profile image

      FreedomChic1776 8 years ago

      Your comment reminded me of my history teacher. He always tried to get us to see the duality of Jefferson the public man and the private man. I think you Jefferson's duality is a prime example of why a man can say and act without necessarily being a hypocrite. Thanks for your response.

    • Robwrite profile image

      Rob 8 years ago from Oviedo, FL

      Hi FreedomChic1776;

      There was clearly a hypocracy in Jefferson's public and private persona. In public, Jefferson was a staunch abolitionist. He called slavery a "deplorable act", an "Abomination", "a blot of Freedom" and "A moral evil". He wrote that the abolition of slavery was necessary for the ultimate emancipation of human nature. He advocated kinder treatment of slaves. He had written a section in "the Declaration of Independence" about ending slavery but was over-ruled by the southern delegates and forced to drop the section in order to reach an agreement.

      On the other hand, he did own slaves all his life. He was very rich and had many slaves on his estate. Many of them were his lovers. He may have treated them well but they were still slaves none-the-less.

      Jefferson was very conscious of his notariety and postion, and as long as slavery existed, he wasn't going to be without a resource that his peers had. He profited off it even while condemning it.

      Its hard to reconcile Jefferson's contradictory actions, but his official political position was that he was part of the anti-slavery movement.

    • profile image

      FreedomChic1776 8 years ago

      I found your take on the two different men interesting. I am curious though about Jefferson being a strong abolitionist considering that he owned several slaves. What do you think?