jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (6 posts)

What is the age of earth ??

  1. JKR1105 profile image59
    JKR1105posted 5 years ago

    What is the age of earth ??

  2. scottcgruber profile image78
    scottcgruberposted 5 years ago

    4.54 billion years, give or take 50 million or so. This has been verified by radiometric dating of Earth rocks and meteorites.

  3. Sue St. Clair profile image71
    Sue St. Clairposted 5 years ago

    Science does not know the 'true age' of the earth with 100% confidence. Since true science deals with what is observable, there is no observational data. Whatever answer you believe will be taken on faith.

    If you assume that  all the geologic processes which are occurring now (rain, sediment deposits, etc.) have always occurred at the same rate, you will have one answer. This is called 'uniformitarianism'. If you believe that there have been major changes in those processes, the answer will be different. Scientists in previous generations believed that geological cataclysms changed the earth and those processes. This is termed "cataclysmic geology'.

    If you subscribe to Biblical accounts, the earth is about 6000 years old.

    If you believe that radiometric dating is accurate, then you arrive at an answer of millions if not billions of years, depending on which method and calculations you use.  Like many algebraic type equations, there are several unknowns and assumptions in the formulas. Some of the scientists are less than honest and do not tell the public about all the unknown variables. Remember how frustrating algebra problems were to solve when you had just two unknown variables?  Although radiometric dating sound impressive with all the numbers, it requires faith in their ability to crunch numbers based on assumptions. No one has seen uranium emit radioactivity for all those thousands of years. Consider how the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been rebuilt when the scientific experts claimed that the area would be radioactive for hundreds of years.

    So, it is a matter of which system you put your faith in as to how old you consider the earth to be.

    1. scottcgruber profile image78
      scottcgruberposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      No, sorry. The age of the Earth is fact, not opinion. So are the decay rates of radioactive isotopes. You don't have to watch them for millions of years, just as a cop doesn't have to watch you for an hour to catch you doing 70 miles per hour.

    2. Sue St. Clair profile image71
      Sue St. Clairposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The decay rates are based on assumptions of constant decay rates, no contamination by anything (including water), and ideal conditions at time zero. When you are talking 4,500,000,000 years, that is a LOT of room for error, speculation and opinion.

  4. scottcgruber profile image78
    scottcgruberposted 5 years ago

    Over much of human history, the Age of the Earth was determined by myth-based timelines. The scientific revolution of the 18th and 19th centuries changed all this. As naturalists began to understand the principles of geology, the old creation timelines no longer fit. This article examines how we arrived at our current understanding of our 4.57 billion-year-old planet. read more

 
working