4.54 billion years, give or take 50 million or so. This has been verified by radiometric dating of Earth rocks and meteorites.
Science does not know the 'true age' of the earth with 100% confidence. Since true science deals with what is observable, there is no observational data. Whatever answer you believe will be taken on faith.
If you assume that all the geologic processes which are occurring now (rain, sediment deposits, etc.) have always occurred at the same rate, you will have one answer. This is called 'uniformitarianism'. If you believe that there have been major changes in those processes, the answer will be different. Scientists in previous generations believed that geological cataclysms changed the earth and those processes. This is termed "cataclysmic geology'.
If you subscribe to Biblical accounts, the earth is about 6000 years old.
If you believe that radiometric dating is accurate, then you arrive at an answer of millions if not billions of years, depending on which method and calculations you use. Like many algebraic type equations, there are several unknowns and assumptions in the formulas. Some of the scientists are less than honest and do not tell the public about all the unknown variables. Remember how frustrating algebra problems were to solve when you had just two unknown variables? Although radiometric dating sound impressive with all the numbers, it requires faith in their ability to crunch numbers based on assumptions. No one has seen uranium emit radioactivity for all those thousands of years. Consider how the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been rebuilt when the scientific experts claimed that the area would be radioactive for hundreds of years.
So, it is a matter of which system you put your faith in as to how old you consider the earth to be.
No, sorry. The age of the Earth is fact, not opinion. So are the decay rates of radioactive isotopes. You don't have to watch them for millions of years, just as a cop doesn't have to watch you for an hour to catch you doing 70 miles per hour.
The decay rates are based on assumptions of constant decay rates, no contamination by anything (including water), and ideal conditions at time zero. When you are talking 4,500,000,000 years, that is a LOT of room for error, speculation and opinion.
Over much of human history, the Age of the Earth was determined by myth-based timelines. The scientific revolution of the 18th and 19th centuries changed all this. As naturalists began to understand the principles of geology, the old creation timelines no longer fit. This article examines how we arrived at our current understanding of our 4.57 billion-year-old planet. read more
by thetruthhurts2009 9 years ago
Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy. If want to continue to believe you come from a rocky soup. You can stop reading and leave now, but if you seek the truth you are most welcome to...
by Kathryn L Hill 4 years ago
Is Natural Selection in Evolution the result of happenstance?Are the Laws of Nature directed in an arbitrary way?Was the Big Bang a random accident?Was Hydrogen created out of Nothing?Were the first copied pairs of DNA accidental?Was the Destruction of the Dinosaurs an accident?Obviously, the...
by Randy Godwin 14 months ago
Why do you not believe in Global Warming/Climate Change?I have no doubt our earth is warming at an alarming rate. One of the reasons I think this is because of the photo I included with the question. Otzi--the Iceman--was frozen over 5000 years ago and has remained that way through all sorts of...
by slaffery 10 months ago
At what age do you think a child should be able to hold a two-way conversation?
by Queirdkus Ω Ibidem 6 years ago
Assuming that you're starting from zero belief (i.e. no religion, no philosophy, no psychological principles, etc.) and that one’s belief actually shapes one’s reality, what would you consider a worthwhile belief to start with? Why? (Belief in the power to make the best choice of...
by Alexander A. Villarasa 3 years ago
As engines go, nothing could compare to the power of imagination and intuition in rapidly progressing the trajectory of man's existence and persistence. Albert Einstein himself said the following: (1) "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but IMAGINATION." (2)...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|