JFK, Bill Clinton and the National Archive releases, have they given us more questions than answers.
Pre the release of these archive gems, no matter which article, magazine or book you may have chosen, you would have found all the usual runners and riders. Time I believe to shine a bright new light on Camelot. For those who continue to search for the truth, what questions have been answered ? What new questions should we be asking ?
While I am content with the answers we have been given, there is a large segment of the population that just do not trust anybody, or at least they say that so they can start an argument.
The only two questions are:
1. Why was the President riding in an open convertibl?
That was the way things were done.
2. Was Lee Harvey Oswald mentally ill and if so, would he had ever gone to trial.
3. Why did Oswald do it. Jack Ruby kept us from finding out.
I was in the seventh grade when Kennedy was shot. I watched his brother get killed on television. I remember Martin Luther King being killed.
I was a news reporter during Watergate, I was not covering it, but watched it closely.
I was in the lottery for Vietnam, but got a high number. I would had gone if drafted.
For each of those events there are hundreds of conspiracy theories, none of which have been proved or verify.
It has been more than 50 yeas since JFK was shot. Give it a rest.
I can understand that America has probably had it's fill of trying to get to the truth about JFK, but here in the UK the eternal flame burns bright. Not looking for a conspiracy theory, still searching for the truth. Nice to hear your point of view.
A jury of 12 can convict a person of a crime based on the evidence presented and still be wrong. Absolute answers are hard to find. The U.S. dropped the Atomic Bomb on Japan. Was there an agreement with Russia to do so--I do not agree, some do.
I agree, absolute answers can be very hard to find. For me, the search goes on, perhaps when I have looked at ALL the new information I may, like you, find myself content. US/Russia agreement, not enough knowledge on the situation for me to comment.
I appreciate your right to look and question, but after so many years, and all the major players are dead, it is hard to find credible answers. There are still people question who killed Lincoln. Future will be harder--to much info, too many opinions
Point well made, but this old british bulldog still has this worry monkey sitting on his shoulder. As you say, 'so much information'. My quest will continue. God Bless.
by ngureco 7 years ago
Do The People Who Ask Questions Here Read The Answers Given To Their Questions?
by Zipper 5 years ago
She didn't know about requests for increased security. She had no answers for any of the questions other than what they are doing now to make it more safe. The Democrats praised her and the Republicans asked serious questions. What is wrong with this? I retired from...
by Susie Lehto 23 months ago
The New York Times is one of the mainstream news outlets that has gone further left-wing than the others with out-right lies, so I am wondering how they will cover this story. They cannot keep covering up for the Clinton Crime Family and save face. This is a good report by the NYP. ...
by John Wilson 24 months ago
How can Hillary be "for" women when her husband is a womanizer who's lied throughout their marriage?I find it odd, that so many women are for Hillary Clinton, when her husband is accused of being a rapist and of having numerous affairs.Hillary always says the accuser is lying, though...
by LoliHey 21 months ago
Should they take down or at least archive questions that have been asked on here years ago?I mean, some of the questions are good, but there are 400 answers or so, and they were asked years ago, so I doubt the person who asked the question is really going to read all of them, or still cares about...
by Susie Lehto 11 months ago
This articles was publish Oct 9 2016."INTERNAL STRATEGY DOCUMENTS and emails among Clinton staffers shed light on friendly and highly useful relationships between the campaign and various members of the U.S. media, as well as the campaign’s strategies for manipulating those relationships.The...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|