What is the best way to evaluate teaching practices?
We have different ways of evaluating teachers' instructional design, lesson plans and pedagogy. Please share some concrete examples from your context which you think works.
If you look at it from a student's point of view it comes down did the teacher cover the curriculum required for me to be prepared for the exam whether that is some state exam, real estate, stock broker series 7, or standardized tests.
Having said that teachers can only go over the course, ask questions, answer questions, and explain why certain areas are key takeaways.
Ultimately it come down to the students being proactive when it comes to learning, doing assignments, and preparing for quizzes and exams.
It also helps in parents are engaged with teachers throughout the year to make sure everyone is aware of the progress or lack there of being made.
Naturally if most of a teacher's students are failing the standardized tests the teacher is going to be called to the mat. This holds true for any coach whose team loses constantly. They get rid of the coach and not the team.
This accountability issue has led many to accuse teachers of "teaching to the test" as oppose to concepts and approaches to reasoning. If we're measuring on test results what's do we expect?
I would employ the tenants of Revelation Theory of Learning (RTL). There are seven of these. If all 7 are observed during a specific lesson, namely:
(2) Effective Visuals
(3) Effective Language
(4) Association of curriculum to students...
(5) Technology that is Interactive
(6) Observation of learner by instructor that is frequent
(7) Non-biased delivery of instruction (Modern Socratic Method of Instruction) and there is a complete absence of the detractors; specifically,
(1) sophisticated language
There is a check-sheet for this to make the measurement of this relatively easy.
Thanks for introducing me to RTL, will research more on it. Just wondering on a couple of points, (a) what if all 7 elements are not happening on the same day (b) how to measure observation of learner and unbiased instruction?
If an instructor is not utilizing all 7, instruction will not be optimized. Some will not learn; thus, not pay attention and will get into trouble. The instructor must be witnessed (b) observing his students and (c) employing the M. Socratic Method.
by Adamowen4 years ago
Do you think test scores are a good indication of a school's competency?
by EDU 1017 years ago
How do YOU feel about standardized testing? My main interest is how many parents use the test scores to determine school placement for their child (and how they achieve that placement), but feel free to talk about any...
by Sheila8 years ago
My first day in a middle school class, two of the kids had knives, a couple were making out at the back of the room, one kid was standing on a desk ,and another proceeded to tell me every dirty word he could think...
by OLYHOOCH6 years ago
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama said Monday that students should take fewer standardized tests and school performance should be measured in other ways. Too much testing makes education boring for kids, he...
by fitmom5 years ago
Should a teacher's pay be related to their students scores on standardized tests?Many states have gone to merit based pay for teachers whereby they pay teachers based on how their students perform on standardized tests....
by Paul Richard Kuehn14 months ago
Must teachers always entertain students in the classroom? Why or why not?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.