ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Entertainment and Media»
  • Television & TV Shows

Bear Grylls: Survivor or Conniver?

Updated on October 13, 2015
Source

Bear Grylls, star of popular former Discovery Channel television series, "Man vs. Wild," and current CBS television series, "Running Wild with Bear Grylls," is not your average, ordinary proclaimed survival expert. Unlike so many other proclaimed survival experts who have demonstrated their skills on television: Les Stroud on "Survivorman," Joseph Teti and Matt Graham on "Dual Survival," and Mykel Hawke and Ruth England on "Man, Woman, Wild," to name a few, watching Bear struggle to survive in the wild on camera rarely, if ever leads to a yawn by viewers. The places he ends up in, the heights he jumps from, the things he eats, and the stunts he performs never seize to keep his fans on their toes throughout every one of his televised adventures. But can programs so entertaining really qualify as reality television?

In 2007 former survival consultant of "Man vs. Wild," Mark Weinert, indicated to "The Times of London" as well to several other big newspapers that Grylls had spent various nights in hotels or motels while filming episodes of "Man vs. Wild" in which he was portrayed as being outdoors the entire time. The Discovery Channel later admitted that some "isolated elements" of the show were not "natural to the environment," and Grylls himself confessed, and apologized for some misleading portrayals of his survival experiences aired on television. These revelations, and confessions ignited a surge of criticism regarding the realism of "Man vs. Wild" episodes.

Despite these attacks, Grylls' popularity remained stable, his shows' ratings never once plummeting, until it was eventually cancelled in 2012, allegedly due to contract disputes. So why weren't his fans outraged enough by this to begin boycotting his show? Being deceived is not something people generally take very lightly. Why did the public continue tuning into Bear Grylls' adventures knowing they'd been lied to? I personally can think of two good reasons:

(1) They already knew it, and they didn't care. Any competent human being could easily have seen his shows were not entirely realistic. Anyone who's been in the wilderness for prolonged periods of time knows you don't just stumble over things that assist with outdoor survival, or make for a more exciting adventure, the way Bear oftentimes did in his programs. If you were dropped into some random location of a South American jungle, do you really think you would just happen to discover a deep, dark cavern, come face-to-face with a number of rare and deadly predators, and find everything you need to build a raft to sail down the Amazon all on your first day of hiking? If you're really naive enough to think that things like this can actually happen to a man on every filmed outdoor adventure he goes on, (as they did in "Man vs. Wild"), you probably think pro-wrestlers are just superhuman enough to take beatings that would otherwise send any average human being to their grave. It's just entertainment! It might have been a bit deceiving to have referred to it as reality television, but anyone of average intelligence could have seen right through that. Even people who had never been in the woods before had Survivorman's host, Les Stroud, at that time to display the reality of what being lost in the woods was all about. Nothing of much excitement ever really happens. It's like watching an amateur film of a man camping along a river. What would you rather watch: a film of a man on a camping trip, or Indiana Jones? Bear Grylls was, and is an entertainer, and a damn good one at that, and good fiction typically always sells better than the truth.

(2) What he did on camera was real. It may not have all been necessary for his survival, and a lot of it was likely rehearsed, and setup, but in addition to being extremely fun to watch, there's no evidence to refute the fact that everything Bear Grylls did on camera in his survival shows was real. It wasn't like a movie, with special effects, stunt doubles, and camera tricks to enhance its appeal. Bear really did eat all those disgusting creatures he was displayed eating on camera. He really made all those high jumps into water. He really ventured through all those dangerous places. A lot of those things he did were unimaginable in my view. As such, he could have spent every night he wasn't being filmed in a luxury hotel suite for all I care, and I'd still watch his shows with admiration on account of everything he actually did on camera. The world had never seen a real life character quite like this. We had purely fictional characters, like Rambo, but I think people always just assumed nobody was actually like that in real life, until Bear Grylls came along. Bear did the craziest things imaginable, and there's no evidence to indicate these actions weren't real. The same can be said about the tips he provided for survival. His programs displayed a lot of good tips for the average outdoors men and women. While I doubt anyone would ever try jumping eighty feet into freezing water, or sucking the juice from elephant dung just because they saw Bear do it on TV, the information displayed in his shows involving building fires and shelters, and finding safe things to eat were genuinely helpful to average people seeking advise on surviving in the wilderness. The reality of the things Bear did on camera, and the survival tips he provided are a second good reason why his popularity has never dwindled in the midst of attacks on the genuineness of his programs.

In conclusion, after watching so many different survival shows since "Man vs. Wild" was cancelled, including "Naked and Afraid," "Alone," "Ultimate Survival," and many others, I can still honestly say that none of them rival watching reruns of Bear Grylls. His programs consisted of the perfect combination of surviving and conniving to make for entertainment one can never get bored with. I for one think his show was the best program the Discovery Channel ever aired.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)