ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: “Baywatch”

Updated on May 29, 2020
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Baywatch

Theatrical Release: 5/25/2017
Theatrical Release: 5/25/2017 | Source

Synopsis

Lifeguard tryouts are about to begin. Mitch (Dwayne Johnson) is the lifeguard's Lieutenant and he has become somewhat of a local legend at the bay. His bravery, and his consistency to save lives in an epic fashion has made him the local legend that he is, but he does not do what he does for the fame. Mitch takes his responsibility very seriously, and he leads his team of lifeguards as such.

Mitch and his team, which includes CJ (Kelly Rohrbach) and Stephanie (Ilfenesh Hadera), are overseeing the lifeguard tryouts and training the newbies, all while simultaneously watching out for the lives and property of everyone on the beach. Former Olympic Swimming Gold Medalist Matt Brody (Zac Efron), Summer (Alexandra Daddario) and Ronnie (Jon Bass) make up the eager new team of recruits. However, they will soon discover that being a lifeguard at this beach means more than just saving people from drowning. As multiple deaths start occurring at the beach, the team of lifeguards must learn how the victims are connected and must stop whoever is responsible before more lives are lost.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Training (+4pts)
Victoria Leeds (-6pts)
Comedy (+6pts)
The Plot (-6pts)
Rescues (+4pts)
Genre (-6pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then awarded for each Pro and taken away for each Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points ranging from 0-10 allowing me to convey to you how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: Training (+4pts)

This is one of the times where the movie worked really well. The movie gave us three newbies, each with different motivations for being there. They were all essentially thrown into the fire, as the chaos on this beach unfolded. I liked watching how each of these characters responded differently, while trying to find their place on the team.

The training was a little ridiculous, but it worked for a comedy such as this one. I also enjoyed the comedy that came from the lack of experience that some of these characters had. It was light-hearted, and I felt that each of these newbies wanted it, so it was easy to get invested in their goal to be a part of this team. This part of the story did not last all that long, but I enjoyed it while it was happening.

Source

Con: Victoria Leeds (-6pts)

This character, played by Priyanka Chopra, was probably my least favorite part of this movie. She was the primary antagonist of the movie, but the character just did not work for me. She had terriblly cheesy and cringe-worthy one-liners, and her story-line was very predictable, so she was not intimidating, because I knew what to expect from the character. This character was severely one-dimensional, and was nothing more than a lazy plot device.

This movie could have been a lot better if the antagonist was intimidating and made for a more interesting story. Unfortunately, I never feared that Victoria Leeds would come out of this victorious, and the story surrounding her was incredibly typical. She was bad, because she wanted money and power. She was bad, because the writers wanted her to be bad. The premise of this movie worked, but the writers got lazy with the story's protagonist, and the movie suffered for it.

Source

Pro: Comedy (+6pts)

This movie had some fun comedic moments and lines, but it also had some ridiculous attempts at comedy that ended up falling short. Most of the comedy that worked involves Dwayne Johnson and Jon Bass. With Dwayne Johnson, the comedy came from great one-liner insults directed at Zac Efron, or action that was so over-the-top and ridiculous that it actually became funny. After having seen this movie, I cannot think of a better actor to have played Mitch than Dwayne Johnson. Dwayne Johnson looked the part and he played his character well, but the other main source of comedy came from Jon Bass. I did not think the actor brought anything incredible to the role, but he was an effective comedic relief, with most of the comedy coming from the character's misfortune. None of it had me on the floor laughing or anything, but the character definitely made the movie more entertaining.

Source

Con: The Plot (-6pts)

One area where this movie was severely lacking was the plot. After the first five to ten minutes, I knew exactly how the entire rest of the movie would go (as far as major plot points were concerned). First there was the poor character development. Each of the main characters (played by Dwayne Johnson, Zac Efron, Jon Bass, and Kelly Rohrbach) had really predictable story-lines. The rest of the characters got no significant character development whatsoever.

Poor character development is never a good thing, but the filmmakers can at least partially make up for it if the overall plot of the movie is decent enough. Unfortunately for this movie, the filmmakers delivered an overall plot that was just as poorly written as the character development. It was incredibly predictable, and felt like about a hundred other action-comedies that I had seen before. It just felt like nothing special, which mixed with all of the ridiculous and cheesy moments, made for a movie that felt a lot longer than it actually was, and was unable to keep me interested after the training was over.

Source

Pro: Rescues (+4pts)

This was another area in which I thought that the movie worked really well. There were some cool rescue sequences that mixed awesome action sequences with some cheesy-action humor. These sequences show the experienced lifeguards saving lives in fun-to-watch ways. Then there were the new recruits who struggled to keep up, which provided some decent comedy. While the plot was predictable, the "rescue missions" were each unique from one another, which helped keep the movie feeling fresh. While I do not think that this was enough to make up for the lack of a decent plot or decent character development, I think that these sequences were some of the better and more memorable parts of the movie.

Source

Con: Genre (-6pts)

This movie could have been a great comedy or a great action-comedy, but its downfall was trying to be both simultaneously. I know that may sound weird but a good action-comedy has plenty of action and is sprinkled with some jokes throughout. A comedy can have some action, but its focus is on the humor. The filmmakers of this movie tried to have an action focused plot with cool action sequences, but also tried to be a laugh-per-minute type of experience.

The result was an action movie, in which the filmmakers never took the action seriously. However, the cheesy action plot took a lot of focus away from the comedy. On top of that, the plot was not even good. The filmmakers just tried to balance too much and they ended up failing at doing so.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Terrible
65-69
D-
Bad
60-64
F
Garbage
0-59
Source

Grade: C- (71pts)

Baywatch was a movie that ended up being barely watchable. It had some good moments in the form of cool action, rescue sequences, humorous insults from Dwayne Johnson's character toward Zac Efron's character, a "training" storyline and comedy at the expense of Jon Bass' character. While all of those things are good and made the movie more entertaining, it all together was not enough to make up for the incredibly weak and predictable plot in which the filmmakers could not pick one genre to stick to. The antagonist was a one-note, cheesy, and boring character, which mixed with a weak plot to make for a predictable movie that felt like it was going on forever. I can safely say that this movie was not terrible, but it is certainly not worth your time. It had some laughs and cool moments, but ultimately could not overcome the poor writing.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)