What should be the criteria for a journalist? Why some are biased?
Some of the leading media anchors are highly educated, but lacks sense of understanding the society. Some of them are even unaware of histories and heritages. So, what quality journalist must have?
Fifty years ago, most journalists wanted to see the world. And though they had a liberal bias, that only slightly colored their reporting.
Today, they become journalists to change the world, not only open in their bias but letting it affect what stories they report and don't report and how they report it. This is how you get liberal figures of whom you hear no wrong, and if corruption or bad things are reported, it is written in a way to blame the conservatives. The political message thus trumps the truth.
Good journalists must set aside their biases and report the facts that are important to the story and to society.
There are few "journalists" on TV today. The news programs that were on the networks for decades have been skewed into "shows" in which various "celebrities" merely "chat" about current issues. Historically, TV newsmen reported the news objectively ("Just the facts.") Opinion was limited to special reports labeled "analysis." Until recently there were TV channels that leaned right or left, but more recently virtually all TV shows are biased toward the right -- especially so-called Fox "news?"
Everyone has bias; that, I expect. When writing editorials and columns, I expect the journalist to write from their point of view.
Reporting hard news is a different situation. They should be professional enough not to interject their personal, biased commentary.
Part of it is educational indoctrination. Surveys have shown an extreme imbalance of hard "leftists" teaching journalism, so no surprise that the next generation of journalists are even farther "left."
There is no effort to "understand" society, and history in education has become revisionist history, often teaching untruths and manipulated. Even the concept of critical thinking has been redefined.
This is why non-mainstream media has risen to such heights. People no longer trust the mainstream media. Unfortunately, a lot of the non-mainstream media is even worse.
Not sure how that can be solved at this point.
by Sarah C Nason5 years ago
Why do people keep using biased mainstream media as their only news source?News channels such as CNN, MSNBC, FOX, etc are clearly biased and don't give all the information, yet I know countless people that use those as...
by Dennis L. Page5 years ago
Why have mainstream media outlets refused to report on the Exxon oil spill in Arkansas?There was initial reporting on the ruptured pipeline and oil spill in an Arkansas residential area, but as quick as it was reported...
by ahorseback4 months ago
Gee , that's too bad ,....... That simply informs anyone with any brains that the mainstream media cannot stand being unable to filter in or out their own agenda to press room releases ? If the...
by TheWatchman7 years ago
I gotta get this off my chest....Networks like FOX and even CNN absolutely reek of heavy bias in their reporting...i cant believe most people watch and accept what these networks say as fact..but i know there are some...
by ahorseback14 months ago
Not the sensationalizing "face -book " mentality of todays mainstream news media . Once , there was a time when selling the headline was the profiteering, business method of...
by Hxprof18 months ago
Why is the mainstream media ignoring the wikileaks Clinton email dumps?The media is devoting little time to the wikileaks Clinton email dumps. Why is this?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.