Why does the United States have an Electoral College?
Every 4 years, Americans vote for a president. After the people's votes are counted, one candidate is the winner in each state. Then that candidate wins all the state's 'electors'. The electors from each of the 50 states are counted up like points. Whoever wins 270 electors becomes President. So, even if someone who is running for President, gets more votes in the entire U.S.A. the other person running for President can win. This is wrong. It should be one person, one vote.
The reason is we were founded as a democratically elected republic not a democracy. If we used a pure democracy then the population centers like NY & LA would contol the country and the interest of smaller states would get no representation. And generally speaking different regions of the country have often vastly different concerns & needs. And in some cases values. In a pure democracy, it is simply far easier for the majority to impose tyranny on the minority. Imagine living in Rhode Island and paying Federal income taxes. But the elected officials simply would not need your vote. So all of your tax revenue would be redirected back to NY, LA, & Chicago. Our system is flawed, but it's still way better than a pure democracy.
Personally, I would like to see electoral votes allocated at a county level rather than a state level. If you live in a conservative county in NY, national elected officials are not interested in your concerns. They already have the state wrapped up. Likewise if you live in a liberal county in Texas.
My views over the electoral college have changed back and forth over the years. I think I am at the final answer, that while one man-one vote would be ideal, it is nor practical. The reasons stated by LandmarkWeath are very good. New York and California would control the elections. The rest of us would never see the candidates.
In most elections, the person getting the highest popular vote has been chosen by the electoral college. We had that fiasco with the Bush-Gore elections and there were earlier elections.
One problem is that each state has their own voting laws, different hours for voting, different times to vote absentee, different ballots (electronic vs. paper with hanging chads) and a lot of other differences. I use to cover vote tallies for elections when I was a reporter. Many of the poll commissioners were elderly and had trouble reading the totals off the back of the machines. We have newer machines in LA now, but some states are still using paper ballots or punch ballots.
I guess the simple answer is that the electoral college is a check against the popular vote. If we depended on the popular vote, if there was ever a protest in an election, it would take a recount of all the votes in all the states and we would still wind up in court.
While neither one of us may like the system, I believe it is the best we can do.
Agreed, I just still think it should be electoral votes allocated at the county level. To me that is a slightly better representation of a democracy with a check on the power of the majority.
In LA we have 64 parishes (counties) and the population varies greatly. You would end up with a huge number of delegates and would increase the cost considerably. Delegates for states are determined by population and elected by the people.
I am sure there could be away to streamline that cost eventually. I am thinking each state keeps the same total of current votes. But then allocates them per county so winning a state doesn't grant you all the votes.
I don't see any gain. The law states, "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Sens. and Reps. ...." The number is set. States chose the method.
i guess the gain is if you're in a conservative county in NY, why bother even particpating in national elections. And the same is true for a liberal county in Texas. The dominant party isnt concerned about your needs as the minority in the state.
It happens in almost every state where there is a large population area and a less densely populated area in another. If we did as you suggested there is a greater chance that the candidate with the highest popular vote might lose the popular vote.
The national popular vote wouldn't change, just allocate electoral votes partially across the state based on population of counties.For example you might win 27out of the31 electoral votes in NY. That would make the smaller county partially relevant
It has been a good discussion. But the fed allocate votes. Getting all the states to agree would be hard since the fed could not force them.
That's where I think the states should have the descretion on how to allocate their awarded votes on a county basis. i wouldn't want the fed to have that power. Give the state a # and let them divide it up accordingly. Probably never happen.
by ptosis 11 years ago
"A constitutional amendment, which requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress (or a Convention under Article V of the Constitution) and ratification in three-fourths of all fifty states, would be required." - https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti … e/GZQtFSPVCheck out...
by Credence2 11 years ago
excerpt from a recent article"After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change the rules to make it easier for them to win.From Wisconsin to Pennsylvania, GOP officials who control legislatures in states that supported President Barack Obama are considering...
by ga anderson 5 years ago
Let me channel Jake for a moment...BIG BREAKING NEWS! Bombshell announcement! A CONSTITUTIONAL crisis!Deleware has voted to join eleven other states in awarding their 3 electoral college votes to the national popular vote winner!The votes of state voters in these 12 states no longer matter! YOUR...
by Eric Hubbard 13 years ago
Should the USA go to popular vote instead of the electoral college?
by Mike Russo 7 years ago
People are protesting President Elect Trump? Because Hillary won the popular vote by .3% Trump = 47.4%, Hillary = 47.7%, but she lost the electoral college. That means more people voted for Hillary's platform than for Trump's. The electoral college must go. It is outdated and was for a younger...
by Faith Reaper 7 years ago
I may be a bit naive on this topic, but I believe that my vote should count. I understand the history and all, but I still think one's vote should count, and the candidate who receives the most votes should win. What are your thoughts. Please help me to understand why the...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |