Call of Duty Modern Warfare Vs. Call of Duty World at War

Jump to Last Post 1-16 of 16 discussions (18 posts)
  1. profile image53
    KittyBallsposted 13 years ago

    Hey guys, just wanted to know, which of these two games are your favirote. List the Pro's and Con's for Both Games.

    My personal favirote is World at War, because of the nazi zombies, gave me hours of fun, but the multiplayer wasnt much different, so I just went back to Modern Warfare for Multiplayer. Cant forget the storyline either, can we? Anyways I though the World at War Storyline was a bit too boring, and a bit too hard even on normal setting. But for Modern warfare it was challenging, but not as hard.

    So yeah, List your opinions guys, Thanks.

    1. profile image49
      tagking1109posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      yeah i dont like nazi zombies that much because its pointless of what you're doing all you are doing is killing zombies for hours..... now call of duty modern warfare two is a different story it shows people whats happening in the world right now thats the better thing about mw

  2. brodie8288 profile image56
    brodie8288posted 13 years ago

    Modern Warfare took the Call Of Duty series and turned it on it's that alone may make it seem better than World At War. But the best things about World At War aren't so much flat-out in the open, as they are behind the scenes. It's gritty, it's dark, there's small moments of extreme, unexpected happenings, and personally, I think it's got one of the best sniper levels in any game. I enjoyed the multiplayer maps a tiny bit better on Modern Warfare, but only because I gave that more time than World At War. If I gave WaW a bit more attention upon initial release, I'm sure I would've enjoyed it more.

    So....I like World At War better, if not for the feel, then just for the story.

  3. steffer profile image61
    stefferposted 13 years ago

    for me this is a very easy answer, defenetly modern warfare.

    Although i have to say that the storyline of the world at war game, was pretty neat, the multi player game of modern warfare was much more fun. i have played both the games, but there was something with world at war, that just couldn't keep me playing.

    Specially in the online multi player mode, the perks and extra's are much more fun in modern warfare, also the weapons in mw1 are much better and give a better handling. After being used of playing modern warfare, going to world at war was a bit of a shock, i don't like the weapons, and the extra's like the dogs, just don't do it to me. It's much more fun, getting an helicopter.

    Also, i like to play as a sniper, so, when i need to choose, i prefer the instead of one from the 1940's.

    I have marked the 10th of november on my calendar.For the modern warfare2 game, i can't wait.


  4. profile image55
    xravexheavenxposted 13 years ago

    I like World at War a lot better because of the older weapons.

  5. critnour profile image60
    critnourposted 13 years ago

    I would have to go with Modern Warfare because it was modern.  There are just too many world war 2 games out there, it's getting repetative.

    1. steffer profile image61
      stefferposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      That's completely true
      i mean, aren't people getting tired of them?
      i too like to kill some germans and so, but the thing that is starting to set me back is that in almost any of the wwo2 games, all levels or maps are the same like.

      It is great that huge parts of that war are used, this also learns people some extra history in a fun way. But there almost always the same in much games.

      Like for instance, the landing of normandie, the fallaise gap,...
      operation market garden in Holland, and so forth.

      Now i live in Belgium, and we sure have had our part of the fight, but in how many games, you find something about the battles here, except for the Ardennes offensive. (see band of brothers episode5)

      There where even worse fights in Brussels, Antwerp....but nothing about that in those games, and that's what sucks to me.

      Therefore i like modern warfare more, it is something new, finally we're able to play with modern weapons, and everybody can relate to the time and place of the game, cause we see those things every single day in the news. This ads a great feeling of reality.

  6. Wonder_Woman profile image58
    Wonder_Womanposted 13 years ago

    World at war hands down, come on nazi zombies?

  7. mynameisnotpaul profile image60
    mynameisnotpaulposted 13 years ago

    There is no comparison. MW owns WaW.

  8. thisisoli profile image72
    thisisoliposted 13 years ago

    I prefer MW, however I still love to play the old COD's!

    I am still boycotting the latest MW2, no dedicated server support, only one profile, sh** loads of problems connecting to multiplayer games.  Screw that I liked it when you could choose how you wanted to play, sure leave the mix and match oprion in, but BRING BACK DEDICATED SERVERS!

  9. xboxps3wow profile image39
    xboxps3wowposted 13 years ago

    I like Modern Warfare 2 a lot better! I never played the zombies, so with all these new updates and upgrades for weapons, I enjoy the MW2 better.

  10. Nixon545 profile image60
    Nixon545posted 13 years ago

    yea i definatly think mw2 is better. But there are still many things bad about it that i stated in one of my hubs(not advertising it) ha. But i didnt play much cod5 and i went back to cod4 until mw2 came out.

  11. ryansjones profile image59
    ryansjonesposted 13 years ago

    I liked Modern Warfare 2 more than World At war.  I liked the death matches on it, as well as the co op missions you can do with other players.

  12. profile image0
    Jared in Vegasposted 13 years ago

    I liked the campaign mode of World At War better because I felt more involved in the game.  I mean, it lets you play through a very significant time in history. The campaign mode of Modern Warfare seems a little more like fantasy, but I agree, if you play multiplayer then Modern Warfare is better.  To be honest though, I usually turn to Halo 3 for my multiplayer.

  13. ForKicks profile image58
    ForKicksposted 13 years ago

    I haven't played World At War, but I've seen countless missions on youtube on it, so don't count me out of this subject.

    In my opinion, Modern Warfare 2 outshines World At War.
    First of all, I want to know is, who in the hell gave activision the permission to put zombies in a war game? I didn't know Capcom's Resident Evil 5 had an affair with Activision. I wasn't feeling the zombie idea whatsoever.

  14. cabinetkings profile image61
    cabinetkingsposted 12 years ago

    Modern Warfare 2 is exponentially better than World at War.

  15. profile image51
    Brumnickposted 12 years ago

    I prefer Modern warfare 2, 1 then WaW in that order!

  16. passthejelly profile image75
    passthejellyposted 12 years ago

    I think that a lot more effort went in to making Modern Warfare and it's a lot less buggy.  I'd do with MW


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)