Is it safer to have surgery with or without a blood transfussion??
I want to know people's opinions before I write about this.
Most surgeries do not require a blood transfusion. In fact most surgeries do not require the use of additional blood of any kind unless there is unexpected severe blood loss or the patient is being treated for a blood related ailment. If a patient is in need of blood, I feel it is safer to have a transfusion then it is to put added stress on a patient who has insufficient blood flow. Surgery alone is very stressful to the body and especially the heart. A surgery could become extremely dangerous if the patient has lost too much blood. Blood supplies in the United States are very "safe", despite the horror stories that sometimes surface. I personally would risk a blood transfusion over a potential heart attack or stroke.
That would depend on whether or not you need a blood transfusion. If you are 'bleeding out' during surgery and are about to die, then it's probably better/safer to have the transfusion than to die, even if there is some risk of a transfusion reaction or infectious disease. Most people would choose that over death.
If you don't need a blood transfusion, as with a great majority of surgeries, then there would be no need and you would be risking side effects and complications for no reason, no benefit.
Is there more to the question? I'm not sure a good answer could be written that covers all surgeries and all situations?? I guess I'm a little confused.
It depends on the surgery you are undergoing and the patients condition like hemoglobin level. If you are undergoing a major surgery with lot of blood bleeding its safer to have a blood transfusion otherwise your important organs will get compromised blood supply. Similarly if the patient is very ill weak parson with very low hemoglobin levels blood transfusion to elevate the hemoglobin levels is safe when undergoing surgery.
Usually blood transfusions are not needed for healthy individuals for most surgeries.
It's not a matter of which is safer; it's a matter of weighing the options in each individual situation. Generally, blood transfusion is indicated when the hemoglobin level drops below a certain point. It is always prudent to have a type and cross match for blood prior to surgery in case there is a blood loss sufficient to warrant transfusion.
by davidkaluge 5 years ago
I know that some Christians (Jehovah's Witness) do not allow blood transfusion and they claim it is based on religious reason. Does it mean that others are sinners for disobeying God's instruction?
by ngureco 9 years ago
Can A Recipient of Blood Transfusion Inherit Donor’s Traits and Talents?
by ngureco 9 years ago
Is It Ungodly To Receive Blood Transfusion From Outside Family Members?
by scruffyfy 6 years ago
Is it appropriate to give medicines (Ranitidine) to be exact IVTT while BT is going on?I have a question to ask regarding giving medication while blood transfusion is on going. I had a case one time in which the patient has an ongoing Blood transfusion and her ranitidine needs to be given at that...
by Ian Batanda 15 months ago
Would the world be safer without religion?Religious extremism seems to be a serious driving force for many atrocities happening around the world. Would the world be safer if there were no religious differences?
by Zipper 3 years ago
How many of you have either had surgery this year or will have surgery by the end of the year?I am writing a poem about people who suffer behind closed doors. People who have had or will have surgeries that were successful and those that have failed. It will be a poem of...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|