ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Originality in Your Fantasy Novel: Pros and Cons

Updated on September 4, 2014
M. T. Dremer profile image

M. T. Dremer is the author of four novels and received a Bachelor's Degree in Creative Writing from Grand Valley State University.

Should you be concerned if there's an elf in your fantasy novel?
Should you be concerned if there's an elf in your fantasy novel?

This is a subject I’ve touched on in several other hubs, most notably ‘How to Write for Yourself’, which stresses how ‘what you want to write’ is more important than ‘what you think you should be writing’. But there is a legitimate question, when writing fiction of any kind, how much of your energy to focus on making things seem new and original, versus using clichés, tropes and staples (which are faster and more familiar). I find this subject to be particularly important for fantasy authors because we create our worlds from scratch. There are numerous influences throughout, but the question of originality, versus steadfast standbys, is constantly on our minds.

It should be noted that I’m not really referring to the narrative or plot of a story. While everyone hopes that their story is one of a kind, that old adage holds true that ‘all great writers steal’. With the sheer volume of stories available, it’s unlikely you’ll strike on that one elusive concept that no one has thought of before. But this isn’t a cause for distress. What makes your story original is your telling of it, and how it impacts your characters and setting. I can point back to every influence for each of my novels. And yet, if I didn’t lay it out, no one would ever know one was inspired by the other. Think of it as a neat fail-safe of editing. So, when conceptualizing, don’t worry if your story is too close to your favorite book or movie. That’s actually a great place to start because it hones in on something you like and ensures you will like your novel as well. Passion for the work is an invisible force that the reader can feel radiating off the page.

Dragonflight (Dragonriders of Pern - Volume 1)
Dragonflight (Dragonriders of Pern - Volume 1)

Just because we've seen dragons before, doesn't mean you can't do something great with them.



There was a line I used in my beginner’s guide to genre fiction, where I talked about not creating unnecessary words to describe existing things. The example line was “they were eating doba in the snarg” as an ‘original’ way of saying “they were eating bread in the forest”. The flaw illustrated in this example was that needlessly renaming things proved confusing for the reader. This doesn’t need to be as strict with naming original creatures, but it should still be given careful thought. Because, your reader will understand “The vampires had entered the dwarven fortress,” more than they will “the dornacks had entered the skeevian fortress.” This is where you must decide what is most important to you. An original creation, or a quicker writing/reading experience. Because, if you introduce a new creature, that creature must be explained to the reader eventually.

Even fantasy novels based entirely in worlds with no ties to our own, often explain fantastical creatures with comparisons to real-world animals. I.e. ‘it was the size of a lion’ or ‘had teeth like a shark’. Fantasy monsters, like vampires and dragons, have the benefit of being used so often that most of the general population already knows the gist of them. Your dragons might be entirely different from Anne McCaffrey’s dragons, but you can refer to a dragon in your story without having your main character say “A dragon? What’s that?”

Original Creatures
Pro: Something the audience has never seen before.
Con: Takes more work to describe.

Clichéd Creatures
Pro: Easy to write for and quickly understand.
Con: Everyone has seen it before.


The great dwarf city in the mountains, the elf village in the forest, the orcs and ogres under the ground; what do these all have in common? Well, if you enjoy reading fantasy, then there is a good chance you’ve seen all of them before. Just like you’ve probably seen a parched desert, serpent-filled ocean and a farm village that is peacefully separated from what is really going on in the world. I addressed this in my article about making a fantasy map, but part of it bears repeating: your world is going to look familiar by design. We can only reinvent geology and physics so much before even we can’t understand how it works.

Having said that, where your character goes and how he interacts with that environment, is going to determine how ‘original’ it is. And, much like with the creatures, the more original stuff will likely take more time to explain. For example, you might take them to a desert that is very hot, but water is plentiful. Or maybe your elves live in the mountains, instead of dwarves. Whatever the case, you’ll need to be prepared that your audience might be a bit confused by this switch up. Why didn’t the water in the desert dry up? Why are those elves in the mountains instead of the forest? What’s interesting about clichéd concepts and characters is that they also have an opposing reaction when you try to do them differently. A good example is Twilight, wherein Stephanie Meyer took away virtually all characteristics of a vampire (particularly their fangs and the lethality of the sun), at which point there were many readers who loudly proclaimed those weren’t vampires. Technically speaking, the author could have done whatever she wants because vampires don’t actually exist. But, these frequently used things have created an unspoken standard about what they should and shouldn’t be. So, you don’t necessarily have to explain why your elves live in the mountains, but you can be certain your reader is going to question it, which could have just as negative an impact as a positive one.

Original Locations
Pro: Opportunity to put a twist on a boring environment.
Con: Stretch too far and readers might question the explanation.

Clichéd Locations
Pro: Most places already make sense from a geological perspective.
Con: Pigeon-holes what you can do with that setting.

Your characters should define their abilities, not the other way around.
Your characters should define their abilities, not the other way around.


“The grizzled ranger rubbed a gloved hand over his stubble as he surveyed the inn from a dark corner.” Anyone who has played Dungeons and Dragons (or any of its equivalents) will know that classes are a big part of building a character. Considering how closely related the fantasy genre is to those games, it’s understandable that we would see their equivalents running around in the books we love. As with before, using it as inspiration is fine, but I do think it shouldn’t be their first or most defining characteristic. Otherwise your ranger ends up being just that; a ranger. You want all of your characters to have depth, not because someone else is demanding it, but because you can’t take them the distance without it. Particularly because fantasy books tend to be on the longer side and you want a character who leaves an impression every time we see them. A good rule of thumb is that if there is any point where you forget a character is there, then they either need to be edited out, or have their role bulked up.

Having said that, these character tropes can be used for side characters that we won’t see again. It takes considerable effort to build a good backstory for your main characters, but doing it for every wayward traveler they might encounter would quickly get exhausting, which is where these clichéd rangers might come in handy. If you ever find that this side character is more interesting than your main character, then you might have to again consider whether you’re writing for yourself or for someone else.

Original Characters
Pro: Has enough depth to fill a series of books.
Con: Might not be as quickly relatable to readers.

Clichéd Characters
Pro: Good for quick side characters and as inspiration for main characters.
Con: Might read too much like a D&D campaign.

Eternity's Reach (The Sword of Eternity) (Volume 1)
Eternity's Reach (The Sword of Eternity) (Volume 1)

My fantasy novel was inspired by the Legend of Zelda. But time and editing have made it into its own unique story.



Here’s a breakdown of where we ended up:

Original Fantasy Novel
Pro: Offers fans something new and different.
Con: A lot of work and possibly harder for the reader to understand.

Clichéd Fantasy Novel
Pro: Quicker to write and easier for your reader to understand.
Con: Same old stuff could quickly get boring.

I would like to say that I haven’t been intending to use ‘cliché’ as a derogatory term in this article. The point I want you to take away from this is that both sides are legitimate forms of writing and both have their respective advantages/disadvantages. I’ve written both and I’ve found that clichéd concepts are slightly more fun to use, because it helps move a story along like a greased slip-and-slide. Whereas I felt that the original concepts resulted in a more polished final product, because I was already paying such close attention to everything.

More likely than not, you’ll probably use some combination of the two for your novel. And that’s totally fine. But I wanted to outline these pros and cons because people who want to use clichéd concepts shouldn’t feel like they are writing ‘trashy’ fiction and people who want to use original concepts shouldn’t feel like they have to avoid every cliché in order to be considered ‘literary’. Ultimately, what is most fun for you to write is what will be most fun for your audience to read.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Ameraka profile image


      10 months ago from Wisconsin

      Well, what's most fun to me is original. Because I like creating things. I like worldbuilding, not taking things that others have made. I'm tired of the same fantasy worlds and creatures, and that's not the kind of fantasy I want to write. That said, I do use some fantasy tropes (less negative connotation than cliche) --such as magic. It would hardly be fantasy without magic. But I don't have magical creatures. And the only race is human. But there are many human races. And some races have magic, while some don't. That is, some races have some people who have magic, and others have no people that have magic. And I have technology on my world. Early tech-- 19th century equivalent. Magic and tech do different things. Most magic is tied to the specific person, and they can generally only do one type of magic. There are 4 main types of magic. I generally don't have magical objects-- some objects that are "magical" are actually tech from thousands of years ago, which was more advanced pre-disaster (a la Atlantis). I do have magical places though. Specifically magical forest where magic was concentrated and normal magic rules don't apply. The people that live there have a brand of magic all their own.

      I don't have dragons but I have large reptiles-- it's sort of like an AU earth where there is magic and the dinosaurs didn't become extinct. The conquering race rides a kind of reptile, and flies in skyships. They have better tech because they didn't rely on magic. A long time ago, they did rely on magic when they had mage-slaves....

    • ACSutliff profile image


      2 years ago

      Your comment reminds me that writers can break rules without knowing they exist. That is something I worry about. How can I avoid using a cliche if I don't even know it's a cliche? What if I create my own original idea and only later discover that someone else had a very similar idea well before I did? The best answer I can come up with is to read. A lot. The more I know, the more I realize I do not know.

    • M. T. Dremer profile imageAUTHOR

      M. T. Dremer 

      2 years ago from United States

      ACSutliff - Twilight definitely bent the rules of what a vampire could/should be. To the point that, had I been reading a draft of it, I might have suggested she call them something different, or give them more traits of vampires. But I think it has to do more with intent. A lot of authors want to do their own take on a vampire, which is an intentional twist on a familiar myth. Where as others might want to have vampires in their novel, but they don't want to be cliche, so they call them something else.

      A good way to gauge which side of the spectrum is worth the effort might be to approach it from the reader's perspective. If you read a book that described a picture perfect vampire, and the author named it a Snorg, would that be disappointing? Would it feel like the author is reaching? Would it feel like they're trying to cheat? As with other tools of writing, you need to know the rules before you can break them. And I view cliches as just more tools in the toolbox, to use when the situation calls for it.

      Thanks for the comment!

    • ACSutliff profile image


      2 years ago

      Hi M.T.,

      You have brought up a good point with this hub, and I appreciate your take on cliches as a sort of balancing act. I agree wholeheartedly that your passion needs to come first. If you are writing passionately about your world and your characters, people will feel that and in so doing, you will likely describe your world and your characters more deeply than the cliche, so it will withstand the scrutiny of critics while still engaging and entertaining your readers.

      Do you think writers should make up new names for original concepts to avoid making fans angry when they don't get the cliche they expect? (The Twilight situation with the vampires was a great example of this.)


    • M. T. Dremer profile imageAUTHOR

      M. T. Dremer 

      3 years ago from United States

      Grodd - Listening to nature sounds is a good idea. It makes you stop and think about each little noise and detail. Then, the more you get used to it, the more you're able to place yourself in unreal environments. For example, in a fantasy environment, you don't need to have been there to imagine the clop of horses or the clash of steel. Thanks for the comment!

    • M. T. Dremer profile imageAUTHOR

      M. T. Dremer 

      4 years ago from United States

      Jodah - Thank you for the comment! Glad I could help you on your writing journey. :)

    • Jodah profile image

      John Hansen 

      4 years ago from Queensland Australia

      Very informative and interesting hub mtdremer. I have never written a fantasy novel, but have written a short children's fantasy story, and will probably write more so I found this helpful. Voted up.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)