What is your opinion, Is it better to self publish or find a publisher and get a contract...
Now days with modern technology as it is it has become easy for an author to self publish. However is it really worth the time that it takes to also self market? I have found that the old traditional way of finding a publisher and going through the traditional steps of submitting a query letter and locking a deal with them is more beneficial as well as financially rewarding than self publishing. What are your thoughts on this subject?
Self-Publishing means more profit for the artist. However, you have to be ready to do the leg work. Personally, I believe that the process of marketing and promotion is better left to professionals.
It will be always better if you can get a traditional publisher and contract. But at the same time it is very difficult also. Instead of wasting time in finding a publisher for a very long time, it is better to go for self-publishing.
Everyone who has ever offered me advice has said "Don't self-publish". The most obvious reason is that it is much more work on your part; I'd rather have an agent and publishing company working with me than trying to figure it all out on my own. The other reason is that a lot of self-published stories I've seen are very poorly written and edited. Because of that, I would almost never consider purchasing a self-published book. Editors and publishing companies naturally filter out a lot of the poorly edited material and I'm more likely to buy from them because there is a higher chance I will enjoy the book, or at least not find spelling errors. If anyone else feels like me, self-published books have a disadvantage right out of the gate.
In my humble, unlearned opinion, Sundaymoments, your first inclination is correct. It seems to me that there's nothing like a legitimate professional publishing house (staffed with professionals who screen manuscripts for a living) accepting something you have written for publication. There's nothing like having that kind of backing, which really signals that perhaps YOU have actually written something of high-grade, professional quality. You don't have to guess; you know it is good!
Self publishing.... is.... well..... self publishing. You know what I mean? There's a publicly acknowledged desperate quality to it. Its like going to the senior high school prom with your cousin.
However, in the interest of fairness it is important to acknowledge that some smashing successes started out by self publishing one or two of their first books. I believe John Grisham (the legal novel writer) sold his firts novel, "A Time to Kill" out of the trunk of his car. Look at him now!!
But stil, if you have prospects of getting a contract with an honest to goodness publishing house, and you can let them handle all the administrative stuff for you.....
Good Luck, if you're talking about yourself.
Self publish in order to experience the whole process of publishing. You will appreciate writing more, be compassionate to the people who are doing the work when you find a publisher and the self publishing is a lot faster, dependent only on your budget.
Of course a traditional publisher adds instant credibility to your work, a stamp of approval at least from one publishing house.
My very best wishes to you whichever route you choose.
I feel that self-publish is the way to go. There is a variety of reasons I am making this statement.
1. You have total control over your material.
2. Whether you self-publish or go traditional there is going to be a lot of work for you as the author. It is the author that makes the success of his/her book. Most traditional publishers have a budget and unless you are well known they will not usually expend the resources to make your book a success.
3. There are many great books by unknown writers who never get the chance through a traditional publisher and
self-publishing offers that chance. The options available today are enormous for new authors.
4. Self-publishing allows you as an author to know the whole publishing process and as such you are better for the experience.
5. The profits for a self-published author are more than going with a traditional publisher. You have more control over the price you feel your book is worth taking into consideration any books on similiar topics.
6. The self-published route basically uses the same technology as traditional publishers with the printing technology today which save the costs of maintaing an inventory which can be costly.
7. Self-published books never go out of print as with traditional publishers. Your books are always available for purchase.
by Matthew Dawson 6 years ago
In your opinion is better to self-publish or publish the old traditional way and why?In the last few years I have heard a lot of hype about self publishing and yes I do self publish. However I have also heard a lot of hype about the old traditional way of obtaining a contract by publishing house;...
by Paul Swendson 7 years ago
I just finished compiling a book related to American History. Now I am starting to look into publishing items, and from what I can tell, self-publishing in electronic form may be the best bet. Does anyone have any suggestions?
by M. T. Dremer 4 years ago
Has your experience with self publishing been positive or negative?For those of you who have self published a book (either physical or ebook), how would you say your experience was overall? Please consider things like production costs, self promotion, sales and reviews. What is the best thing about...
by Ande Moore 6 years ago
What are your preferred methods of selling your novel; self publishing or through the house?
by akeejaho 10 years ago
Well, this has got to be a first. I signed into HubPages because I needed to prove to myself that I could attract readers. I needed to prove this to myself. I have a few that read my things, and it does humble me to know that. Thank you to those of you that have. But...
by Matthew Dawson 4 years ago
Self-publishing or traditional publishing which one is the better?Is getting a contract by a publishing house still the best way to publish or is Self-Publishing the way to publish your book. I have heard that self-publishing is the way to successfully publish now days but it just seems like it is...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|