Do you think the Glass-Steagall Act should be brought back to prevent risky bank

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (11 posts)
  1. Deborah-Diane profile image83
    Deborah-Dianeposted 6 years ago

    Do you think the Glass-Steagall Act should be brought back to prevent risky bank investments?

    Glass-Steagall was inacted in 1933 to separate commercial banking and investment banking.  Most of it was repealed in 1999, and there have been serious bank problems since then.

  2. john000 profile image97
    john000posted 6 years ago

    I do believe Glass-Steagall should be brought back. It took a serious depression for the powers that be to realize that banks using citizen deposits to speculate don't work for the majority of people. If somebody wants to work the market, just get a stockbroker. A bank is different - it is a place where conservative ideas like savings deposits earning a modest return are placed into conservative investments like small businesses and mortgages. Under Glass-Steagall you could depend on that. Today, we have banks avoiding small business loans, carrying a huge portfolio of nonperforming loans, or sitting on the Federal Government's doorstep waiting to be bailed-out. And, of course, JPMorgan (a bank in the grey zone approved to enter into the markets with everybody's money) just took another flier on derivative investments and got beaten on nothing more than a "trade." We do not need traders in banks. "Investment Banks" don't need to speculate to raise capital.
    What has gone on for the last 4 years (and before) won't stop until something like Glass Steagall (wouldn't it be nice if they just brought back Glass Steagall? - think of the savings) is brought back.

  3. profile image67
    maria v eylesposted 6 years ago

    Absolutely. Our economic collapse is inevitable without it. The Glass-Steagall act must apply to mortgage lenders of all types as well. Thank you for bringing it up.

    1. Deborah-Diane profile image83
      Deborah-Dianeposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      I never thought about applying the Glass-Steagall Banking laws to mortgage companies, but it is a great suggestion.

  4. LandmarkWealth profile image78
    LandmarkWealthposted 6 years ago

    It sounds like a nice idea, but in reality a big part of the reason the act was repealed was it wasn't being observed anyway prior to it's repeal.  Banks had created seperate holding companies to segregate the commercial from the investment banking.  But if one was effected it would effect the holding company and subsequently the other arm of the holding company. 

    In reality it was the banks that had a more diversified business platform in both retail and investment banking that didn't need a bailout.  The financial institutions that were in the most trouble such as Lehman and Bear Sterns had no commercial arm and were unable to weather the storm.  That is why the first thing the Federal Reserve did at the beginning of the crisis was open the discount lending window to the investment banks back in 2008. 

    The heart of the problem is not the seperation of these institutions but rather the excess artficial demand in the CMO market created by the GSE's ( Fannie & Freddie).  They created demand that the marketplace on it's own could have never produced.  It is simply well intended but misguided social engineering of the financial system.  The best way to balance greed is with risk.  If Goverment agencies begin to subsidize risk, then all that is left is greed.

    1. Deborah-Diane profile image83
      Deborah-Dianeposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you, LandmarkWealth, for your well thought out comments.  It is a very controversial issue, I know. Personally, I think the banking system was operating a bit more smoothly before Glass-Steagall was gutted.  However, I know some disagree.

    2. john000 profile image97
      john000posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, WM - these institutions took on risky mortgages due to the fact that Clinton era wording of policy at GSE's (or libberal interpretation) led to what is no more than mortgage speculation.New Steagall to define limit.

    3. LandmarkWealth profile image78
      LandmarkWealthposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Banks don't like to loan money to people who can't pay them back.  But if the GSE's will buy the loan off of your books, then why not.  Gov't intervention for the purpose of social engineering creates market disloacations.

    4. john000 profile image97
      john000posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      A good review of what Glass-Steagall was and was not, see http://www.wnyc.org/articles/its-free-c … be-enough/ Article will help them who question Glass-Steagall tothink again.Would have helpd

  5. cat on a soapbox profile image95
    cat on a soapboxposted 6 years ago

    Ideally, yes!  I think the reason PresidentClinton was persuaded to sign its repeal was the fact that it had lost its effectiveness. Deregulation has since been a disaster!

    1. Deborah-Diane profile image83
      Deborah-Dianeposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, I agree that deregulation of the banks and brokerage firms has been a disaster ... and it continues to grow.  There are a few legislators who talk about reviving Glass Steagall, and I hope comments like yours encourage them to proceed.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)