ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Broken Trust, Not Condoms

Updated on July 18, 2015

Freedom of the Press?

Broke No Laws

Legal experts have said that WikiLeaks has “likely broken no laws” and this is in contrast with the branding that top US politicians called the website. Politicians are calling WikiLeaks a terrorist group and some had even gone further to even cause to endanger the life of its staff.

WikiLeaks is providing information to the public based on documents provided by various whistleblowers. These documents came from legitimate sources and are authenticated documents even by those in the US military and US political sphere. However, with the potential sensitivity of data various governments had called the move by WikiLieaks and Julian Assange as careless and may cause potential casualties.

US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates admitted in a letter to the US congress that no sensitive intelligence sources or methods had been compromised by the Afghan war logs disclosure. The Pentagon stated there was no evidence the WikiLeaks reports had led to anyone being harmed in Afghanistan. NATO in Kabul told CNN it couldn't find a single person who needed protecting.

Lawmakers and Legal Experts Call For Restraint in Wikileaks Hearing

The House Judiciary Committee held a surprisingly subdued hearing this morning on the legal and constitutional issues surrounding Wikileaks' publication activities. Committee members repeatedly emphasized the importance of protecting First Amendment rights and cautioned against overreaction to Wikileaks. The seven legal experts called to testify agreed, almost all of them noting that:

Excessive government secrecy is a serious problem that needs to be fixed,

It's critically important to protect freedom of expression and the press, and

The government should be extremely cautious about pursuing any prosecutions under the Espionage Act or any legislation that would expand that law, which is already poorly written and could easily be applied in ways that would be unconstitutional.

Is Julian Assange arrest really about sexual misconduct?

Since the first mentions of a leak of potentially embarrassing U.S. diplomatic cables, a quiet war has blossomed between those who claim they support openness and free speech and those who claim they are protecting lives, international cooperation, and the rights of the Swedish court system.

The war has opened on two fronts: The first front is an attempt to stop the public from getting access to WikiLeaks' trove of diplomatic cables and war documents. The second front is an attempt to get WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange either behind bars or, if Assange's claims are to be believed, assassinated.

-In August, 2010, shortly after Wikileaks announced it would be releasing thousands of documents about the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, Swedish prosecutors open an investigation into charges of rape and sexual molestation of two women in Sweden against Assange. Charges against him are promptly dropped.

Rape Charges Dropped

One week after the initial charges are dropped, Swedish prosecutors reopen the case against Assange and seek an International Arrest warrant for the Australian national because, prosecutors said, he refused to come in for questioning. Assange and his lawyers claims the case is politically motivated and fights the order; his lawyers call it part of a larger "smear campaign."

The two women who filed the original claim, are said to have had sex with Assange on two successive nights. There's not much in the reports about forced sex or molestation, or rape. In fact, besides stating Assange had “an aversion to the word no” there is no description of anything resembling rape. The rape charges were dropped in August 2010.

Julian Assange no longer faces sex abuse charges in Sweden after a prosecutor decided to investigate only one of two complaints against him, and not as a sexual offense. Mr Assange is still suspected of molesting a woman on August 13, but molestation is not a sex crime under Swedish law, according to a spokeswoman for the Swedish Prosecution Authority. It can cover a wide range of offenses, including reckless conduct or inappropriate physical contact with another adult, and can result in fines or up to one year in prison.

Daniel Ellsberg, the man who famously leaked the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War defended both WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and the Army private suspected of providing the site with thousands of sensitive government documents.

Daniel Ellsberg said Thursday that Wikileaks' disclosure of government secrets on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and thousands of diplomatic cables was "exactly the right thing" to do.

Daniel Ellsberg said the government is wrong to pursue criminal charges against Assange, comparing him to New York Times and Washington Post journalists who have published information from classified documents.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      7 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      Anything he saw was low-level stuff. I am not approving what he did...

      However, there is too much smoke, and not enough substance...

      There is a hidden agenda...

    • wilderness profile image

      Dan Harmon 

      7 years ago from Boise, Idaho

      Thank you for the update on Wikileaks. The last I had heard anything military secrets such as troop movements had been posted for the world (and our enemies) to see.

      It this type of thing is not true, then I cannot see any reason to persecute him either socially or legally. I've always suspected that the sex scandal was just that - a scandal with little substance.

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      If we knew what "runs beneath the still waters...." it would freighten us...

      Thanks for your co0mments.

    • RunAbstract profile image


      8 years ago from USA

      Great article.

      I don't know if you've seen this yet... but I wanted to send it along.

      It is a real eye opener.

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      Thanks for your comments!

    • ACSutliff profile image


      8 years ago

      Great hub, catchy title! Thanks for keeping me informed!

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      I agree. The title is designed to be a "play on words."

      His alledged "misconduct" is a separate topic. I believe the charges would have gone away, if not for the publicity of the leaks. They did drop the charges, only to reinstate them.

      My background involves being a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - Far East. I would die before I divulged sensitive information...

    • oceansnsunsets profile image


      8 years ago from The Midwest, USA

      I don't think he is about sexual misconduct, and always thought that whole part of the bigger issue was odd. Potentially hurting whole groups of people in a country shouldn't be encouraged and allowed. I found it sad that to express that, that some make it sound like that you are "for corruption" in government, which I am not. All very odd, and very indicative of what we are dealing with today in the world. Thank you for sharing!

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      We have choices: to be a bug, or the windshield, the hammer or the nail. If we choose to be passive, there will be no accountability...

      Thanks for stopping by...

    • World-Traveler profile image


      8 years ago from USA

      Those are the very same problems that keep good people from coming forward to report incidents of corruption. It is precisely how the powers that be remain in power. The simple message is, report and we will make your life holy miserable. Miserable for ever. Voted Up!

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      Oops on the poll "bug." Will check it.

      We are mostly a "kind and gentle nation..." Example we do not stone offenders...

    • FitnezzJim profile image


      8 years ago from Fredericksburg, Virginia

      Interesting little bug in your vote widget. You can say 'no', and it reports you said 'yes'. The only thing worse than a bad poll, is a pollster that only hears what he wants to hear.

      As for Assange, I have no doubt that making folks in the U.S. mad is near the bottom of his worry list. We play fairly mild and sedate compared to others he's offended.

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA

      Darlene Sabella,

      "If you work into a sector of our government and if the reasons are for national security, it is very important to honor that role." Absolutely agree. However, if "illegal cover-ups" are classified to prevent embarrassment, or ineptness, transparency is a good thing.

      Thanks for you comments.

    • Darlene Sabella profile image

      Darlene Sabella 

      8 years ago from Hello, my name is Toast and Jam, I live in the forest with my dog named Sam ...

      Now I worked for organizations that required me to have a top secret clearence, now I have had two. If you work into a sector of our government and if the reasons are for national security, it is very important to honor that role. With that said, I have not followed this issue as I am so busy trying to figure out what is going on with Nancy Grace. Free speech is an issue, but what exactly has been leaked and to whom, and who benefits from this kind of progranda? Love & peace Darski rate up

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      Thanks... "Brilliant" perhaps meaning more light needs to be shone in this arena...

    • arthurchappell profile image


      8 years ago from Manchester, England

      brilliant up to date summary of this major issue - thank you.

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      My "wise owl!" As I understand the unfolding events... He was given the information. If this is true, he is no different than the newspapers....

    • dallas93444 profile imageAUTHOR

      Dallas W Thompson 

      8 years ago from Bakersfield, CA


      As one who main occupation was Top Secret stuff in Joint Chiefs of Staff - Far East, I can tell you if the information was classified, no one had access, other than those with a need to know.

      Given this, our government has gotten sloppy, or the information was not really "classified" in terms of National Security, but classified in terms of not letting others know about our "gossip."

      I am all for "transparency." However, the sources of information must be protected... Apparently Wikileaks is now doing a better job of redacting (blacking out sensitive information - names)...

      The Pentagon Paper release in retrospect was a good thing... Not sure if Wikileaks is good, or bad... I like the idea accountability, however, there may be some really embarrassing information coming out.. I have seen pictures that I have chosen not to include... It ain't pretty... but, does this embarrassment justify talks of killing (eradicating, or eliminating) the source of the information?

    • msorensson profile image


      8 years ago

      My son was asking me about this today, so in that context I had to think about it.

      In the first place, Assange had the right to do as he pleased.

      In the second place how he obtained the information is subject to interpretation.

      In the third place, even if all the knowledge that he was purported to have stolen and released were released to the public, what good or bad will it do?

      We are already swimming in a sea of data than we care to analyze.

      My one cent.

    • katiem2 profile image


      8 years ago from I'm outta here

      It seems to me the biggest issue here is what he exposed, not why or how, WHAT!

      I gotta say why the secrets, and shouldn't government be held accountable. I can imagine the desire to let the public know about these issues and topics. We are a democracy and enjoy freedom of speech. I'm amazed at the details put in such fragile areas, we all know smart computer hackers can access most anything so why store it in this method. It's just wacky...

      If I were to have such a vital job in government, I'd do my job as a servant and earn every dollar and never imagine my work would be kept secret and if I were to do something stupid I'd feel most confident I'd be exposed for it. I just don't get it, where's the accountability? Hmmmm weird science. Well done and thought provoking. peace :)


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)