ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case and verdict: innocent?

Updated on July 16, 2013
Source

The Trayvon Martin case

On the night of February 26, 2012, Trayvon Martin, unarmed, was shot by George Zimmerman, an armed watchman for the community that he was visiting. George Zimmerman defended his actions under the Stand your ground law of 2005, claiming his life was in danger when he shot Trayvon martin. Was George Zimmerman within his legal limits when he applied deadly force against an unarmed teenager?

The law exists to provide a guide to what is the best measure of protection, with respect to the liberties entitled to all individuals, regardless of opinions. The idea of equality, freedom, and justice are the aspects that the law expects to achieve, without compromising the standards for the rights of any individual who abides by what the law entails.

The law is intended to give each person the right to protect themselves. The enforcement of the law is expected to be fair and unbiased of opinions, allowing for the best decisions to be made to achieve justice. Laws are expected to preserve justice for the right to life, liberty and the definition of what constitutes the violation of the law not what constitutes the law based on public opinion or personal interests.

Timeline of events on February 26, 2012

In order to understand why this case is so important, here is a list of what is known about the events that occurred on February 26, 2012 when Trayvon Martin was shot and killed at the Retreat at Twin Lakes:

  • 7:00 PM- George Zimmerman makes a 9-1-1 call to police about a suspicious person who looks like they are "up to no good." After describing the individual as one that is "up to no good" and tries to follow him, the dispatcher tells him to stop. George Zimmerman continues to follow Trayvon Martin even after he was instructed to stop. He loses sight of Trayvon Martin
  • 7:10 PM- Trayvon Martin was talking on his cell phone to his girlfriend while walking to his family’s home from the convenience store when George Zimmerman approached. Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman exchange words and there was an altercation. The phone call ends.
  • 7:11 PM- A witness reports gunshots and screams in the neighborhood. A witness sees a flashlight and begs police to hurry.
  • 7:17 PM- Police arrive to the Retreat at Twin Lakes. Witness calls police to report screaming and gunshots in her neighborhood. Witness reported seeing a flashlight still present and possibly one person shot.
  • 7:25 PM- Trayvon Martin is dead. George Zimmerman has a bloody nose and a wound on the back of his head. George Zimmerman is arrested and taken into custody for questioning. Four hours later, George Zimmerman is released and no charges are brought against him.

This case questions the rights given to each individual and the integrity of the law given for the right to exercise individual rights without persecution. There is a need to preserve the rights of individuals from the variation of the law at the hands of individual interpretation for the meaning that is stated with each law.

Is Florida's Stand your ground law of 2005 the right defense for this case?

See results

Florida's Stand your Ground Law of 2005

Under the Stand your ground law, section 776.041, the law is "not available to a person who initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself." However, in the case of George Zimmerman, the law failed to acknowledge the bearing of individual self-intent when Trayvon Martin was approached and confronted first without cause. George Zimmerman took the initiative to follow Trayvon Martin and initiated the confrontation.

Trayvon Martin was acting defensive because a suspicious man was following him. This is a teenage boy who watched a grown man following him, almost to the point of stalking him. Trayvon Martin was being stalked by an adult who initially provoked the use of any alleged force against him. Yet, George Zimmerman was released from jail that same night without any charges for his actions.

Under the section 776.041, "in good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force." When George Zimmerman alleged that he was attacked and feared for his life, the only screams that were heard on a 9-1-1 call did not come from him. There were no indications that supported the claim that he, in good faith, tried to withdraw from the physical contact.

When police arrived, George Zimmerman was found standing over Trayvon Martin and was released because the Stand Your Ground Law protected George Zimmerman, a vigilante killer, from being charged with a crime. Even though the neighborhood watch policies and rules prohibit police powers that include carrying weapons and pursuing individuals, George Zimmerman did not receive any charges for Trayvon Martin’s death.

Inconsistent views of individual principles create different expectations of the laws to benefit their own self interests and distort the original intention of the laws. The law provides an option to use the best measure of protection for a situation, without the consequences of any sanctions received for protecting yourself from harm.



Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4



Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      brian 3 years ago

      Get a race change george zimmerman!

    • profile image

      Sergio 5 years ago

      It should be fix not for me or you but for every body so no body has to go throw a tragedy like this again and with familys are mad and sad how did this happen and your child is dead and the other person goes home in his bed and sleep why y suppe

    • profile image

      Sergio 5 years ago

      Stand your ground law is crazy because people will use that so they can kill more people if florida dont change the law people are going to die and not only that familys are going to be very mad like trayvon martin family. Thats just example why it sh ould be

    • profile image

      Sergio 5 years ago

      Well they have to put the puzzle together why geroge already judge trayvon before he gets home and when the dispacthler told him not to follow him and the lies that geroge said that trayvon suppose to do to geroge they have to put every thing on the table so it can be fair and justice can be right for trayvon family and foreverbody else.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 5 years ago from Singapore

      Excellent post, I commend you for it

    • LHwritings profile image

      Lyndon Henry 5 years ago from Central Texas

      ..

      Miakouna, thanks once again for clearly laying out the facts in this case. I've voted this Up and Useful.

      In addition to the events in your timeline, I believe Zimmerman's exchange with the 911 operator demonstrated that he intended to track down Trayvon, almost surely to confront him -- I particularly note his remark "These assholes ... they always get away..." He intended to make sure Trayvon did NOT "get away". I believe it's clear he stalked and pursued Trayvon, provoking a confrontation where he shot the boy dead.

      If this is brought out in the trial, it should clinch the case that Zimmerman violated the intent of the Stand Your Ground law. However, I have no confidence in the "justice" system of this society, so it's far from a slam-dunk case.

    • profile image

      George 5 years ago

      776.041?Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:

      (1)?Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or

      (2)?Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:

      (a)?Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or

      (b)?In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

    Click to Rate This Article