ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

If You Think Antonio Martin Deserved to Die, You Really Don't Get It | Race, Police Brutality, and Lethal Force

Updated on December 25, 2014
Martin's family celebrates the holiday season with Grief.  This is wrong.
Martin's family celebrates the holiday season with Grief. This is wrong. | Source

If you think Antonio Martin deserved to die, you don't get it.

When I woke up this morning to the news that another black teenager was killed by another police officer with Antonio Martin's death only minutes from Ferguson, Missouri, I was overwhelmed with emotion. Disbelief: why does this story sound so familiar, and why do I keep waking up to news like this? Gut wrenching grief: I can't imagine how much pain Martin's family must be going through this holiday season, or the pain that Michael Brown's and Trayvon Martin's and Oscar Grant's and Eric Garner's and Tamir Rice's and too many other's families must feel during this time when family is held up as all important. Anger and confusion: why does this keep happening, and why the hell aren't we any closer to a society where cops killing minorities isn't common place?

Antonio Martin, on Tape

And then I noticed something happen which always happens when a big story blows up, even when it involves a human's death and should be greeted with nothing but sadness: controversy started swirling, and people I know and love and respect started making statements like "Antonio Martin deserved to die." If you think this the case, you really don't get it. It is wrong for anyone to be killed, it is especially wrong for a police officer to kill someone, and it is even more wrong for a cop to choose to use lethal force against a minority when there are other options on the table. Read on for my thoughts about race, police brutality, and why it is absolutely, inarguably wrong that Antonio Martin isn't alive today.

The Facts of the Case: Is Antonio Martin Innocent?

Is Antonio Martin innocent? Most likely, no. But did he deserve to die? Most certainly not. And if you point to the facts of the case as evidence to the contrary, you just don't get it.

The footage isn't very clear...

Source

Did Martin Deserve to Die?

See results

To their credit, the St. Louis police department released footage of the conflict between Martin and the officer who killed him, but the tapes that do exist are not very clear and don't perfectly corroborate the officer's story (though a body cam, which the officer wore and didn't have turned on, would have had better footage...). But even if the officer's story is 100% true, that doesn't really matter. Antonio Martin didn't deserve to die, for a few simple reasons:

  1. The police officer had options other than shooting Martin.
  2. We can, should, and do hold police officers to a higher moral standard.
  3. Lethal force should be a last resort in all situations.
  4. The police officer who killed Martin made a choice, but his rationality didn't exist in a vacuum.

Police Officers Have Options.

While the killing of Antonio Martin was a choice, it was not the officer's only option. If you think it was his best, consider some of the other options he had.

#ICan'tBreathe Proves Cops Have Options

  • Martin could have been "talked down." The officer could have tried to deescalate the situation without using force at all. This happens often when criminal's are white, but you don't hear about it because it doesn't become a national headline.
  • Even if the officer's story proves true, and Martin proved a threat to his life, the officer should have tried to remove himself from the situation before resulting to force.
  • If force did prove necessary, the officer should have first attempted to use non-lethal force, and "shot to maim" by aiming for Martin's arms or legs. It is unlikely that the officer had these intentions, as Martin was riddled with bullet holes, suggesting that the officer shot to kill.

Police are trained to have options, even if they are in danger.  Lethal force is NOT a first option.
Police are trained to have options, even if they are in danger. Lethal force is NOT a first option.

I will admit that as a civilian, I don't have a perfect perspective of this situation, and I admit as well that the first two options I listed, to deescalate the situation and try to remove yourself from danger, are probably idyllic from an officer's perspective. But even if force did prove necessary, why shoot to kill? If Martin had already been taking shots at the officer, that's a different story, but even by the officer's own account, lethal use of force should have been reserved in this situation.

We Should Hold Police Officers to a Higher Standard.

I mentioned earlier that I am a civilian, and so can't understand what the officer was going through in this situation. But to be honest, that doesn't matter too much either, because a police officer can and should be held to a higher moral standard concerning violence than a civilian like me.

When you wear a badge, more is expected of you than the rest of us.  And this is a good thing.
When you wear a badge, more is expected of you than the rest of us. And this is a good thing. | Source

See that badge to the right? When an officer of the law puts that on, they enter into a contract with us civilians. An officer's job is to serve and protect, and act as an example for the rest of us. My friends that are saying "the officer's life was in danger, what do you expect him to do!" are projecting their own mortal fears, and not realizing that police can and should be held to a higher standard. Police are trained to react rationally, not emotionally: we should hold officer's to a higher standard than the rest of us, especially when violence is concerned. If police aren't held to a higher moral standard, our society WILL NOT operate as it should.

Lethal Force Should Be a Last Resort

I know I just covered this, but it bears reporting: lethal needs to be a last resort. It needs to be. when officers utilize lethal force as anything other than a last resort, our society suffers.

Should the officer who killed Martin used lethal force as a first resort?

See results

When we can't trust our police officers to use every other option, and can't trust them to save their right to "shoot to kill" until there is nothing else they can do, we learn to fear our cops, and can demonize them when they shouldn't be blamed for justified use of force. The implications are big and important.

So why didn't the officer that shot Antonio Martin use lethal force as a last resort, instead of a first one?

The Officer Who Killed Antonio Martin Made a Racially Motivated Choice.

If you can admit that Martin shouldn't have been killed, and I think this is an easy enough admission as no one should be killed, especially by the police, than the question inevitably comes up: why was he shot to death?

Friends that I have talked with about Martin and police brutality in general have told me things like: "The officer made a choice, hindsight is 20/20, the officer just reacted." Or "he was probably scared."

But why was he scared? Why did he react like he did? Why was Martin shot? Well, in short, because Martin wasn't white. The officer who killed Antonio Martin reacted like he did BECAUSE Antonio Martin was a black man. Yes, maybe he was scared, but his fear was at-least partially racially motivated. You could say I am over simplifying things, but think about the counter example: if Martin HAD been white, he either would have been "talked down" as white criminals often are or shot in the arm or leg as white criminals often are, and this wouldn't be a national story, but rather a small blip on a police blotter in St. Louis that would have been picked up by a local paper or two. Yes, the officer who shot Antonio Martin made a choice, but his rationality didn't exist in a vacuum. It is easy to say that the officer reacted on instinct; it is more difficult to admit that that those instincts considered Martin to be more of a threat than a hypothetical white counterpart because of the color of his skin.

No One Deserves to Die.

No one. Especially when a cop is the killer, and especially when the person who is getting killed is greeted with lethal force BECAUSE they aren't white.

Police brutality is about lethal force; it is about officers of the law acting like examples of moral good and living up to the higher moral standards concerning violence that our society imposes upon them. And too often, police brutality is about race. If Antonio Martin were white, it is very likely that he would have been maimed rather than killed, and his family wouldn't be in mourning this holiday season. Ignoring any part of this difficult issue, whether it be the use of lethal force or Martin's race, ignores an important part of the police brutality discussion, and doesn't help us get any closer to improving our society. Yes, #AllLivesMatter, but the fact that you are more likely to be killed by the police in a situation like the one we all learned about this morning if you are black matters too, and we shouldn't ignore the racial undertones of Antonio Martin's death.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Nikki Caswell 

      3 years ago from New Jersey, United States

      @Timothy Hampton - So you're pretty much justifying that a person should be killed because others were killed, even if it's unjustly. This is exactly the hypocrisy that I'm talking about and trying to give such point across since you somehow think that is the answer to the things that, yes, have been going on for many years. Thank you for validating such claims and going against what you apparently try to bring to justice of the fact that lives matter. Or is it only a black person's life that truly matters, forget about the white cop?

    • Timothy Hampton profile image

      Timothy Hampton 

      3 years ago from Greater Atlanta Area

      CNiki - While you claim that people should sit back and sing old negro spirituals and pray for justice, the killings of citizens goes on unchecked. While you content that people should march and rally and sing happy songs to convince belligerents to see the light, the killings go on without recompense. They have been for hundreds of years. Read some history.

      I am a veteran of the United States Army with combat ribbons and combat stars awarded for my service to this country in the Persian Gulf. You expect me to serve in combat to protect liberty, human freedom, the democratic process (and gas prices)...then come home and sing happy songs when my own liberty, human freedom, and democratic process are being stripped away? Since I fought in the deserts for your freedom...I'll fight in the streets of America - "...against all enemies, foreign and domestic..." for mine and that of my children.

      You cannot expect citizens - of any so-called "racial" classification - to accept injustice, inequality, tyranny and oppression. Prayer and peaceful demonstrations DON'T WORK. People have been doing this since before the architect of Americas non-violent resistance was MURDERED. With all that he accomplished, people are still being killed, unjustly and without recompense, by police.

      Martin Luther King Jr. seems to be the answer for so many people who think so-called "blacks" should not be angry over injustice, inequality, tyranny, and oppression. Stop invoking this man's name to support your bias. He isn't here. You don't know what he would think in 2014. You don't know how the continued injustice and inequality would have influenced his vision. That's a huge part of why he is now DEAD.

      As for a so-called "black person" killing police who were "innocent," this leads me to believe that you think all the men shot by police are guilty or somehow deserving of what happened to them. That all police are infallible, permanently heroic, and completely sovereign. Stop lying to yourself. Besides...if your job is to kill people, you have to expect that someday...you might be killed.

      The fact is that injustice, inequality, oppression and tyranny always lead to bloodshed on both sides. If you read the history of THIS nation, you will find that riots and killings were the gneiss of the Revolutionary War...which created America.

    • profile image

      Nikki Caswell 

      3 years ago from New Jersey, United States

      You're right, nobody deserves to die - at least while they are held to be innocent. Just like the cops that were recently murdered due to angry people who saw these cops who likely had nothing to do with the recent riots and took their lives so needlessly while they were innocent from them. Yet you don't seem to hear liberals who are all for the black lives matter riots speaking out about that. In fact, it's been reported of someone who had a social media who said that they didn't care about the murders happening and that they pretty much deserved it (directly or indirectly said, still pretty much led to it either way) and it went viral to the point their page was shut down. Last I heard, the person who owned the page and claimed such wants to go after the person who exposed them to begin with. It's pretty much parallel to these 'leaders' like Sharpton, who demands about equality and the injustice in the black community but nothing is said when a black person is at fault, if anything pretty much a 'screw you' in response even if there's lack of it. If Martin Luther King Jr. were to be alive today, I highly doubt that he would be proud to see how much we've progressed since his time. Different setting, same division if not more tense. The difference between Sharpton and MLK Jr. is that Sharpton is a hypocrite who instills hate within the black community as well as any other who supports him. MLK Jr. wanted to bring the folks together while going on protests that don't consists of 'dead cops' as part of their speech while pulling the trigger.

    • Wanda Harper profile image

      Wanda Harper 

      3 years ago from New York, New York

      Apparently somebody's not reading, watching the news, headlines, or getting the facts. In the past month UNARMED men and boys have been murdered. All of them Black.

      I'm very proud to see peaceful demonstrators of all nationalities performing die-ins in respect to these tragedies. Check out Twitter's #crimingwhilewhite.

      I read profanity, no details, and no facts in your comment, Dylan. Peace!

    • Cassidy Kakin profile imageAUTHOR

      Cassidy Michael Kakin 

      3 years ago from San Jose, California

      ^It is not STRICTLY a race issue, but the officer's choice to use lethal force rather than to "shoot to maim" was likely influenced by Martin's race

    • profile image

      Dylan 

      3 years ago

      If you pull a gun on a cop you are going to get put down regardless of race for pete fucking sake. This is not a race issue.

    • Wanda Harper profile image

      Wanda Harper 

      3 years ago from New York, New York

      We are in agreement, Cassidy. I do put police on a higher standard than civilians. They are trained to use other skills to subdue civilians like you and I. But today it's shoot first and not just once in many cases. As in any job or any group of individuals there's one or two people that set the tone of morality. Patrol offices and those in cruisers are to be held accountable for their actions; however, the tone comes from the moral standards of management.

      I know their jobs are not easy, but if the kitchen is too hot leave. If you can't handle the pressure leave. To tell you the truth I don't think more and more training will suffice. I think training is a scapegoat to pacify the events; the problem higher management, peer pressure, and not standing for what's right / just. And that's probably I would think the most difficult thing to do. As a cop you may find yourself calling for backup and no one answers. That's my take. Great hub!

    • Cassidy Kakin profile imageAUTHOR

      Cassidy Michael Kakin 

      3 years ago from San Jose, California

      ^I contend that he did not deserve it; namely because NO ONE deserves to get gunned down without a trial especially (maybe he had psychosis issues? maybe a long prison sentence would be a better solution for Martin, his family, and our society?) and because the officer did not have to use lethal force (and likely chose to based on race...)

    • profile image

      Looks like anyone can be a journalist these days 

      3 years ago

      You make different points, but faiked to address the main only important point. He's armed, pointed the gun, and gets shot.

      He deserved it.

    • Cassidy Kakin profile imageAUTHOR

      Cassidy Michael Kakin 

      3 years ago from San Jose, California

      "...their innocence?" I agree! Innocent until proven guilty is what our country is founded upon.

    • peachpurple profile image

      peachy 

      3 years ago from Home Sweet Home

      No one should die, everyone should be given a chance to prove

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)