ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • Social Issues

September 11, 2001: OH NO! Not Another 9/11 Conspiracy Theory! UGH! But Wait, Listen ...

Updated on February 5, 2017

9/11 Short News Footage Compilation

It is not Disrespectful

Anytime people lose their lives, other people want to know "what happened". When murder happens, people want to know the truth, and they want justice. It does not matter what example we use; it is always the same. When people die, we want truth and justice. In cases of murder (especially when a lot of people have died), finding out who, what, when, where, why, how, and all the details is usually a priority -- this is a normal reaction to such a situation. Upon understanding and coming to terms with the details of the situation, then "serving justice" to guilty parties is always the most important thing to everyone involved -- especially to families of those who have been lost.

It is not disrespect, or dishonor, to examine these things. In order to properly show "honor and respect" in cases of mass murder and terrorism such as what happened on 9/11, we have to look at all of the facts. We have to examine all the possibilities, and look at all available information -- with an open mind. We must then come to a truly logical conclusion -- based on facts.

If we were to look away, and dismiss certain information concerning a murder, that would "dishonor and disrespect" those who lost their lives -- and their families.

9/11 was the "worst terror attack on America in its history"; over 3,000 people died that day. As a result, the whole world has been radically altered and fundamentally changed. Why would we ever look away from it? Why would we not investigate this event to the fullest, and explore every possibility? Why would we not look at everything we possibly can to understand what happened?

History repeats itself, if we forget; "looking away" is just an easy way of forgetting -- "out of sight out of mind". We cannot let history repeat itself; therefore, we cannot look away. Looking away does not honor or respect anyone. 9/11 was so important, and so trans-formative, that it does not matter how many times we go over it. We should go over it again and again, until no one anywhere has even one question remaining. All of the questions must be answered with absolute certainty before we can ever say we have been over this enough. As long as there is one person with one question, we have not gone over it enough. If not the event itself, the effects of 9/11 make it important enough to go over -- as many times as it takes.

Generally, upon posing questions about 9/11, people will dismiss you as being "on the fringes"; they immediately call you a "conspiracy theorist" (as if that is sufficient reason to dismiss anyone), but have no fear and do not worry -- you are not alone. Polls consistently show that vast numbers of people "have questions" about the "official story" of 9/11 -- especially when they become aware of Building 7, which was included nowhere in the 9/11 Commission Report. That alone makes it obvious that the 9/11 Commission Report cannot be complete or accurate.

Consistently, polls show that more than half of the people have "problems" with the official story. When asked if they have "questions" about the official story, even more people admitted that they did. Turns out, that an overwhelming majority of people have "at least some questions" concerning the completeness and accuracy of the 9/11 Commission Report. When it all comes down to it: more people believe there is "something wrong" with the official story than believe that the official story is "completely accurate". It is the minority who accept the "official story" without question; the majority believe "something is wrong" with the 9/11 Commission Report.

9/11 Conspiracy Theories Tend to Upset People

Just Another Conspiracy Theory

As soon as we hear "9/11 conspiracy theory", many people "tune out" right away. Immediately they pass judgement and say things like, "Nothing like that could or would ever happen." Instantly, they will dismiss anyone presenting any information that contradicts what they believe. Often, people in such states of denial will proclaim that "it would not be possible for so many people to keep such a secret"; they are exactly right in saying so, because "they" could not and did not "keep it a secret" -- we know what happened. If they were able to keep it a secret, we wouldn't have the information that we do; they were unable to keep it a secret

A "conspiracy theory" is nothing more than a theory that there was a conspiracy. A "conspiracy" is when people get together, in secret, and plan to do something illegal. The 9/11 Commission Report is just that; it is a conspiracy theory, but it is the "official" conspiracy theory -- so that makes it OK. Since it is "official" that makes it absolutely correct and complete, right? Since the "official" story is indeed, undeniably, and absolutely, a "conspiracy theory"; we should then simply dismiss it off the top, right? If all "conspiracy theories" are lunacy, then the 9/11 Commission Report should be considered crazy -- and dismissed right away. By the very definition, the "official story" is a "conspiracy theory".

The "official conspiracy theory" of 9/11 says: 19 Muslim fanatics hijacked four commercial airliners using box cutters. Then, the hijackers crashed three of the hijacked planes into three different buildings -- overcoming a 400 billion dollar defense system. All this, under the command of another radical Muslim, on a laptop computer -- hiding in a cave -- somewhere in Afghanistan. That sounds like a ridiculous conspiracy theory if there ever was one; someone somewhere is rolling on the floor laughing hysterically over this. How could anyone ever believe that? It is utterly ridiculous -- how could that possibly be anything other than nonsense? It couldn't be, because it is nonsense.

9/11: South Tower Collapse video compilation

Controlled Demolition

The World Trade Towers were constructed to withstand planes crashing into them. Inside the towers were 47 steel columns going up through the center of each building. Aluminum planes, that are constructed to be light enough to fly through the air, cannot penetrate steel columns.

We never see anything about the steel columns when they show the "official story" of 9/11 on TV every year. They show us how the buildings came down in a "pancake" type of collapse; each floor falls unobstructed down to the next from top to bottom. It was so perfect how they came down -- as if there were no columns in the center. The buildings went down exactly as they would have if there was absolutely nothing at all in between the floors.

The Twin Towers fell all the way to the ground at nearly free fall speed; this is simply not possible -- unless all resistance was removed. The "official story" suggests there was "enough jet fuel" and that jet fuel can somehow become "hot enough" to "sufficiently weaken" the inner structure of the buildings, allowing them to fall as they did -- it is exhaustively difficult to believe this. There would have had to have been much more jet fuel, a whole lot more time, and significantly more heat than what jet fuel can produce to even begin to believe this nonsense. To completely remove all resistance, all the way down the building, would require something much more powerful than "jet fuel" -- it's just absurd that anyone would believe this. Even if jet fuel was, by some miracle of physics, capable of causing such a disaster, how could "jet fuel" have caused the buildings to come down so precisely and so perfectly as they did? These buildings went straight to the ground -- no supports, no columns, no structure -- just a free falling building with nothing slowing it down. Jet fuel did this? Yes, sure it did, please tell me in what imaginary universe this all took place -- is the insanity not obvious?

Videos of the two buildings coming down, show very clearly that something extremely explosive was happening. It is obvious that floors below the collapsing floors were being "blown out" -- it looks exactly the same as every controlled demolition. The "official story" defies physics; it is impossible. The evidence is simply overwhelming: a "controlled demolition" was the true cause of the World Trade Tower collapses.

BBC Reports 911, WTC 7 Collapse BEFORE it Happens

Building 7

"Building 7", also known as the Salomon Brothers building, came down exactly the same way -- exactly the same way -- in an identical fashion as to how both of the Twin Towers came down. Now, we have three buildings coming down in this same way; what are the odds of that? Just buildings dropping here and there, happens all the time, huh? Nothing strange here. Don't ask any questions -- move along.

Twenty minutes before Building 7 went down, a BBC News broadcast was reporting Building 7 had already gone down, but it hadn't yet. In fact, Building 7 could be seen still standing -- in the video -- while the reporter was announcing that it had collapsed. It just does not get any more ridiculous (and obvious) than this. How could this be? Somebody knew -- in advance -- that's how.

No plane hit Building 7; it only sustained a small fire. There was no major structural damage at all, but somehow it came down exactly the same way as the other two buildings. How did this happen? Nothing like this has ever happened before, or since; this has never happened to any other building -- in the entire history of the world.

Why was Building 7 not included in the 9/11 Commission Report? It went down on the same day, in exactly the same manner as the Twin Towers, and was a direct result of the same attack, "officially" anyway. So, why was it never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report?

Operation Northwoods Exposed

Operation Northwoods

People will tell you that a "false flag" attack could not happen -- "not in the United States of America", but there is evidence to the contrary.

There was a plan brought to President Kennedy in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff called "Operation Northwoods". Kennedy did not go along with it; there was a whole lot that JFK refused to go along with, which was "very problematic" for certain people. He ended up shutting the whole "operation" down, but it just goes to show; our government would indeed stage "false flag" events.

"Operation Northwoods" was very detailed and well-thought-out. The plan was to set off bombs, sink ships, and hijack planes (which were to be crashed or blown up) in an attempt to manipulate the American people into supporting military actions in Cuba; today we call this "terrorism". The United States Government, did, in fact, plan terror, terrorism, and terrorist acts. This is not somebody's opinion; this is directly from declassified "official" government documents. If not for John F. Kennedy, "they" would have carried out the fake attacks -- no, they sure wouldn't "ever do anything like that", now would they? Of course they would, they always do things like that. The whole idea was to blame it all on Fidel Castro to justify an invasion of Cuba. They even planned to have fake evidence to "make sure the public supported military action in Cuba".

Operation Northwoods would have been our own government committing acts of "terrorism" on the American people, and manipulating them into war -- all based on lies. Does this sound at all like 9/11, and the following invasion of Iraq? What did Iraq have to do with 9/11? Nothing. The 9/11 attacks were something very similar to Operation Northwoods, but there was no one like JFK to stop it -- we had George W. Bush, who probably would have happily gone along with Operation Northwoods.

How many characteristics of a "duck" must something have before we can "officially" declare it to be a "duck"? It's a duck!

Follow the Money

Four Billion Dollars

The World Trade Towers belonged to the Port Authority, and were built on land owned by the Rockefellers. Some people, including the owners, really did not like the buildings; they were "not profitable" and they "blocked the skyline". The South Tower was only half occupied, and both buildings were getting old; they were 30 years old at the time of the 9/11 terror attack, and in serious need of repair. The owners decided to have the buildings "torn down", but the city would not allow them to do so; there was too much asbestos in the buildings to allow for them to be torn down. This left the owners "stuck with" buildings they "did not want".

Several weeks before the 9/11 attacks, renovations had begun on the buildings; there was a lot of stuff going on during that time. Trucks and supplies were moving in and out; some people have claimed that "huge truckloads of gold" were removed from the towers during the time of these so-called "renovations". Employees and residents reported hearing a tremendous amount of activity, and they said there was "dust everywhere".

Larry Silverstein, one of the owners, had taken out a huge insurance policy just before the attacks -- that ended up paying him over $4 billion. The policy was to protect against a "terrorist attack", what are the odds of that? Silverstein became able, because of the attacks, to get rid of the buildings he didn't want anymore; he also made off like a bandit, raking in four and a half billion dollars -- things worked out very nicely for Mr. Silverstein, now didn't they?

RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11 / LIVE LEAK

Before the Pentagon Collapsed

The Pentagon

Photographs of the Pentagon, before the wall collapsed, show a hole that looks to be about 12 feet by 20 feet. Upon examining all the pictures of the Pentagon that day: the lawn is OK, cars are OK, windows are OK, and there is just this one little hole in the side of the building -- this could not have been a plane. How could something with a 125 foot wingspan, and a tail that is 45 feet high, fit into a hole that is only 12 by 20? How did an aluminum plane make a hole in the first place? This is the Pentagon we are talking about here -- It is one of the most protected and reinforced buildings in the world. How could a plane puncture a hole in that building? It didn't -- because it couldn't. Where are the titanium engines, and the holes that they would have made if a "plane" is what penetrated the side of the Pentagon? In pictures, before the wall collapsed, these holes are nowhere ... and what happened to the engines; where did they go? The engines were never found, but titanium jet engines cannot just disappear. If there were no engines at the "crash" site, there was no plane there either -- it was a missile -- not a plane, that flew into the Pentagon.

Experts say that those type of planes (Boeing 757s) "cannot do" what the "official story" says they did. Other experts have explained that inexperienced pilots, as the hijackers are supposed to have been, "could have never executed those maneuvers". According to experts, no one could have ever gotten a "757" to do anything close to what it is supposed to have done. No matter how skilled the pilot -- that plane could not have made the maneuvers necessary for it to strike the Pentagon as we are told it did; it is just not possible. The laws of physics will once again need to be rearranged to accommodate the "official" version -- it just doesn't work -- it's never going to work.

Why did they wait so long and pay so little for an investigation?

Two Years Late and only 15 Million Bucks

The day after the Pearl Harbor attack, a commission was created to find out what happened. The day after JFK was assassinated, a commission was created to find out what happened. It was two years after 9/11 before there was an investigation; it was as if they already knew what happened. Only people who already know what happened don't feel the need to do investigations. The "worst attack on American soil in history", and for 2 years no investigation at all? Does that not seem odd?

Originally, George W. Bush did not even want to have an investigation; why would he have not wanted an investigation? Was Bush afraid of what an investigation might reveal? After being pressured, he finally agreed to spend $3 million on an investigation; the total ended up around $15 million. $15 million spent to find out everything about the "worst attack" on America in its history? What kind of nonsense is that? $15 million is not a lot of money, not compared to the amounts of money governments spend it isn't. This amount might be sufficient if all the answers have been provided, but that is not the case at all -- many questions still remain. In relation to other things, like 700 billion dollar bank bailouts, $15 million is really not that much money. It is also not very much money at all for an "investigation" of the "worst thing that has ever happened before" -- it is an insignificant amount of money, at best. That's how much someone would pay if they did not want any answers; that's how much you pay when you don't want the truth revealed.

They spent four times that much to get George W. Bush re-elected in 2004, which was $60 million. Our government spent $175 million investigating the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster. They spent $152 million on the Columbia disaster investigation, and $30 million investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal, this goes on and on -- it is ridiculous. They spent more money trying to figure out what happened between "Bill and Monica" than they did on the "worst terror attack" in American history! Insane! Does it not seem odd that they would spend so very little -- basically nothing -- to investigate the "worst attack" in history? $15 million? Really? What an insult, what an abomination, and what a massive betrayal to the American people -- it is somewhere far beyond any words to describe such a disgusting act of filth.

George W. Bush

"No one in government had imagined such an attack."
"No one in government had imagined such an attack."

Drills

At the exact time of the 9/11 attacks, there were "drills" happening -- for the exact same thing. According to George W. Bush, "No one could have imagined anything like terrorists flying planes into buildings." If that were true, why did the government have drills going on at the same time, that involved "planes flying into the World Trade Towers"? Obviously, someone did imagine this before it happened.

It should not be a surprise to anyone to hear that a politician has lied. We know they lie all the time, but Bush flat out lied about this -- right to our faces. So has the entire news media, yet we continue to buy their story and ridicule those who bring up any of this information -- it's pathetic. If Bush lied about 9/11 once, and if the media lied about it too, might they have told more lies as well? If so, does that not obviously scream for a new investigation of 9/11? If the "official story" of 9/11 is a sham, everything based on it would also be a sham. The whole thing is a sham, and it's all based on lies. if 9/11 was a lie, we are in some very serious trouble as a nation and as a people.

People tend to think this is preposterous and absurd, but a quick check of history reveals that all governments throughout all of history have always done things just like this. Why is it impossible to think this could be the case with 9/11? What makes it impossible? Nothing. It might be difficult to consider such things, but we must.

A large number of drills and exercises were going on at the same time as the attacks, and no one (those who normally would have done something about an attack) really knew what was actually happening. How were radar and flight controllers supposed to know the difference between the "real" and "simulated" attacks when they were nearly identical? If the two flight paths (one of the drills, the other of the attacks) are laid over the top of one another, it is impossible to tell the difference. How could it be that the very people, who would have protected our country, did not because they "thought it was a drill" instead of a real event? How could "terrorist" have known how the "drills" were going to look, so that they could pull off the attacks undetected? What are the chances of that? Something, very strange indeed, is going on here. We would need a very large calculator in order to figure the odds of that happening purely by chance.

The people at the radars (those who could have prevented the attacks) were deliberately confused into standing by and doing nothing. Who could have done that? Could Osama Bin Laden (in a cave somewhere) have done that? Someone had to have known something in order to have pulled this off, whoever it was. This was something that could have only been done by someone who really knew what was going on with America, inside and out. Much skill and knowledge was required to pull this off, could Osama Bin Laden ever have done it? It's blatant -- Osama Bin Laden could never have done anything even close to 9/11.

We Must Save Our Country

America might Never be the Same

America might never be the same after 9/11. Our country today is very much a different place than it was before the attacks. Since then, we have seen our Constitution , and our freedoms, be gradually withered away; this all in the name of "security". It is almost as if that were the entire purpose of the attacks on 9/11.

Whoever really did this horrible thing, we may never know for sure; but if the goal was to "change our ideas about freedom", they have gotten exactly what they wanted.

Many people want a new and independent investigation into what really happened on 9/11; others just want the conspiracy theorists to "shut up". It seems that with all the nonsense our government spends money on, any time they feel like it, a new investigation could be something easily done. If you want the conspiracy theorists to "shut up", have a new investigation. It's going to have to be one that honestly and truly addresses all of the issues, and one that "looks away" from nothing.

This article has barely scratched the surface; there is so much more. Hopefully, one day, we will have the courage to confront this fully head-on. We need to do a proper and complete investigation, and deal with the consequences of that investigation -- no matter what they are.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Brie Hoffman profile image

      Brie Hoffman 2 years ago from Manhattan

      Very good article..anyone who believes the official government cover-up story about 9-11 is an idiot!

    • profile image

      Harold L Cokayne 22 months ago

      Two comments.....

      1. follow the $$$ trail and will show the sources of the accountability....

      2. Where are the 200+ missing people....

      Bonus...

      MH370....

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 22 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      Very good article, I like the way you present the facts and ask us if this is believable. Which of course it is not.

      So the real question now is, what do we do about it, now that the majority of humans on this planet not just Americans but the entire globe know that it is a lie . . . how do we find justice?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 22 months ago from Orange County California

      Good article and I agree with it. Calling something a Conspiracy Theory allows people to dismiss anything in it.

      Forget about conspiracy, there was not a single defensive act by the entire military. Not a single armed plane, and Andrews Air Force base couldn't even protect the capital. NORAD, the FAA, CIA, FBI, and all the rest of the three letter agencies were useless on 911, as the US was on Dec 7, 1941.

      Same flaw, same success by the enemy.

      They might get you to believe that one of the two towers could have free felled, but having both of them, don't think so. Then as you mentioned add in WTC 7, that wasn't hit at all.

      We wouldn't need professional and expert demolition companies if it was that easy.

      Forget about the conspiracy, let them prove the math. Forget politics, this is a matter of science and engineering.

      And where was the fourth hijacked? plane going

      What was the target

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 22 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      What is even more interesting but rarely gets any attention is the hi-jack protocols put in place by airline companies in the 90s to prevent the very thing that happened in 2001 from taking place.

      According to my research, every U.S. airliner was equipped with remote control software that would allow it to be flown remotely and landed safely in case of a hi-jacking, there was even a movie made about that very scenario using the software.

      So that being said why wasn't it used to prevent the planes from going anywhere near a city let alone a building?

      Then you throw in the fact that these hi-jackers were somehow able to get the entire U.S. Military to stand down, hello anybody home?

      It is like they wanted everyone to recognize how foolish the whole thing was portrayed as, the amount of coincidence is impossible to accept.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 22 months ago from Orange County California

      What I also find amazing is the average person being so willing to ignore all the facts.

      These hijackers couldn't have gotten enough training from light planes. Something is missing here as well.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 22 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      Exactly, so when confronted with fact after fact that doesn't compute the only logically conclusion left, must be the truth.

      Every U.S. commercial airliner is equipped with a speed dial button located throughout the cockpit and cabin that allows pilots and stewardesses to press once in case of a hi-jacking.

      This wasn't used once on any of the four planes, at any time. At no point did any pilot (all ex-military) follow any of their training for hi-jack scenarios.

      19 hi-jacker with box cutters over powered ex military pilots and pulled off a high precision military exercise with detailed timing, controlled by a man in a cave with a laptop a half a world away that somehow disabled the mightiest military in the world.

      Simplest explanation would be that no commercial aircraft were used, that drones or smart missiles were used with holographic overlays from AWACs seen over NYC and DC.

      Remember the U.S. Military bragged about how sophisticated their holographic technology was in Desert Storm, that it could even fool radar and eye-witnesses couldn't tell the difference.

      Then when you throw in MIT and Boeings report in 2006 that both planes exceeded the flight speed either plane was capable of below 30,000 feet, when they both hit the twin towers and you realize that commercial airliners could not have been used.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 22 months ago from Orange County California

      I am focusing on what happened and not who did it, but your points are well taken.

      By looking at the facts, we see a lot of anomalies, and we can't be satisfied by the government's conclusions on them.

      The average person appears to be satisfied by the government reports, and that is the crux of the problem.

      Here is another Anomaly.

      Why should protocol make NORAD have to wait for the FAA to declare an Emergency for them to take control. A civilian agency is going to make a decision for the Military, now that is failure in a coffee cup. Just stir it to see the failure rise to the top.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 22 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      In the 80s a software company in the U.S.A., (Inslaw) produced some software called PROMIS, which was then given to the MOSSAD, who in turn created a 'backdoor' program and began installing (embedding) it into computers around the world, however this was done secretly for spying purposes.

      This software allowed them to manipulate the screens of other computers remotely. Ostensibly it was used to allow different agencies to access each others computers and share information but by the late 90s it had found its way into the computers of the Defense, Energy and Treasury Dept.'s, the White House, the Secret Service, the A.F. & Navy, the FAA & NORAD, the CIA and the FBI, Congress and the Senate.

      However on 9/11 it was put to full use by altering the radar screens of NORAD and the FAA, giving false readings and scrambling signals.

      For more information and source material read Methodical Illusion, it is short and to the point without naming names but any one with half a brain can make the connections.

      My point is that when the Flight Termination Systems (FTS) were installed in ALL U.S. airliners in the 90s, most pilots were against the idea because, once the plane was taken over remotely, ALL communication to and from the cockpit was cut-off or terminated, even from the cabin crew, stewardesses, other planes, everyone.

      So the reason that neither the stewardesses or pilots hit the 7500 hi-jack buzzer located throughout the airplane is that the cabin crew didn't know that the FTS had been activated and the pilots just thought they had a mechanical failure.

      The plane is flown remotely to a local A.F. base on alert as part of the military exercises going on that day, landed and then the passengers and crew, probably at gunpoint, are then forced to make the weird phone calls using their cell phones which of course would work once they landed.

      Anybody knows that even today cell phones don't work once you get above about 5,000 feet, so the cell phone thing was always weird until you read the transcripts, then you understand why they were made part of the story, to introduce the hijack story, otherwise no one would have known . . .

      convoluted but so is murder.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 22 months ago from Orange County California

      That is very interesting.

      As to the cell phones, do we know at what altitude these planes were flying?

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 22 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      According to the FAA we do as they keep records of this but as I related above some of these records could be false data designed to confuse the story.

      According to Air Traffic Controllers some of the flight path records has the planes flying at speeds that are impossible for Boeing 767's at such altitudes and some at any altitude. Some of the data has these planes approaching Mach 1 (at sea level that would be over 760 mph), which would tear the wings of a commercial airliner.

      At 8,000 feet all cell phone communication is lost, below that is intermittent, below 5,000 feet it gets significantly better. I believe Ray Griffen wrote a book about it, if your interested, I could find the title.

      Here is the thing, the Bureau of Transportation and Safety has no record of Flight 11 & 77 being scheduled to fly that day and no record of either plane taking off from either Dulles or Boston that day.

      So if they weren't scheduled how did anyone buy a ticket?

      Obviously the passenger manifest are fake.

      The cell phone transcripts is the only evidence the 9/11 Commission Report found for hijackings to having occurred. That and a passport found at Ground Zero . . . but if you are going to hijack a plane and fly it into a building what do you need your passport for?

      All you need is your boarding pass and maybe a fake ID but you don't need your passport and if the fire melted steel and disintegrated the plane and your body . . . how come your passport survived?

      The official version is too hard to believe once you begin to read all the evidence.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      There is much I did not go into in this article, including many of the things mentioned. I may write about them in the future. I think when we look at all of it, everything, it is obvious. We were supposed to know. Someone somewhere wanted us to know.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      I will venture a prophecy and will hazard a guess that the responsible parties will be arrested within 6 months of today to stand trial for this crime against humanity . . . and that it will only be the very tip of the iceberg but will get the ball rolling in a tribunal that will last a decade against a Cabal of criminals that reads like a who's who of celebrities, politicians and the rich elite.

      Too many people have awoken to this crime and to the crimes that have been perpetrated against generation after generation on this planet.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      What has indicated this to you? Why would you say something like arrests will happen within the next 6 months? I just don't see anything in our world that would point toward something like that. How have you come to this idea?

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      Constant research, listening to part of the BBC Snowden material, Listening to Corey Goode and David Wilcock interviews on Gaiam TV, paying attention to information coming out of Russia and alternative News sources outside the USA.

      Reading Methodical Illusion and Deception by Rebeka Roth, which are really good but show that far too many people now have awoken to the deception.

      Recognizing that large data dumps are going to happen soon from insider sources, many insiders sources coming forward now with information, a wide variety of sources flooding the internet wit information that reveals not just that 9/11 was a false flag event but who actually perpetrated the crimes.

      I just can't see this information revolution even lasting 6 months I would say sooner but was being conservative, way too much damning information revealing the Cabal is being given to the public.

      The Fake Stream Media censors all of it but when you begin to get your news from sources outside the USA you will see how much info the public is getting.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      An Event will happen before the end of the year which will galvanize the public into demanding answers to some serious questions revealed by this Event which will be a technological data dump.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      OK, you asked me where I get my information and I will provide some links to get the ball rolling. The first is from a site calling themselves Who Needs Light which is the title to a book of the same name by the author and website owner. It basically channels messages from Ascended masters and the Federation but the information coincides with a lot of other information from Govt. Insiders and researchers and I deem it trust worthy.

      http://myemail.constantcontact.com/The-New-Earth-T...

      The second is David Wilcocks site which is mostly research but since David is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce there are some esoteric and other stuff going on but he has had two best sellers into scientific research that are literally Earth shattering awesome books.

      http://divinecosmos.com/

      The third is from the Govt. Insider Corey Goode and his website the Sphere Being Alliance which also has information on it that can't be found anywhere else.

      http://spherebeingalliance.com/blog

      It all comes back to a concerted effort by an Alliance that is trying to defeat The Cabal and if you pay attention to world events from sources outside the USA you will recognize that they are getting really close to making this a reality.

      Read the first link to get a good overall picture, the second article says it all.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      I do get news and information from many sources including those outside the USA. I am also familiar with much of what you are talking about. I see the information dump coming as you said, but I am not convinced any such changes will occur in the next year. I do not know, but I am paying attention.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      Good, perhaps I'm being overly optimistic, which is quite possible or if you subscribe to the concept that we are co-creators of our own reality merely by saying it will happen could actually force a Full Disclosure Event to begin.

      I was just reading some information and thinking about what you would make of it and how you would present the information.

      Have you heard of Otis Carr a protege of Nikola Tesla who created a fully operational 45 foot spacecraft in 1959/60, which would have been the third civilian space program developed if you include the Vril Societies efforts in the 20s and Guglielmo Marconi's in the 30s.

      Considering how any free energy technology would've changed the USA and World's economies overnight and made the oil based economy obsolete it isn't any wonder these inventors and programs got squashed but I feel it is the responsibility of small time writers/researchers and seekers such as ourselves to get the word out and make this information accessible and common-place.

      You have unique way of presenting information that I thoroughly enjoy and appreciate and wish that I could present information in such a way but my style is more matter of fact, take it or leave it and it has for the most part worked for me.

      If we continue to present the censored past in a way that seems real, more people will awaken and research themselves.

      The book I was reading is Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Alliances by Michael E. Salla, PH.D. (2015), which no doubt you have heard of.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      I think we each have our own individual expression and none is better than any other. It is going to take all of us continually presenting this information in our own unique ways to eventually create a new situation. My way will appeal to some, but not to others. Your way will appeal to some who do not like my way at all. I think we are each in our own place and all of us are exactly where in the journey we are supposed to be. I often find frustration because the information is so big it can never be issued out effectively all at one time. I generally see these things happening very slowly over a long period of time. I often remind myself that it was the tortoise who won the race not the hare. I strive to be the tortoise. Slow steady gradual progress like Fabian Gradualism. Eventually, I will get to all of these topics.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      I certainly wouldn't describe the evolution of mankind in such terms but I do also think that humanity has gradually evolved in leaps and bounds. Meaning that we seem to go along for a while and then make great advances in knowledge.

      However this time around a small percentage knew what was coming and has tried to suppress it, of course this is where we come in by trying to reveal it.

      I like the way you constantly ask the questions while revealing the answers.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 21 months ago from Orange County California

      jason

      The sad thing about this subject is how many people can view it without commenting.

      Like Political Correctness, using the words Conspiracy Theory seems to be a wall between the events, and the conclusions made by the government.

      PC has become the anti speech mechanism, and Conspiracy Theories have been shunted to ground just by its label.

      Unfortunately, commissions and investigations have not found the veracity of the events they are tasked with finding out the answers. It seems that these investigations are a thin veneer to hide the truth.

      While it may be possible to buy into the WTC 1 911 commission conclusion of melting core structures. Even though, not one skyscraper has completely collapsed to the ground from fires.

      Nevertheless, adding the WTC 2 911 commission conclusion which is the same as the WTC 1 conclusion is harder to justify. The two planes hit the towers at different levels, and from different directions.

      Yet, the commission comes up with the very same conclusion for both of them. This is like getting two royal flush poker hands at the adjoining card tables at a single casino in Vegas.

      OK, once we get past those astronomical odds, how can the commission then conclude the same for WTC 7. No planes hit it, and it is a different structure.

      back to my point, why is there no interest in the public find out how these three buildings have exactly the same result.

      It is the apathy of the people that really is the core of the problem. Without that apathy, these investigations couldn't pass off their conclusions with such impunity.

      Put aside the label of conspiracy theory, meaning don't focus on who, but how was it possible to have these identical results for non identical events, and two different structures.

      Like most conspiracy theories, there is an absence of evidence, or more accurately the evidence hasn't been preserved for the investigation.

      We sold all the metal from the WTC buildings to the Chinese.

      This was evidence, and independent of the 911 commission, they were necessary to determine the reasons for its failure, to make sure it would never happen again, and to look at existing structures around the country to see if any of them have similar faults.

      But none of this was done.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      Obama and the Pope have recently mentioned conspiracy theories. Didn't the CIA create this term just so they could discredit anyone bringing up anything like this? I think they did. We better listen to the Pope and the president though and avoid these topics if we know what is good for us right? :)

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 21 months ago from Orange County California

      Jason

      I think that you are on to something.

      shhh

      I was never here.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      All joking aside, it is amazing how much information about this there is compared to what people actually know. In the article, I just barely touched the stuff that everyone really should already know about, but they do not know. If they do know they don't care. How bad do things really have to get before everyone will finally look at what is happening?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 21 months ago from Orange County California

      Jason

      I wish that I knew why most people just aren't interested in looking at events and questioning the reports. Especially when it just doesn't sound right.

      Even when they look at things they don't question what they have heard, or seen.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      It's called censorship and it works, the collapse of Building Seven has never been shown on Fake Stream Media in the USA.

      People like Judy Wood and Pilots for 9/11 or Architects for 9/11 don't get air time on TV News Stations, at all. More people accept UFOs and Aliens than the truth about 9/11.

      Now just recently Rebekah Roth and her book Methodical Illusion (really good read BTW) has been getting some press but mostly just to mock her.

      This is because the MSM was in on the deception, look at how Dan Rather was fired for questioning the official story even before the 9/11 Commission Report was printed.

    • Jason Horne profile image
      Author

      Jason Horne 21 months ago

      I am currently working on an article that talks about how people do tend to be more accepting of UFOs and aliens while being less accepting of secret societies and conspiracy theories even though they are the same subject. It does seem to have a lot to do with TV and movies. You can talk about aliens, that is OK, but how dare you mention a conspiracy! How dare you! :) It seems this is by design and will help facilitate the coming alien deception.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      Of course, since our Masters are masters of disinformation and seem to be getting their collective butts kicked by said Aliens and the Secret Space Alliance, then I think its safe to say they Want us to not accept the truth when these Aliens do land.

      Here my thinking, they keep putting out these ridiculous false flag events that are easily seen through and revealed, as a "A Boy Who Cried Wolf" scenario.

      They do this so that people will begin to ignore the news and not trust the media, so when a real data dump or Full Disclosure Event happens in the near future, everybody thinks . . . "It's just another scare tactic false flag scenario" and ignore it, even though it is real.

      This double dealing false flag scenario stuff is what they are really after too, to so confuse the public they don't know who to trust. However I think where they will get in trouble is that the MIC is going to arrest some folks and charge them with treason and that will start the flow of evidence.

      Only when most of the Cabal has been removed from power will Aliens reveal themselves. What you may not know is that many 'Aliens' are really underground breakaway ancient human societies posing as Aliens.

      Hollow Earth is real but grossly misunderstood and this is done by both those that live there and the Cabal.

      Anyway I look forward to the article.

    • somethgblue profile image

      somethgblue 21 months ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      For clarification purposes and to have some further details to consider when writing this article of yours, I think it is important to understand that to prevent a Full Disclosure Event from happening, The Cabal may plan a Partial Disclosure Event as a means of controlling the information and the story.

      What this would entail is revealing Secret Space Programs some technology and the release of evidence and proof of Aliens, UFOs and space colonies.

      This would be shocking to some but would distract them from recognizing the crimes The Cabal have perpetrated on humanity for generations among them the trafficking of slaves to Alien races for sex, labor and food and their own slave labor colonies on Mars the Moon and other planets.

      This is probably the biggest threat to Full Disclosure that I see. What must be recognized is that the Quarantine of Earth 75,000 years ago has only been partial successful and very porous an Alien race could have easily taken over our race without it however Service To Self Aliens serve a greater purpose by creating polarity and division.

      You can't have good without evil, light without dark, so they are forcing us to choose but any successful Ascension scenario requires balance between the choices, so that is why RA and the Sphere Being Alliance (SBA) has stepped in now to make sure enough Service To Other humans have the chance to Ascend.

      This required that the SBA (RA) create a complete Quarantine without holes or gaps that would prevent the Draconians and Cabal from creating a complete take over or even use their Nibiru Planet X mother-ship to create another flood event.

      I know this is a lot to take in but if you haven't read the Law of One or RA Material now would be a good time to do so. Micahel Salla also explains the complex scenario well.

    • profile image

      Chris Topher 10 months ago

      Thank you Jason for this terrific article. I really wonder sometimes how people so sternly deny the truth about this terrible event. I guess most people just don't care. Then you have this Trump thing rearing its ugly head and it really gets you wondering. Thanks for trying. I wish I could write as well as you but I can't. I know you are right though. Tip of the cap to sometthingblue as well.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 10 months ago from Orange County California

      Jason

      Putting aside who did what during 911, the simple physics of what happened can't be explained. As far as I know, there have been no other skyscrapers free falling from fires. And this would certainly apply to WTC 7 because there was nothing but a fire.

      People are as you say made speechless when someone mentions CT. And many people buy into the CT and wouldn't believe the truth if they saw it.

      Free fall high rise building demolition has to be done by experts, how much explosive, where to put, and synchronize the detonation. Any timing or miscalc on the charges and it won't free fall straight down.

      WTC 1 and 2 were hit at different floors, and yet they both came down the same way???And WTC7 not hit at all. As well as all the other details you mentioned.

      For a new investigation on 911, we don't have much physical evidence as all or almost all of the metal from the building went to China???

      The other interesting question is what was the fourth target?

    • Sgt Prepper profile image

      Gunny Cracker 9 months ago from Elkhorn, WI

      The ONLY "conspiracy theory" I dismiss entirely is The Report of the 9/11 Commission. WTC-6 implosion? The Five Dancing Jews?

    • profile image

      Sanxuary 6 months ago

      There is thousand things wrong with this story. The 911 commission actually made it worst. In practicaaly all incidents such as these the evidence is stored for years. I wonder if any evidence even exist? How come no follow ups have never been allowed? If it was not our country that did this why do I remain unconvinced that Bin Laden had anything to do with it? The criminals were all from Saudi Araibia. Like I said way to many quetions unanswered with anything convincing.

    Click to Rate This Article