For those so 2nd ammendment rights oriented, perhaps we should go back to the original document? Lose all the changes over the years and just follow what so many are debating! DId our founding fathers really want it changed? And if so, what changes would they have approved? If changes to the document were their intent, perhaps gun restrictions would be something they would have favored? Of course, that's up for opinion and interpretation. Similar to the current debate. Up to opinion and interpretation. It's easy for either side to interpret the document that best favors their views. What are your thoughts? Be nice!
No it's not hunting. It was for an armed militia to check slaves for ammo and arms. To keep the slaves from uprising mostly in the south.. Again, it's open to interpretation.
by My Esoteric5 months ago
Sorry about the paraphrase, but was space limited (hubpages should take note). What James Madison actually wrote was: "In framing a system which we wish to last for ages, we should not lose sight of the...
by Mustafa Khursheed2 years ago
Your first statement should probably be a definition of Islam: is it what the terrorists, using religion for an excuse for jihad, worship or is it what the more peaceful people worship. Or somewhere in between?
by Johnathan L Groom6 years ago
I am only filling in this box because I am required to. I think that people are closer, while a person's conclusive actions best display his/her spirituality by way of an action itself, per say, such as chasing a...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.