With the Republican leadership choosing to follow in the footsteps of former majority leader Harry Reid, and change the Senate rules (known as the nuclear option) its assured that Judge Gorsuch will be confirmed tomorrow and tilt the court to the right. President Trump has the potential to nominate and get one, two, or even three more conservative justices on the court before his term is up, and unless the Democrats can somehow gain a few Senate seats in 2018, this seems almost a certainty. There are many people who feel this will serve as a balance for the stacked lower courts, which lean heavily Democrat. Others see this as righting the ship and brining the nation back to the rule of Constitutional law. I'd like to get the opinions of the HP audience.
I believe some of your sources of information are incorrect. Senate filibustering began in1837, long before Harry Reid was even born. What the GOP Senate just did is historic and another step toward a one-party political system.
The number of lower-court judges is based on eight years of a Bush presidency and eight years of an Obama presidency. The number of judges on the bench who were appointed by Democrats merely drew even with Republicans near the end of Obama's term. So it's hard to show how they are stacked in favor of Democrats.
Republicans may cheer today, but they will be horrified if they lose control of Congress (if ever). The shoe will be on the other foot.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol … e/3286337/
I think his point was that Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option (3 years ago, I think) and the Republicans are simply following suit.
I am sending a virtual hug to Harry Reid, because he isn't done kicking himself yet.
It is sad that we have reached the point where we must resort to something like the nuclear option to get a Judge as qualified as Neil Gorsuch appointed to the Supreme Court. It is not like he is not qualified to do the job.
I would think that every American would be thrilled that someone with his qualifications would be willing to take the job. But, party lines continue to rule and this will most likely continue until this great country self destructs because of our Politicians.
I agree. That said, isn't it the voters and donors who force politicians to act that way?
Democrats Pulled the same thing in the lower federal court nominations ! Wasn't a bad thing then Huh?..................They can suffer now .
Not sure how that would be promisem. Once elected they pretty much do whatever they please.
I watched the entire interviewing process for Neil Gorsuch, 11 hours...honorable, intelligent man....There was nothing to do with
donors and voters, the few politicians (3) senate members holding up the process...looked for any thing they could make a problem on. There wasn't any........Politicians chose to act that wway
Unfortunately too many people have forgotten that we're a single nation and we need to act in ways that benefit everyone, not just one Party or the other
How do we once again divorce the recently political correctivelly, I know that's not a word, fixed ideologies to a position of compromising once again , OR were they ever compromising ? That may be the question we all need to answer in order to "drain the swamp ", the opposite polarities of two party systematic destructiveness is at an all time high -----thus feeding the congressional hyper apathy in America right now.
Is the Democrat opposition to Neil Gorsuch any different than the Republican opposition to Merrick Garland?
No, and it has nothing to do with the qualifications or abilities of either one. This is all about Politics and the hell with what is good for our country.
It would not surprise me to see Merrick Garland nominated again if there is another vacancy to fill.
by Ralph Schwartz 17 months ago
What's your thoughts on the Republicans using Harry Reid's nuclear option?Mitch McConnell used the Nuclear Option today, virtually assuring Neil Gorsuch to be confirmed to the Supreme Court tomorrow. Is this another example of how the Democrats are seeing their past tactics working against...
by My Esoteric 17 months ago
My thought is No, they should go ahead and filibuster Judge Gorsuch now and not wait. The fear of filibustering now is that the Rs might use the "Nuclear Option" - using a simple majority to change Senate rules to eliminate filibustering for Supreme Court nominees; just as Democrats...
by crankalicious 17 months ago
It looks like Democrats are going to filibuster SCOTUS nominee Neil Gorsuch and force Mitch McConnell to change the Senate rules so that a simple majority can confirm SCOTUS justices now and in the future.While I don't agree with judge Gorsuch on a lot of issues nor do I care for his opinions and I...
by Nick Rosenbaum 17 months ago
Are Senate Democrats wasting the filibuster option on Neil Gorsuch?President Trump's next SCOTUS pick (if he receives the opportunity) will tip the ideological balance of the court for 30+ years. Are Senate Democrats squandering the opportunity to put up a fight against Trumps next pick, who...
by Steven Escareno 7 years ago
From going through religious and political forums, I noticed some hubbers feel that democrats are pro atheists while republicans are pro religion. Although, I've met plenty of atheists that were republicans, and I've known quite a few religious democrats during my time. Therefore, I'm a...
by LucidDreams 5 years ago
I am not saying ALL Republicans are, I am just wondering why anyone would actually stay with a party that is clearly not on the same page as most of America? Most (not all) but most who are die hard right Republicans watch Fox news. Not sure if you have noticed, they can't even get along with each...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|