1. The commander in chief not knowing there is a specific protocol for sharing classified information, even with allies, to ensure all the relevant implications are fully considered?
2. The commander in chief knowing that there is such a protocol, and ignoring it to share information with Russia, even after 17 of his own intelligence agencies agreed the Russian government conspired to interfere with the presidential election?
You tell me.
Fighting terrorism together. It's a b**ch but someone's got to step up to the plate and do it.
I think what irritates me the most is the constant negativity. Without bothering to give the guy a chance. We went through the same thing with Obama during his first years. I suppose the fact that Obama failed miserably makes them assume Trump will also.
Sure, and when the US, Russia, China and N. Korea are all singing songs round a campfire, I'll be the first to celebrate.
Until then, operational security is important. Potentially putting intelligence sources at risk by sharing classified information without consulting with the people who gathered that intelligence, is idiotic, egotistical and dangerous.
I thought that with the Clinton fiasco we had decided, as a country, that classified information was to be treated no different than any other information?
Those who still compare President Obama and Trump scare the bejeezes out of me. It was one thing to excuse the fact that you put this guy in office, but to continue to defend him is beyond excuse.
Obama was a gentleman, I'll give him that. Trump isn't . That's a fact. But Obama was a Commander in Chief and so is Trump now. Those who refuse to give him half a chance scare the bejeezes out of me. Such negativity I haven't seen since Obama took office. It was as distasteful then as it is now.
It is the unbreakable "Group Think " of the left that will never allow them to even ever recognize true progress , was AHC act working ? No , Is Trump trying to change it , yes , Funny , no one that was in this meeting between Russia and Trump say anything was disclosed but The Washington Post has "inside sources "..............Yea , right .
The Democrats ,the Hilary sore losers , the DNC , the biased media, the old republican establishment all want Trump to fail , ...........Watch him kick butt and take names !
I don't foresee him kicking butt and taking names but I am willing to give him a chance.
He's fighting quite a battle alone , The right , the left , the media bias , Its a wonder he's progressing forward at all . i was listening to Brietbart Radio - David Webb today and they were discussing how many countries are closely watching America's present political reality , THEY see Trump's war for what it is , An "outsider " fighting the rolling tides of deciet , ingrained corruption , bias and hatred .
You are very quick to doubt the motives and credibility of everyone else in the world - why, then, do you place your trust unquestioningly in Breitbart? Don't they deserve the same approach as everyone else? What convinced you that they are genuine and no one else is?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 … gel-farage
Because , unlike many ,many people here , although especially those of politically selfish younger generations , I know what media integrity is , I know what the recognition of honesty is , i fully appreciate media accuracy . All of this Once the pride of the american mainstream news media .
Sad part is , It wasn't that long ago !
But, you have to admit that your preferred news source leans heavily right.
Of course ,Fox for one is right they are however playing the Establishment Right's game against Trump though , tell me something which of the other TV news sources are even center -right ?
CNN.............Left -Left Center ?
MSNBC........Way way left
Democracy Now .....otu in space Left
Right now they are all playing the anti Trump for the establishment Congress and Senate
So where is the balance ? - and I also hear both - American voters are Center left and Center neutral ...?
So what makes you think Breitbart is the exception? Can you explain please? References?
Brietbart Radio , is but one of my media sources on sirius radio , a station of two or three hour programs by various people with varying backgrounds of news stations --widely separated from the mainstream media -- who break down current and past political activity using fact , political and media records. Yes , like all media , they have an agenda . Brietbart actually holds all politicians "feet to the fire " right or left and I definitely like that .
Rather than listening to one flavor pf media opines , one agenda , I vote for the variety of broadcasters and opinions . That's why I am such a well rounded opinionist ..........:-]
by Yves 21 months ago
Obama's Presidency is nearing it's end. What is his legacy, in your view?All opinions are welcome. I am interested to hear how different people view Barak Obama, as Commander-In-Chief.
by Ralph Deeds 8 years ago
Should President Obama have fired General McChrystal? Should we revise our approach in Afghanistan? How much longer can we allow this seemingly endless war go on? Is their a bright side to what we are doing?
by mio cid 2 years ago
Who do you think is more qualified to be commander in chief,Hillary or The Donald?Of all the responsibilities this may be the most important to be expected of a president.What qualifies each candidate to be commander in chief?
by Dan Harmon 4 weeks ago
https://nypost.com/2018/10/15/why-trump … dent-ever/A long list of promises Trump made during his campaign. Promises he's kept and that never were lies, unlike promises our politicians are so fond of but either know they cannot accomplish or have no intention of even trying. As a...
by PhoenixV 2 years ago
Who Would Be The Best Commander In Chief, Hillary or Trump?
by Jack Lee 9 months ago
This is a shocking relvelation, if true, undermines our whole democratic process...Why is this not headline news?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|