jump to last post 1-1 of 1 discussions (4 posts)

Shouldn't , couldn't members of the DNC still be indicted ?

  1. ahorseback profile image78
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    Debbie Wasserman Shultz  for one ,   her replacement ?   What do democrats feel about the  Super -delegates at this point    ?

    1. wilderness profile image99
      wildernessposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      What laws were violated?  Legal, of course, not moral - we all understand they rigged the election.

      1. ahorseback profile image78
        ahorsebackposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        Man ! There just has to be some broken laws there , all the leaks , the corruption , the rigging !

    2. colorfulone profile image87
      colorfuloneposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      MSM isn't talking about the DCN's and Schultz's arguments in court.  What a circus.  Bernie supporters are finding out the disdain the DNC has for them.  They think they have the right to pick what ever candidate they want and to hell with the voters.  The primary doesn't have to be fair, etc.  Even though their own rules said otherwise.  Geeze!

      Schultz has been under a criminal investigation and could be indicted for corruption.  She has many ties to others who are under investigations including "Hillary Clinton and the Awan brothers saga".   

      The best investigation source I have found is George Webb's detailed reporting as he connects the dots.  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrQ-wH … jQGcuoYnew

      He has lots of videos with interesting info, mind blowing really, but the drip, drip, drip of it gets boring.  Its sickening to realize all the ties and corruption Clinton has been into.