Most are probably aware of the details of Pres. Reagan's Iran/Contra scandal, and that there are two opposing camps of opinions. One, that Col. North was a treasonous criminal, and the other that he was a true patriot.
As is typical for me, I choose a middle path. I think he was a true patriot at heart, that committed criminal, (but probably not treasonous), acts in the zeal of his patriotism.
I also think that he was not a candidate for a Presidential pardon. Even with his patriotic motives, I think he knew he was breaking the law, and, purposely acted to circumvent both Congressional will and laws specific to his actions.
What say you?
Haven't most pardon receivers guilty of knowingly breaking the law and purposely acting to circumvent it? I mean, I could see a conviction of involuntary manslaughter being pardoned, but suspect the large majority intended to break the law - their actions were no accident.
Well gee whiz Wilderness, of course most pardons are for purposeful lawbreakers. My purpose in that explanation was to rebut the perspective that his actions were only that of a patriot.
I will try to be more clear in the future. ;-)
by Alternative Prime14 months ago
Even the last few remaining "Trumpeteers" GASPED when they heard this BOMBSHELL ~ Still think they'll give this Delusionally Reckless individual OUR Nuclear CODE?? Wow ~ Just when you thought Anti-AMERICAN...
by Kathleen Cochran12 months ago
How much taxpayer money is going to be wasted by House oversight committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and his fellow members this time? The Benghazi boondoggle wasn't enough? And they wonder why the...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.