Is it ever right for Governments to restrict freedom of speech?
Absolutely. The government has a right to issue permits restricting where and when groups can organize as long as they don't discriminate based on the content or beliefs of the organization. In other words, they can restrict speech on the basis of time and space available.
Also, you don't have free speech in high-traffic buildings (such as inside classrooms/buildings, even in a public school). You can cause a fire hazard if you're blocking an entrance, and, if people are required to be in that building (say, if they're going to class), they're considered a captive audience, and they shouldn't have to listen to someone making a statement.
Your freedom of speech ends where my freedoms begin. The government can restrict speech if it imposes on someone else's basic human rights. That's a bit of a grey area, but sometimes protecting people from personal attacks is more important than protecting the right to make them. Not always though, because sometimes the restrictions go too far, and we don't say anything for fear of "insulting" another person or group.
Yes, there are periods of time when government should have a right to limit freedom of speech.
In times of war for instance, if notice of an operation gets leaked lives are at stake. Then limits should be imposed.
Restrictions need to be loose in times of lesser national danger but if public knowledge would endanger the nation then the nation should be supreme. Of course that opens a whole can of worms as to who decides what is in the national interest, So far that is not resolved satisfactirily.
by Amanda Littlejohn 5 years ago
Which is more important, freedom of faith or freedom of speech?Many religious folks are decent, good people. Some of my best friends subscribe to institutionalised superstition - and are good humored enough to let me say that without taking offense. But most religions per se enshrine some deeply...
by LoliHey 3 years ago
Doesn't freedom of speech mean that there are no consequences?Lately we hear about people losing their jobs for stuff they tweet and post. People say, "Well, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences." I beg to differ, though. You're supposed to be able...
by irachx 19 months ago
Do we really have freedom of speech?
by Tessa Schlesinger 4 years ago
Why are Christians permitted by law to prosyletize on the streets? Shouldn't it be made illegal?Religious organizations do not pay taxes so they should not be permitted the use of the streets for their 'work.' In addition, as much as there is freedom of speech, there is also the freedom to not hear...
by Lions Den Media 8 years ago
Obama has used the Espionage Act, passed under Woodrow Wilson to shut down media opposition WWI, 6 times in 3 years, whilst it had been used 3 times since 1917, to target or shut down journalists that Obama targeted. In Syria journalists were killed and Obama praised their tough journalistic style,...
by Diana Grant 6 years ago
Should extremists be gagged, or should freedom of speech be allowed?When an English soldier was murdered in the streets of Woolwich, London, on 22nd May 2013, video film on various news stations, including but not limited to the BBC, showed substantial footage of Michael Adeboloja (who grew...
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|