I am not so sure there is a distinction because in either case the actual bomb is simply an instrument which is employed by someone else in a far away place. The fact that a human being has been convinced to be the "mule" to deliver it rather than a rocket or airplane is the only real difference other than the explosive power of the bomb itself. In either case, the driving factors are probably the same but the options for delivery, especially in the case of gypsy terrorists, may be more limitied. WB
by Fritz Isaacs4 years ago
Can cockroaches survive a nuclear bomb?
by lesliebyars4 years ago
If North Korea is a real issue what should be done about it?
by Deforest2 years ago
Don't we have decency? By letting those warmongers dropping a nuclear bomb on Yemen we are allowing them to use them in any conflicts... Doesn't it bother you? After Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Yemen who's next?...
by Jack Lee5 weeks ago
This case should be clear cut. Either the DOJ and the FBI are following procedures or they are not?Either the FISA court is doing its job or it is not?We need to get to the bottom of this and it should be bipartisan....
by Demas W Jasper2 years ago
What is your opinion of "The Iran Deal"?To my view "The Iran Deal" is nothing short of "Kicking the can down the road, with an uphill road facing Israel and the USA" when the...
by deecoleworld3 years ago
Why is evil seen as unnatural/ inhuman?Why is evil seen as unnatural/inhuman? Can it be seen as natural?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.