If North Korea is a real issue what should be done about it?
Nothing. Period. Let them work out their own problems. If the people of North Korea ever get a belly full of Un, they will make their own move just as Syria is seeing their own way out of the dictator that has ruined their lives.
As far as being in harms way with the nuclear missile threats, you can believe that our highest of alerts are on the job and ready to shoot down anything being lobbed our way. We don't have a clue as to our military capabilities and we are not about to serve them up for all to see.
North Korea is not a threat to the USA at all. The danger is China which is using North Korea to keep pressure on the USA.
I agree with most of the comments, however, if North Korea ever did let loose a missile at us, the danger is mostly in our own government's reaction. Then we might stir up China. Practically every thing we buy is made in China Could China afford to lose the US as a market? I don't know.
North Korea is a regional and global threat because of the instability of its leader and his willingness, as we have seen in recent days, to use the most brutal of force to coerce even his allies to toe-the-line.
In addition, North Korea has an ambitious and increasingly successful missile program; a weapons program more than capable---presently, of an attack on South Korea.
North Korea is about as threatening as the snotty kid next door who claims that his dad can beat up your dad. Just because he occasionally waves a slingshot around doesn't mean he'll ever use it.
Anytime you have a dictator in charge of a country with grandiose delusions, it's dangerous.
Anybody who has a nuclear bomb is dangerous. Anybody who has a nuclear bomb and is quite possibly insane is even more dangerous. Anybody who has a nuclear bomb, is quite possibly insane, and threatens to use it is exceedingly dangerous.
And Education, you know what you are talking about. After all, aren't we the only ones who used the nuclear weapon on civilians? Aren't we the only ones who dropped a nuclear head on North Carolina in 1961? If we are not dangerous, what are we to the eyes of the international community?
The danger comes from us! We install nuclear heads aiming at China, Iran, North Korea... and we are doing business with them. We used Saddam, Ben Ali... and when we don't need them we overthrow them by financing the opposition. Japan is on the verge of surrendering during ww2 and we bomb them to experiment the consequences of the nuclear bomb on civilians. We sacrifice our youth, we "eugenized" the poor, we imploded the world trade center, we are poisoning our land (fracking) ...
Why don't we look ourselves in the mirror before pointing a finger to a created enemy?
If the rest of your statements are as accurate as your "Japan was about to surrender..." statement, then perhaps your opinion could benefit from a little research.
Japan was far from surrendering - they were training a new corp of Kamikaze pilots in preparation for an invasion landing. Check it out...
I have never heard that Japan was ready to surrender, and I would be very interested in seeing a source that suggested otherwise.
Japan was far from surrender.
A basic---and I mean BASIC, understanding of Japanese history and culture---particularly the culture the emerged from the Meiji Restoration and persisted into World War II, would help one to understand how utterly impossible surrender was for Japan.
I checked it out so ,please, don't come and count me your idealized version of our history! You will also tell me that Pearl Harbor, the Tonkin... had nothing to do with our involvement?
OK, you stick with your version of history and I will stick with mine.
By end of July 1945 Japanese leaders were seeking conditional surrender terms via "back-channel" contacts with the Soviet Union - but they wanted favorable terms that would allow them to rebuild their military.
Conditional surrender was acceptable to none of the allied nations - Do you think the world should have accepted a conditional surrender that allowed them to rebuild their military?
The reply to their entreaty was a demand for unconditional surrender, as in no more military capability, - they refused. They received the unconditional surrender offer before the bombs were dropped.
The bombs were dropped in August 1945 - so there was almost two weeks for the Japanese to accept surrender. They did not.
Japan attacked China and Malaysia, and was aligned with Hitler well before they attacked the U.S. - so do you still think we provoked/deserved Pearl Harbor?
ps. you could have found this and much more detailed chronologies with one of those famous "20 minute Google searches" - if accuracy were important to your opinions.
pss. The Soviet Union continued fighting and conquering Japanese held territory for almost two weeks after the surrender. But not the U.S. hmmm...
Ideals and philosophies are powerful things when grounded in facts and realities.
Thank you for attempting to offer some voice of reason in response to this uninformed and clearly agenda-driven and anti-American drivel.
And yes, we will stick with the facts of history as they are, but also need to understand that the result of sticking to the facts with some people is analogous to banging one's head on a very hard wall.
by Don W 16 months ago
I'm struggling to keep up with all this. Is Trump really planning to attack North Korea if they do another nuclear test? Is it seriously being considered as a possibility? Or is it just sabre rattling? And is this type of brinksmanship the best approach to foreign policy?
by Jack Lee 16 months ago
It is a delemma for me. As a conservative and one who does not like wars unless absolutely necessary, I am just not sure what we can do in this case.You have a dictator who is treated as a god by his own people, almost like a cult.They have been brainwashed to hate us and the west.They also possess...
by Mike Russo 14 months ago
What did America do to make North Korea hate us?
by TMMason 8 years ago
I heard this yesterday and today.http://www.kansascity.com/2010/07/23/21 … ponse.htmlDoes N.Korea really understand what will happen to them if they Nuke our Navy?And what do you think should be our response to a Military strike against our navy by N.Korea?
by Scott S Bateman 11 months ago
Do you want nuclear war with North Korea and China?It's easy to think we can beat North Korea in a conventional war because of our advanced military. But such a war brings big problems:1. North Korea has a few small nukes, but China has thousands of them. China has made clear since the 1950s war...
by Person of Interest 5 years ago
I'm beginning to think that moron might actually do something.http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/new … 561503.eceWhat a pain in the...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|