Do sanctions actually help or hurt the people in a country?
sanctions are being implemented against lybia, will it help or just hurt the general population?
Sanctions are not useful because of the implicit assumptions attached to them.Sanctions are useful only when viewed within the context of economics, but economics that takes into account a variety of different organizing principles. Not every country uses a free market capitalist system. For instance, if a small country faced sanctions but was an autarchy, meaning it produced all of its goods, then the sanctions would be useless. Further, it assumes that the country would be unable to find other partners to make up for the trade deficit resulting from sanctions. Finally, the last assumption that proves incorrect is that all countries will act in unison. Frequently international players have divided loyalties, and thus will not always act together for the purpose of sanctions.
Yes, because sanctions work, and are effective in many different ways.Sanctions normally only work to pressure smaller countries into abiding by the laws of the governing NATO nations. A majority of smaller countries rely on bigger countries to supply them with most of their goods, such as foods, building materials and raw goods. Most of the time, these smaller nation will have to give in to the larger nation in order to meet the demand to sustain their government
What gives any country the right to sanction another is debatable. But in reality the sanctions do not work they only hurt the general populous like those in Iraq before the war. It breeds resentment towards the country that instigated the sanctions. Given the history and inclinations of the countries in the world that have the power to sanction other countries,I would say it is a play ground bully mentality - you either do what I tell you or you'll get it where it hurts - like USA with Iran over the so called nuclear energy issue.
It will hurt people. The crime will rise, smuggling of all kind will became main occupation. Prices will rise, poor will be destitute, and those who was rich will be richer. Sanctions are bad for people, and the county.
When the US or UN imposes sanctions, the value of those goods and services go through the roof. Guess who is still there selling those goods and services,the same companies and institutions that were there before, but making a higher profit using shell companies as "middle men" to cover their tracks. In the cases where this does not happen, there are plenty of other countries that do not follow the sanctions and the UN probably does this to shift the balance of power or money flow.
When the US does not sell to a country, then China or Russia steps in. Either way, those countries receive what they need with the exception of the guy on the street. Due to the high cost of those goods, only the wealthy and connected have access to them.
The UN is like a great big carnivore cat - a fat house cat that eats from a can, not the lion of the jungle that it should be.
It works both ways...India Pak both were sanctioned in 1998. India is now developing fast..Pakistan failed..
by Mike Russo 18 months ago
What did America do to make North Korea hate us?
by Chuck Nugent 6 years ago
Is outsourcing of production good or bad for an economy?Outsourcing has become a topic in the current Presidential campaign. In answering this question please explain how it helps or harms an economy.
by ThunderKeys 7 years ago
Is there anyone reading who can explain the global economic crisis simply and objectively in just a few paragraphs? When I try to find information to understand what's going on with the Euro and with the US economy, there is so much biased nonsense. Everything from unhelpful off-topic political...
by JAKE Earthshine 2 hours ago
Weird, Strange and Suspicious as usual from this dangerously chaotic white house in perpetual crisis: WHY on Earth is republican Steve Mnuchin relaxing sanctions on Russia after what they've done and while they are STILL infiltrating our private property in an aggressive manner ?? What’s his...
by James Kenny 4 years ago
Apparently, Russia has demanded the surrender of Ukrainian forces in the Crimea by 03:00 GMT. If they don't comply, then there will be an all out assault. Will this conflict escalate into something bigger?http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26424738
by Scott Belford 7 months ago
It is the same because Trump's AG Sessions used SAME verses from the Bible to justify taking children away from Families at the border that fellow conservatives used to Justify Slaveryhttps://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 … tions.html
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|