Why Would Are President make a deal like this for Iran?
What I don't understand and I'm sue most if not all American citizens are not getting is why Iran!, what sense does it make to give them like. Billion dollars to build nukes when they don't like America along with Irans Allies, Russia, North Korea, and maybe China and who ever else wants in.. Why as a country do we the people allow the fate of our children's and our lives at there disposal? Makes you wonder the true motive of are president put us all at risk!!!!!.
I personally believe it's an occultic agenda. The president is a puppet.
Maybe you should ask this about North Korea. They're making nuclear-armed missiles that will be able to hit the U.S.
The treaty with Iran has nothing to do with the U.S. giving Iran billions of dollars. Most of the money is due to come from other countries that owe Iran money for oil they already bought. That money will go to Iran whether Congress approves the Iran treaty or not.
Maybe you should also ask why 5 other major powers signed on to the treaty. There must be some substance in the treaty that you do no understand.
What do you think?
Hello, Jason. Good question. However I'm not sure about the part about 'giving' them billions of dollars. My understanding is that the financial aspect is more a matter of unfreezing previously frozen Iranian assets.
In answering your question, there's no way to sugar-coat this: Obama is an Islamic sympathizer, who truly hates his country, and who is trying to do as much damage as he can get way with, while he is still in the driver's seat. Most of the crazy sh*t that O"Bummer has pulled only makes sense, from the perspective of his personal agenda. Moreover he does not give a rat's patootie about the possibility of his Iran Giveaway increasing the probability of a future WW3.
Most people have not read the deal.
They're either responding because they like or dislike the president or they are basing it on snippets of what the media has fed them.
The deal is not between the U.S. and Iran
It encompasses a coalition of nations; Russia, China, Germany, France, and the U.K. are all a part of it. In fact this was probably the last opportunity to reach any kind of deal before the other countries lifted their sanctions.
Going to war is always an option.
However (if) Iran honors the deal then history will record it as being a landmark peace agreement. All treaties and or agreements run the risk of one party not living up to it but that doesn't mean counties should avoid the opportunities where it makes sense to give peace a chance.
It made little sense for the U.S. to be a "lone wolf" holding sanctions while the rest of the free world lifted theirs. At the very least we got a buy in from those countries to go to war in the event Iran breaks the treaty.
Right now it's too early to know whether this deal was good or bad.
It's been reported in the past that Iran was only one or two years away from developing a nuclear bomb. (With the sanctions in place). If years go by without that taking place to some extent the treaty will have succeeded.
No one "knows" what the future holds!
by Scott Belford 13 months ago
Since every authority, save a very biased Netanyahu, says Iran was complying with the terms of the Nuclear Pact, Trump's reinstating sanctions is a clear violation. Do you think:1. Iran will go it alone and start up their nuclear weaponization program again?2. Iran will continue working with...
by ga anderson 4 years ago
Probably a tough discussion to have, since the exact details can't be confirmed, but here are a few "understood" parts.1. "The deal" would have a limited life. Current gossip has it as a 10-year deal.2. The general consensus of the political insider gossip is that Iran will get...
by Person of Interest 7 years ago
If there ever was a way to make an aircraft carrier turn around, this is it."Iran warns U.S. aircraft carrier not to return"http://news.yahoo.com/iran-threatens-ac … 24042.html
by Mike Russo 23 months ago
What did America do to make North Korea hate us?
by Bieberella 8 years ago
Should the U.S. fork over hundreds of billions of dollars to poor countries so they can go green?Secretary of State announced Thursday at the Copenhagen Climate Summit that U.S. would give this money to help low-income people cope with climate change.
by mhope324 7 years ago
Many news outlets, like CNN, have posted that Leon Panetta is now suggesting Isreal will attack Iran in the spring. Is this a good idea? Should America get involved?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|