Should the USA consider privatizing the Postal Service? What are the pros and cons?
No, all utilities should remain under the control of the government. We are having that nonsense over here in the UK now, wanting to sell off the Royal Mail, as if the government hasn't learned the lesson of selling off the gas, electric. and water utilities to foreign investors. We now have those services controlled by foreigners and we are paying them the profits that should go to the government; and are getting poor service.
I believe that it should stay public. There are already many private companies that provide similar services, such as UPS and Fedex, so making the US Postal Service private would be useless. Look into those companies that are private and that's pretty much how the US Postal Service would be. However, another con to it though would be that the prices would almost certainly be raised on all the services being provided.
The US Post Office was explicitly authorized by the United States Constitution, one of only a few such agencies. It has, since it's inception, been considered of paramount importance for a free people. In 1983 the Post Office was transformed into the Postal Service, a corporate style entity, with a board of governors acting as a corporate board. The Postmaster is no longer a cabinet position, but instead acts as the CEO of a corporation.
The USPS receives little taxpayer money, primarily for costs associated with overseas voters. Yet it provides reduced rates for library materials, books, and matter mailed by non-profit organizations, as directed by Congress.
It employs approximately 600,000 people and has nearly a quarter million vehicles. It costs the Postal Service about $8 million additional for each 1 cent rise in the cost of fuel. As you can imagine, their labor and fuel costs are off the charts.
The internet has radically reduced the volume of mail, but has not removed a single stop from any postal route. It takes the same amount of time and fuel to deliver one piece to every address as it does to deliver three. The reduced mail volume no longer covers the cost of 6-day delivery to every address in the country.
What sane businessman would want to buy it? Would you buy a USPS IPO?
I've heard many stories about lazy postal carriers, but with over a half million workers, there are sure to be a few undeserving of the public trust. How many large companies have as few complaints? Delivering over 660,000,000 pieces of mail to over 142,000,000 addresses daily is an incredible feat.
No, I don't think America should consider privatization. It really could not serve any useful purpose.
No because we already have two large private organizations that are similar to the Post Office: FedEx and UPS
by ptosis 2 years ago
Remember Reagan firing all those ATC's when they were on strike? Please discuss if this is a good thing or a bad thing.Should air traffic controllers be privatized? - Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom have private ATC. Delta Air Lines, says separating air traffic control...
by Stacie L 7 years ago
By Emily StephensonThe U.S. Postal Service announced plans on Thursday to close or consolidate 223 mail processing centers and eliminate up to 35,000 jobs as part of its strategy to cut costs by reducing its network of facilities. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46501840/ns … 0a963m2auI I am...
by Stacie L 8 years ago
Obama's Postal Service plan would cut Saturday mailWASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration's plan to rescue the U.S. Postal Service would allow the agency to end Saturday mail delivery and sell non-postal products, according to documents released on Monday.The plan, introduced alongside a...
by John Coviello 6 years ago
Are you in favor of ending U.S. Postal Service delivery on Saturdays?The U.S. Postal Service is ending delivery on Saturdays starting in August 2013. Are you in favor of this policy change? This is obviously a prudent money saving move by the Postal Service (which is losing money),...
by Dennis L. Page 6 years ago
The Republicans want to introduce a bill to stop home delivery of mail. Instead they propose the United States Postal Service set up "mail hubs" or in other words, designated areas with clusters of mail boxes for pickup. Apparently in the zest to streamline the postal service there seems...
by Doug Hughes 8 years ago
From Paul Krugman yesterday"More when we have some details. But two key points: 1. Privatizing and voucherizing Medicare does nothing whatsoever to control costs. We’ve seen that from the sorry history of Medicare Advantage. I’m sure that the Republicans will claim savings — but those savings...
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|