Should the government force postal workers back to work?
the bill was passed, do you agree that the government has the right to force certain workers back to work?
Anarchism is not a solution for any democratic country. Government has a big role to play in managing the country properly then in such a situation it is forced to put on some pressure. Mass protest is o.k but not at the cost of country's development. Disrupting a nation wide communication work is really uncalled for. It is not a struggle for freedom from any outer body. Postal workers and government both are parts of a same body so means of protest should be chalked out without hindering national stability. Government is answerable to all and not only to the postal workers but it is also answerable to the postal workers so it has to work for their betterment too. Forcing back to work for national interest is fine but using force as a dictator in a democratic country is ridiculous.
No, they should be fired and replaced. The government has no authority to force someone to work, and the employee has no right to keep their job if they go out on strike or choose not to work for any other reason. I understand that the government does not want certain services to stop (the mail, trains etc.) but I don't think this justifies force. A possibility might be that a bond would be issued when the employee is hired which allows for the government to be compensated for the loss of the employee when they go rogue, this money can then be used to train a replacement. Or that the employees pension is only theirs on the condition that they do not strike or refuse to work for any reason. I think this would be better than allowing the government to use force, they already use to much of it in every other spheres of action, lets not give them any more excuses.
by Stacie L 6 years ago
By Emily StephensonThe U.S. Postal Service announced plans on Thursday to close or consolidate 223 mail processing centers and eliminate up to 35,000 jobs as part of its strategy to cut costs by reducing its network of facilities. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46501840/ns … 0a963m2auI I am...
by KK Trainor 7 years ago
If you could create a new country what type of government would you form?Would you have a Bill of Rights, or would you do something more like a pure monarchy? Give me details please.
by My Esoteric 23 months ago
In both the Federalist Papers AND the Constitutional Convention, it is extremely clear the distaste most of those involved in creating today's America had for democracy, which they saw as mob rule which allows "emotion" rather than "reason" to drive important decisions.Friday's...
by Wayne Brown 7 years ago
Should the USA consider privatizing the Postal Service? What are the pros and cons?
by Greensleeves Hubs 5 years ago
I ask this question because I feel a sense of dilemma. I hate extremism in general and religious extremism in particular. I am not sure exactly what the policies of the Muslim Brotherhood government are, but the idea of any government associated so directly with religion worries me greatly -...
by pisean282311 8 years ago
for me it is hollow talks , corruption and dividing people..
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|