Is the President's contraceptive mandate a precursor to cutting government aid to religious groups?
In the first week of February 2012, American President Barack Obama signed a government mandate that forced religious institutions that offer insurance to employees to include contraceptives in the insurance plan. The president's decision caused a major stir from the Catholic church, GOP political opponents, and members of his own Democratic party. I wonder if the President Obama floated a fight he knew he could not win in order to justify something else; that is, a move to cut all federal aid from religious institutions such as religious-backed colleges and universities?
I don't know, but I think the government aiding religious groups of any kind is in essence picking one religion over the other, and should not be done in the U.S. Religious groups should raise their own money for their own purposes.
Regarding the contraceptives issue. I understand people's strong convictions against abortion, but being raised Catholic I never understood the opposition to contraceptives use within the Catholic Church doctrine, which 90% of Catholics do not adhere to according to polls I've seen. It is really out of step with reality, and just seems extreme and silly to me. It's actually one of the reasons I drifted away from the Catholic Church. That and their silly ban on Priest marrying, which is totally counterproductive, and makes no sense in a religious context or otherwise.
If 90% of Catholics don't follow the church's teachings and policies regarding contraceptives use, then why should the church force its views on its employees, many of whom are not even Catholic? Besies, contraceptives use leads to far less abortions, so being against contraceptives use is in odds with another goal of the Catholic faith.
The mandate only says that religious groups cannot exclude birth control from their insurance coverage. It doesn't force anyone to use contraceptives. It is still a personal choice.
Still, the government is stepping in to dictate to the church what doctines and policies it can and cannot follow. This type of infringement on the church has rarely been seen in the history of the USA. One would have to think that Obama knew he would run into massive opposition on this policy change. Is he looking for a bigger fish to fry?
I hope so. The government has no business in supporting any religious group. Remember "separation of church and state"?
Rather than trying to come up with something just to sound smart. I'm just going to be truthful here. It's just too good to be true. This thing is so politically stupid that makes me suspicious. Unless there is some evil genius that I can't see behind this, it looks to me lik he's working very hard to give this election to us.
I think if you're paying attention to his actions today you got the answer to your last question.
by Joel 6 years ago
Obama just made a statement about changing his mandate that religious organizations must provide insurance coverage for contraceptives. This has caused an uprising becuase it infringes upon religious freedoms. The Catholic Church has been making a big deal about it. Now, the...
by Amy DeMarco 6 years ago
I take birth control pills for medical reasons. I have PCOS. Without it, my hormones would be imbalanced and I'd be at risk for uterine cancer. There are many women like me. I find it disturbing that those who oppose covering birth control don't know this and equally appalled that those...
by Liberty66 6 years ago
The controversey over the Obama mandate, that the Catholic church should provide contraception and sterilization to their employees in the insurance policy. is a bogus argument. The Church has 2000 years of teaching and doctrine that says the prevention of life ,or the taking of a life after...
by John Wilson 3 years ago
With the "liberal" movement in the U.S., should Christians feel persecuted or oppressed?Many of the decisions coming from the Supreme Court seem contrary to Christian beliefs.Many of the laws being passed in Washington, D.C. seem to be an affront specifically to Christians.If you're a...
by Sooner28 6 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/21/us/re … odayspaperWhy is this still allowed? If the Catholic Church ever had a doctrine that said African Americans, Asian Americans, or Hispanic Americans could not be priests, they would've been banned from discriminating.However, the United States...
by Damanee 4 years ago
Why is sexual intercourse not fun anymore?Risky sexual behavior can have many negative consequences both in adolescence, as previous research has shown and, as this study reports, in later life. Poor contraceptive use and a poor choice of sexual partner can all severely impact mental health...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|