In my opinion, power politics. That's not to say that there aren't important matters involved, too.
Environmentalists--of whom I suppose I am one--don't want Keystone because we feel that making a big investment in a very dirty energy source is not the right way to go. Feelings about that are very strong indeed--you may remember that there were environmentalists picketing in front of the White House; NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen, who is one of the leading authorities on climate change, was arrested in one of the protests.
Environmentalists, you may have noticed, are more aligned with the President than with the Republicans. (I think it's fair to say that environmentalists are not very welcome any more in many GOP circles--especially the 'Tea-partyish' ones.)
On the other hand, many unionists are largely in favor of Keystone because construction could create a lot of jobs for their membership.
Unionists, you may have noticed, are also more aligned with the President than with Republicans. (In fact, I think it's fair to say that most GOP members never met a union they liked--see Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin for exhibit "A.")
Keystone, therefore, put the President in the uncomfortable position of having to alienate one or another of two important groups of supporters--in an election year, no less. When he deferred the decision, he dodged that particular bullet.
The Republican attempts to deflect that bullet back at him (so to speak) are ingenious. (To be fair, most of them ideologically favor Keystone anyway, so if they can force it through, they will also think that that is a good thing.)
So, IMO, it's mostly power politics. But I hope that Keystone doesn't get built; I truly believe it is not the kind of energy investment that we should be making. Transforming our economy to a sustainable basis is a big job, and we are overdue in getting serious about it. Keystone would be a big step backward.
I feel we need the pipeline for the jobs it will create and the impact on the economy. Granted there have been or are some environmental concerns and they need to be addressed if they already have not been. This piple line project has been in the planning stages for years and to reject the project after years of data has been collected does not make sense.
Several states have established agreements related to the route of the pipeline and based on the information everything was in place it only needed to be approved. I agree that we need to look at alternative sources of energy and I was happy that some nuclear energy plants have been approved. Developing alternative energy resources is years in the future and use of the piple line would enhance and boost the economy.
I understand the focus of environmentalists to some extent in wanting to make sure there are ample protections and/or plans to deal with any environmental problems. Limiting the use of our own natural resources is counterproductive to energy independence. We need to allow the development/construction of the pipeline before an agreement is made with China which is in the works from news reports.
We also have a large deposit of oil and gas reserves of our own yet the use of these reserves has been hampered by many things not the least of which is government red tape and environmentalists.
by Credence2 10 months ago
Keystone Pipeline spills 210000 gallons of oil?This one is a problem and why I am POed over this holiday season. Obama was wise to withhold support for the pipeline in recognition of just such an outcome.Where are the permanent good jobs that were to result from our participation in the project...
by Inventurist 5 years ago
Did China pressure Obama to back off Keystone Pipeline and disquise it as favoring his base?The "Greenies" all wanted to stop the Keystone Pipeline. China wanted the oil and told Obama to back off. Obama has covered his being slapped down by making it appear he would cave to his base....
by retief2000 4 years ago
Obama's wars for oil, is this just the latest?Libya, Yemen and now Iraq/Syria - is this just the latest war for oil that Obama is waging? Libyan oil supplies Italy and France, the war there was to protect that flow. Obama destroyed Qaddafi just to replace him with something worse. Is Syria next and...
by road2hell 6 years ago
Gee, the easiest solution to our energy crisis and dependency of foreign oil, is to grow our own oil! Hemp oil can run our vehicles, you can make plastics out it, and you can make flour, breads and our nutritious foods. And it won't effect our food crops like biofuels do, causing large...
by Brad Masters 2 years ago
What are your thoughts on the Keystone Pipeline?
by ahorseback 2 years ago
But where is Obama's leadership with denying it's construction ? . Isn't he promoting OPEC over the US ! What about the safe transportation of crude oil ?Will that remain on trucks and trains ?Which is ultimately safer ?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|