In what world does this make sense?
I have two parts to this question:
1 - In what world does racism mean making sure voters are who they say they are?
2 - Doesn't the fact that Democrats are fighting against an ID law mean they are concerned about losing votes that shouldn't count?
It has nothing to do with that. You're totally twisting the issue. The problem is that a lot of the people affected don't have IDs, like passports or drivers licenses. This is mostly due to financial roadblocks, making them unable to pay the fees for a passport or afford the driving tests. These voter ID laws have been put in place to target poorer individuals, which, incidentally, happen to be some minorities.
If anything, it's Republicans who are benefiting from these restrictions, snuffing out hundreds of thousands of votes that would otherwise go against them.
It doesn't cost that much for someone to get at least a photo I.D card.
You are right, chevyssbowtie. Virtually anyone can get a photo ID inexpensively.
In Indiana a legal ID is available through Bureau of Motor Vehicles at no charge. That is not sufficient to satisfy those who pretend it isn't about vote fraud. As a victim of vote fraud I can tell you that poll workers couldn't care less about laws
It's not racist at all. Racism is the term thrown out every time the left doesn't like a law. It works well so they use it for just about everything.
The first argument against this is that there a very few documented cases of in person voter fraud. Well, clearly if you're not checking the identification to begin with, then you'll never be able to prove it. The political left likes to refuse to enforce laws and then tell you that there is no evidence of a crime taking place. I guess if we didn't prosecute murder, then we would have a very low homicide conviction rate as well. So we should just ignore the fact that there are counties that have more votes than registered voters. The truth is that voter prosecution data reflects reality about as much as the number of prosecutions of kids drinking under 21 demonstrates how many have actually had an underage drink. I am not saying it's as pervasive. Only that if you consciously choose not to aggressively prosecute something, than your data on documented cases is greatly flawed.
The second argument is the inability to obtain ID. First of all, in most states the cost to obtain an id even if you don't drive is less than $20 every 7 years or so. But many have proposed giving the ID out for free to combat the argument that it's not affordable for some. Keep in mind that it's illegal under Federal law to open up a bank account without proper ID for the last decade. I tend to wonder just how many of them have a savings or checking account to deposit things like Social Security checks or to pay a bill. If you can afford a cell phone which are everywhere in the poorest neighborhoods, you can afford an ID.
Another common argument is that these proposals pop up just before an election to surprise people. That assumes that only Democrats would be surprised by a new law. However, in this recent case you have this being applied well before a major election, and giving plenty of time to the potentially disenfranchised to prepare for this requirement.
The reality is that it makes perfect sense to verify who is voting, and that they're eligible to vote. The only reason why anyone would be rationally opposed to this, whether they admit it or not, is they think their preferred candidate is likely to benefit more from whatever potential fraud is out there more than those they oppose. But they will come up with the most ridiculous excuses about why it is so difficult to complete the simplest of tasks.
by sunforged 6 years ago
Disenfranchisement Movement?Must have had my head in the dirt or clouds or something, but this topic is new "news" to me. Today I have read reports from Rolling Stone, 3rd party Think Tanks, Non Partisan Watchdog groups and many many traditional news sources.So has it been mainstream news...
by jdmanista 6 years ago
Are Voter Identification Laws Discriminatory?States like Texas, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania have been sued for enacting "strict" voter identification laws requiring photo IDs to receive a ballot in an attempt to fight voter fraud. Opponents so that these laws "disenfranchise minority,...
by Judy Specht 6 years ago
Why don't I have to show an ID to vote for president or anyone else?I have to show an ID to any policeman that asks, to get a prescription,see the doctor, get my blood drawn, board an air plane, get my taxes done, write a check, accept a job, withdraw money at the bank and sometimes when I use a...
by The Medicine Man 3 years ago
Which Political Party Wants To Make It Harder For Citizens To Vote And Why?
by Joan Whetzel 6 years ago
What about the Photo ID requirent for voting?One side says it's necessary to prevent voter fraud. The other side argues that it's a form of disenfranchisement along the lines of the poll taxes. Which way do you lean on this issue and why?
by American View 6 years ago
Here is a quote from Holder, do you agree? Do you find it interesting that no one can get into the Democratic National Convention if they do not have a picture ID, but you do not need one to vote? “…some of the achievements that defined the civil rights movement now hang in the balance.”--...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|