|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Absolutely! A lot of people are broke bc of drugs. I've known several people in my life that was on welfare and was either slanging or doing drugs. . .pathetic.
It is my oopinion because of the statistics being higher they should under go random drug testing and if ever test positive they should be denied benefits and refered to a rehab, aa/na and or drug/alcohol counseling program b4 getting back welfare.
Actually, in the states where they did drug test welfare recipients, they discovered welfare recipients use drugs less than Americans in general do. Drug testing companies want you to believe otherwise because they'd like to get some welfare money.
Since it was a financial waste in the places it was tried, I think it's a waste of money. All they did was show that people on Welfare use drugs a bit less than the general population.
If everyone (including the politicians and law makers) is tested for drugs, then yes. But singling out a specific group of people to drug test is punitive and wasteful.
Besides the fact that people would have to be tested every day to make it accurate, it's really all a waste of time.
Where this has been tried it has cost more than it has saved and it has been found that people's delusions about the terrible lazy people on welfare are in fact just delusions. They don't use drugs at rates higher than the one's complaining about it.
Even if drug use where a problem, such policies are not a solution. The only way they would make sense as a solution is if the testing was meant to find those with addiction issues and then help them. Of course, this isn't ever the intent of such policies. Rather they are intended to punish users and take away their aid. But doing so is not some grand magic trick. People who already have problems aren't going to magically correct all of the issues in their lives. More than likely their difficulties will simply compound which might mean they turn to crime, end up in some other assistance program and/or burden friends and family, all things which overall cost us the same or more money and resources than the welfare cost in the first place.
Yes. In theory, this is the right thing to do. Doing it the right way is next to impossible. The bottom line is that we can't stop people from destroying themselves or abusing their families by doing drugs, but enabling them to do so is sad business. Forcing tax payers to enable them is criminal.
The federal government should get out of the welfare business and free local communities, churches, and individuals to help the needy in productive ways. A main problem with today's system is that a large number of recipients do not want to be accountable on the local level. They would have to be forced into it.
Efforts to help people who want to improve their lives can be successful. Rooting out corruption in the welfare system, including the welfare to work plan, so we can see more successes is an effort everyone needs to support.
by Peeples6 years ago
Why is it considered unconstitutional to drug test welfare recipients?With all the talk in the media they make it sound like it is a "Right" to do drugs. What part of doing drugs is in the constitution?
by JoLynn Potocki4 years ago
Do you feel welfare recipients should be drug tested? If so, why?Clearly from the image below, I'm personally against drug testing for welfare. In fact, I can't think of one good reason to support it. I'm not looking to...
by IDONO5 years ago
Who is more likely to vote? Unemployment or welfare recipients?Even though the number of people is far larger of welfare recipients, ( in some form ) I,m guessing more unemployment people will vote. I'm talking numbers,...
by Stacie L6 years ago
by iarnuoconadvertisementSaying it is "unfair for Florida taxpayers to subsidize drug addiction," Gov. Rick Scott on Tuesday signed legislation requiring adults applying for welfare assistance to undergo drug...
by ahorseback6 months ago
Bravo for them ! Too bad though , so many people's heads are going to explode we''ll have to send a hospital ship straight to Wisconsin .Thougts ?
by junko6 years ago
The poor, mentally ill and handicap are required to be drug tested before and after recieving public monthly stipens of a few hundred dollars. Should not city council all the way up to the president also be drug tested?...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.