Gun Laws/Safety. Do our current laws help to prevent loss of life and ensure the safety of others?
Hayden, Idaho -a 2 year old boy accidentally reached in his mothers purse, a weapon discharged and his mother was killed. Veronica J. Rutledge, 29, (concealed weapons permit) was shopping with her son & 3 other children when this incident occurred.
In a “civilized” society I can not understand the obsession to have guns at the airport, hip, bars/restaurants, etc. Gun laws should take into account public safety. While this is a tragedy, the incident could have resulted in the compromised safety of any shopper at Walmart that day. Do weapons owners have the right to jeopardize others safety?
Our current gun safety laws do not guarantee the safety of anyone; they were actually born out of greed, ignorance and hate. The only result of these lax laws will be the continue escalation in tragedies like the ones we read/hear about on the news everyday. Kids will continue getting killed out of negligence, domestic murders will continue to spike, cops will continue to be at risk, and the roads will be continually unsafe until the fat cats in Congress wake-up and tighten gun laws. This is what happens when we elect people to office that actually own the companies that make/sell the guns.
We live in a quasi civil society and anything else is a desired illusion. Carelessness, on the part of this women, as sad as this situation is, does not give your argument any credibility.
That one should fall on knife while running does not justify the banning of knives. That a child can start a car and back over a sibling does not justify the banning of cars.
Gun owners, knife owners, car owners do not have a right to endanger anyone anymore than legislation can ensure common sense and ban stupidity.
Sadly, our world is a violent place, from the constant threat and action of war to the pandemic use of drugs and the inherent violence of seller and user.
The scenario goes on to a failed education system, a failed family structure and more.
I would agree that guns are problamatic, but so are the assaults on good people.
When these on going, and seemingly increasing assaults deminish, then perhaps a conversation is needed and, I would think, welcomed by all.
Unfortunately laws do not help to prevent loss of life and ensure the safety of others (unless) people "obey" the law.
There are lots of areas which do not allow people to carry concealed weapons and yet many people elect to do so every day.
Commonsense (should) dictate one should not be carrying any type of weapon around children!
I guess commonsense is not so common anymore.
The incident you mention is a heartbreaking event that was caused by carelessness. The 2-year-old baby did not accidentally reach into the purse. He only did what people his age do. Weapons owners do not have the right to jeopardize the safety of others any more than drivers who drink have that right. If the woman had not been killed she would probably be in jail today and her child in the custody of others. Laws have never and will never make people always behave responsibly with common sense. The fault was not with the gun or the laws or the police or the baby or anything except the carelessness of this gun owner. Education on what responsible gun ownership is will help people understand the truth of the situation and make them able to ask the right questions when such events happen.
Your question, "Do weapons owners have the right to jeopardize others safety?" is misleading. For one thing, yes, most Americans have the right to own and carry firearms. Your mistake is in assuming that just because someone is carrying a gun they are automatically putting the lives of others in danger. You've heard the saying, "Millions of gun owners killed no one yesterday." This is a true statement.
Tens of millions of Americans own and carry guns, but the type of incidents you mention are comparatively few in number. I'm not making light of these tragedies, but if you want to be objective about this, you must take the statistics into account. Many lives are saved each year because Americans use guns to protect themselves and their families.
In direct answer to your question, yes. I think the current laws do a decent job, but the real reason for these tragedies is not the laws, but the individuals themselves. Personal responsibility is the most important factor with gun safety.
For instance, you mentioned the 2-year old boy who shot his mother. I must ask why she had a round in the chamber while it was in her purse? And did she have the gun in a safe holster or was it loose in her purse?
You cannot eliminate all gun deaths, but there are many ways to minimize them without stepping on the People's rights.
A person carrying a weapon should have mastery over that weapon at all times and nobody else should be able to get a hand on it. Anything less is irresponsible.
Personally, I think purse carry should be illegal. It isn't a very secure carry method and is too easy of an item to set down or have snatched.
This is not an accident. It is carelessness, and carelessness with firearms is dangerous. Case in point.
Ultimately, everyone running around with deadly weapons is a poor solution, but if people are going to be running around in such a fashion, our laws should ensure that they are responsible and trained. Obviously they fall way short of that high of a bar.
RIght-to-carry states are interesting studies, particularly when comparing crime rates with other states. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cr … 0tbl20.xls
by flacoinohio 5 years ago
Do you believe modifying the Second Amendment is going to prevent mass acts of violence?This questions is for all of those situational or sunny day anti-gun advocates. Pro-gun advocates spend a lot of time and effort, not mention millions of dollars protecting the Second Amendment. If...
by Michele Travis 5 years ago
Some people already have a lot of guns. So if gun laws are passed, how will the government actually get guns away from people. Some guns are registered and some are not, how could the government find out, and how could the government actually take guns away from people?
by nightwork4 6 years ago
Why do you think that gun laws don't help with crime?The U.S. has some of the least strict gun laws but an extremely high rate of murder compared to other countries, why is that ?
by Michele Travis 5 years ago
The White House had said Mr. Obama would in the coming weeks seek stricter gun-control measures but hadn't provided details until today. Mr. Carney said the president would consider limits on high capacity magazines and would support efforts to prevent people from buying guns through unlicensed...
by tobey100 7 years ago
Now that the left is beginning to realize the mantra of 'conservative vitriol' isn't working regarding the tragic events in Arizona 60% plus don't believe the template set forth by the media), they've gone to page two; tougher gun laws. I've been in law enforcement for 25 years and the very...
by Stclairjack 5 years ago
1) i have no problem banning the civilian ownership of fully automatic weapons (already illegal, has been for years, so its like me saying have no qualms with the sun coming up in the morning)2) i have NO problem banning the import, manufacture, or sale of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds,...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|