|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Do you think freedom of expression is misusing under certain cases?
Why people of both sides (arguments and defends) are claiming they each of them have their freedom of expression?
Everyone has the right to express their opinion, as long as they are not calling for harm of someone else or destruction of their property.
Both people have the right to express totally opposite opinions. And even mocking and criticizing someone is in their rights.
Hate speech charges are actually a destruction of free speech. One side says our views our love, so their views are based on hate, hate is bad and they are bad, if they disagree with us it is because they want to hurt us, silence their speech because we think it is an attack or call for one. Now you have fascism, where whoever is politically powerful can say silence the speech of those we disagree with because we can say their views are hate, ban it. This is why calls to end hate speech are so evil - it is fascism in the name of feelings.
And when people cannot have social change through open debate, you only leave the option of violence.
In the European Union (EU) ‘Freedom of Speech’ is a Legal Right, subject to the usual legal restrictions such as slander etc. These rights to ‘Freedom of Speech’ are enshrined under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
However, under EU law it is also recognised that with the ‘Right’ to ‘Freedom of Speech’ comes ‘Responsibility’ e.g. as covered by the ‘Hate Speech’ laws specifically to prevent incitement to violence against minority groups e.g. Jews, Muslims and homosexuals etc., who tend to be the more vulnerable sections of Society and who (in a responsible society) need legal protection against prejudicial discrimination. The laws governing ‘Responsibilities’ on Freedom of Speech are there specifically to discourage things like racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and intolerance against Muslims, through incitement to hate.
Specifically, in the United Kingdom, it’s a Criminal Offence under hate speech laws to make communication which is hateful, threatening, abusive, or insulting and which targets a person on account of disability, ethnic or national origin, nationality, race, religion, sexual orientation, or skin colour.
However, I am aware that many outside of the EU don’t understand our ‘Hate Speech’ laws and view it as a ‘gaging’ of free speech; whereas in actual fact it’s not. The laws are there purely to protect the vulnerable against prejudice and incitement to violence resulting from hate speech; and are not there to gag one side or another from expressing their views. Keeping within the laws, while expressing your views isn’t that difficult (unless of course you are xenophobia or racist), it’s just a case of choosing your words carefully so as not to incite hatred. And the bonus is that people of opposing opinions can have a more productive civilised debate rather than a destructive shouting match.
All debates in the British Parliament are televised and freely available for viewing on YouTube, so to see how civilised political debates can be, as MPs use their Freedom of Speech responsibly (and with respect), you only need to view the videos published on YouTube.
Happy to see a comment from the celebrators of freedom of speech. I always admired with some of the European Zone ideas. They gives more priority to human values. I used to saw videos of Oxford Union debate, where the freedom of expression can see
Thanks, yes I am proud that European philosophy is to put people before profits.
by ptosis15 months ago
Should certain forms of art, political cartoons be banned?
by Michael Collins aka Lakemoron5 years ago
Today we are seeing a movement toward tolerance or at least what we think as tolerance. Bulling has become a hot button issue in the public (as if it didn’t happen anytime before) with many different groups against...
by ngureco3 years ago
Where do we draw the line between free speech and hate speech for text we print on Facebook?
by weholdthesetruths7 years ago
is a right mentioned in the 1st amendment. Quoted here: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the...
by EncephaloiDead4 years ago
We know that freedom of speech often allows hate speech and we know that more reasonable and rational speech combats hate speech. Should freedom of religion provide protection for religious hate speech in the same way?
by Earl S. Wynn6 years ago
Is it violating a person's right to free speech if I delete vicious hate comments?Is it violating a person's right to free speech if I delete vicious hate comments posted on my articles, youtube videos, blog posts, etc?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.