Is this proof that Hillary controls the National Media & thinks voters are idiots?
Hillary Clinton won the Democratic nomination but about 8 print newspapers shot Bill Clinton under the title "Clinton wins nomination". I think this is proof that voters are considered "idiots who don't know there is a 2 term limits on Presidents" & trying to fool voter to thinking that they are voting for Bil and not Hill
Hillary doesn't control the national media, any more than Donald does. I think this is more likely a combination of the fact that she wasn't in attendance the evening Bill spoke (in the photo showing her, she's on the overhead screen), and the mindset of the misogynistic idiots who put Bill's photo on the front page, when it's so clearly HER time, not his.
Only a moron would think that Bill Clinton is running for president this year.
I am copying and pasting the picture you posted for this question. The Wall Street Journal on the left does show Bill Clinton's picture, but clearly says "Hillary Clinton Wins Nomination." The Wall Street Journal on the right shows a picture of Hillary Clinton and says "Clinton wins historic nomination." However, even if a newspaper listed Bill Clinton's picture on the front of the paper and just said "Clinton wins nomination," at this stage of the ball game if any voter is confused as to who is running for President representing the democratic party that voter has more issues to worry about than a newspaper trying to trick them. In addition many papers are using the term "historic" nomination because she is the first woman to win nomination from a major party. Nothing would be historic for a white male to win a nomination. So I do not think any paper (except maybe a spoof paper like the Onion) would think anyone would be fooled into thinking Bill is running again. Also, Hillary does not control the media and if she hypothetically did control the media I would think she would have used it to handle the reporting on Benghazi, Emails, Bill Clinton's affairs, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's running of the DNC, issue regarding Bernie, used it more to put down Trump rather than have people think they are voting for Bill Clinton.
I think it is a bummer that we can discuss that any significant portion of American voters could be led into confusion on this. But it is common lingua in the US to refer to someone with their last name when running for office.
With all this said I think you might have a valid point that both Clintons and the media think we are idiots. Would I be wrong to think it is aimed at people with English as a second language? I could see them missing the nuance.
by Susie Lehto 20 months ago
* http://constitution.com/trump-leading-6 … 00-voters/ App maker: Trump will win election!* http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2016 … /88640044/"What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying "The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote...
by fishskinfreak2008 7 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162- … ?tag=stackJust like SARAH PALIN and the rest of the Tea Party, Christine O'Donnell has one objective/one idea to get attention: BLAME
by John Wilson 11 months ago
Clinton supporters - what would it take for you to NOT vote for the Hillary? To accept Trump?All the accusations about Trump that are now coming out, just weeks before the election. Not a coincidence. Even the mass media admits a bias against Trump and a love for Hillary. Doesn't it bother you ,...
by Susie Lehto 20 months ago
The New York Times is one of the mainstream news outlets that has gone further left-wing than the others with out-right lies, so I am wondering how they will cover this story. They cannot keep covering up for the Clinton Crime Family and save face. This is a good report by the NYP. ...
by DonnyBoy 7 years ago
Why do many feel black-on-white crime is being hushed by the National Media?A white teen named Brian was called racial names and finally attacked and beaten by a group of black teenagers the other day. He feels it happened because he is white dating a black girl.The boy's father opinions said what...
by John Wilson 21 months ago
How can Hillary be "for" women when her husband is a womanizer who's lied throughout their marriage?I find it odd, that so many women are for Hillary Clinton, when her husband is accused of being a rapist and of having numerous affairs.Hillary always says the accuser is lying, though...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|