Is it fair to admit Charles Manson to an out of prison hospital under "John Doe?"
According to the LA Times, Charles Manson was admitted to a hospital outside of prison in Bakersfield under the name John Doe earlier today. Other sources have suggested its a gastrointestinal problem. Clearly the name obfuscation did nothing to keep the incident out of the press. Is it fair to withhold his name from the medical personnel working on him? What information should be given to them and what should be withheld?
I don't think any hospital should need to know his name. It is our court's job to "punish" people and the hospital's job to treat people, even if they are crappy people. Chances are he isn't too hard to recognize anyway. So yes, it is fair, because their job has nothing to do with who the person they are treating is. They need his medical records, that is all.
by Wayne Brown7 years ago
Given O.J. Simpson and Charles Manson. Which one would you rather interview and why?
by Susan Holland4 years ago
Should Charles Manson have been put to death when he was sentenced?If the death penalty had been allowed in California when Charles Manson orchestrated 9 deaths, do you think he should have been put to death?
by Susan Holland5 years ago
Do you think Charles Manson should be paroled?Manson is up for parole. Do you think it should be considered? Is he still a threat to society?
by ahorseback5 months ago
I just read about one article describing the death of Charles Manson 83 , Finally I thought ......... This article explained that the cost of incarceration to California was somewhere...
by SwordofManticorE5 years ago
Can anyone tell me how an all knowing, loving God would create a place called hell to cast most of His creation?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.