Democratic Michael Avenatti Arrested for Domestic Abuse ?

1. 0

   Ed Fisherposted 6 years ago

   There goes one more prince of the democratic party ! The hero of the resistance , the king of the Never Trumpers , the god of # Metoo ..........and many here's knight in shining armor ?

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Aime Fposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Really? Hero? King? God? I think you may be severely overestimating how much anyone ever cared about this person, but leave it to you to amp up the hysterics.

      replyreport
   2. 60

      Live to Learnposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      In fairness, I think avanatti gave himself those titles.

      replyreport
   3. 0

      promisemposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Kavanaugh was innocent until proven guilty, which is why he is now on the Supreme Court, so the same rule applies to Avenatti.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Ed Fisherposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         Yes , However Which one was arrested for domestic assault ?

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Live to Learnposted 6 years agoin reply to this

            That comment would never have been made were Avanatti a Republican. Innocent until proven guilty isn't even thought of until it's someone on the left being accused.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               promisemposted 6 years agoin reply to this

               I'm getting confused about what makes up "vitriol" by the right -- it doesn't seem to exist on here according to some people -- versus vitriol by the left. 

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  Live to Learnposted 6 years agoin reply to this

                  When I get off work, I'll review your comments on the Cavanaugh conversation. If you were saying innocent until proven guilty there, I'll come back and apologize for the comment here.

                  replyreport
                  1. 0

                     promisemposted 6 years agoin reply to this

                     From the Kavanaugh debate:
                     
                     You: "Allegations which were immediately walked back. You are proving the point that this man's name was smeared."
                     
                     Me: "You misunderstand me. I'm saying he was innocent because he wasn't proven guilty, which is why he got on the court. Nor was he smeared because his accusers weren't proven guilty either."
                     
                     I'm not looking for an apology. I would simply like the level of civility we recently reached on a few other issues like the synagogue massacre.
                     
                     https://hubpages.com/politics/forum/341 … tements---

                     replyreport
                     1. 60

                        Live to Learnposted 6 years agoin reply to this

                        Thanks for doing that research. If you are an innocent until proven guilty believer.... I'm happy to have a kindred spirit. I won't say I didn't laugh when I heard avanatti had been arrested but I don't assume him guilty either. However, if it is just a b.s. complaint, it's fair play... after his antics. It's even funnier.

                        replyreport
                        1. 0

                           promisemposted 6 years agoin reply to this

                           Well said.

                           replyreport
         2. 0

            promisemposted 6 years agoin reply to this

            Your point being what? That an arrest means he is automatically guilty?

            replyreport
      2. 96

         Readmikenowposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         Do you think it is worth mentioning that Justice Kavanaugh was never formally charged with anything?  That is not the case with Michael Avenatti. I agree he is innocent until proven guilty.  I also believe it is important to point out Kavanaugh was never arrested for anything.  The public allegations against him were unproven and unsubstantiated. They are two very different situations.

         replyreport
   4. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Ed Fisherposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         You gotta laugh at that one !

         replyreport
2. 0

   Ed Fisherposted 6 years ago

   Just pointing out facts as usual Aime . Had he and Stormy been successful in an impeachment cause , you'd all have been  happy hypocrites .

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Aime Fposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Oh Ed, you wouldn’t recognize a fact if it grabbed you by the genitals.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         promisemposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         I hope for Ed's sake that such a thing doesn't happen.

         replyreport
      2. 0

         Ed Fisherposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         Aren't you mature ?............Not

         replyreport
3. 0

   Ed Fisherposted 6 years ago

   For me , the most obvious and actually humorous is the hypocrisy embraced by the left , from this point on there will be no Avenatti in the DNC gossip circles .   Who'd have ever dreamed such bottom feeders would placate the news media for so long , porn stars , greasy attorneys and  Hollywood's opines like Robert De Niro's vulgarity , Kathy Griffin's bloodsport ?
   
   A new day in defining reality ?

   replyreport
4. 0

   Ed Fisherposted 6 years ago

   It's laughable when democrats demand impeachment over a rumor but demand proof when one of their own is compromised by actual arrests!
   
   Hypocrites by definition .

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Randy Godwinposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Liberals bad....Conservatives good.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Ed Fisherposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         No , Conservatives good ,liberals just hypocrites ,

         replyreport