WHAT? THERE'S MORE?
We are strictly forbidden to mention perceived problems in select counties in states known as "battleground states." A battleground state is one that history shows could go either way.
With other states across the country performing according to form, if one can affect the outcome in these battleground states, one can win the big prize. And one just has to influence the outcome in a few select populous counties WITHIN these states to capture the whole state.
Who knew?
Obviously, somebody knew. On the night of the main voting event, around 11 pm, with Candidate T well ahead, the counting supposedly stopped, and the world went to bed.
The next morning, when the world woke up, Candidate B had surged ahead in all of these battleground states, and the snooze media had no hesitation in calling a victory for Candidate B. Nothing to see here. Time to move on. Suspend all disbelief — end of the story.
OUR SECRET
Don't tell anybody, but I'm going to describe exactly how this was accomplished, right under our noses.
Imagine, if you will, a political party that considers itself so important and beneficial in its beliefs that it would be a CRIME for them to not be in power.
Under this dictate, anyone who OPPOSES them is automatically considered a criminal, a domestic terrorist. It's now just a matter of imagining all of the crimes that these opponents MUST be committing and then broadcast loudly and widely these imagined crimes.
How do they know, with such certainty, what these crimes of their opponents are? Good question. They just go through THEIR catalog of crimes that THEY regularly commit, and, voila, they have an endless selection of crimes to pin on the opposition.
EXAMPLES
#1. In 2015, Hillary C. contracts with foreign operatives to produce a "Russian dossier" containing embarrassing things that her opponent has supposedly done. This is actual "collusion" with Russia. Nothing in the dossier turns out to be true, but that doesn't matter. It serves as fodder for her partisan media and loyal following to chew on.
Based on this, it's now easy to accuse her opponent of the crime of "colluding with Russia," and a Special Counsel is appointed to investigate and provide evidence of this collusion.
In two years of searching by the very best cut-throat lawyers in the business, zero, nada, zilch can be found of an indictable, criminal nature, but that does not disturb the "fact" of its having occurred if you're suspending your disbelief.
#2. It's discovered that a certain Vice-president, in his own words, on video, has threatened a foreign government to withhold a billion in U.S. aid if they don't fire a certain prosecutor investigating illegal activities of a company the VP's son happens to be on the Board of. The prosecutor is subsequently fired, and the money is delivered. It's called "quid pro quo." You do for me, and I'll do for you.
Based on this occurrence, the Prez from the other Party is then IMPEACHED for asking the head of said foreign government to take a look at this company, and the possibility of corruption and THAT is called a quid pro quo.
What is an obvious crime of corruption by the D Party candidate, is then transferred over to the R Party candidate who did NOT commit such a crime? More tasty munchies for the partisan press. Brilliant!
