|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Lot of hubs on terrorism and replies do seem to be on the side of the State. So it got me thinking, given that so many countries are guilty of sponsoring terrorism is this any worse or different to rebel groups of terrorists fighting in their own country or organising a bombing campaign against countries they view as the enemy?
It's all about control isn't it?
The US has its hands dirty all over latin/south america, the UK has undertaken covert ops in Ireland and historically in India. Germany, Russia, Spain, Italy, Portugal and France have all been involved in sponsoring ilegal activities in europe, asia and africa. Yet the word terrorism is rarely mentioned in the history books?
I don't see a clear distinction here. Does that make me a terrorist sympathiser or a dangerous subversive?
That's because the actions in Latin America, Asia and Africa have been military in nature. That is to say that the intent was to force a regime change or some other even that was supposedly in the "national interest" of the nation involved. The only goal of a terrorist is to strike terror into the hearts of a populace.
A regime change? That's an interesting concept and I'm wonderiing what exactly does this mean?
And implementing a regime change in a foreign country by funding and supporting an army to kill its own people because a democtratically elected govt might not favour your own country is not an act of terrorism?
Allende of Chile springs to mind as does the relentless actions taken by the US to destasbilise Cuba.
The National Interest of whom?
Obama wants you for his next apology tour.
Did I step on a landmine here?
Or did I fart at a Royal Wedding?
You Wok It Out.... Sorry kitchen humor
Maybe you put your worst foot forward Huh?
I guess people Were Wondering if you were expecting to get your digit amputated or....
I don't think you are right in suggesting that the UK has been in any way involved in state sponsored terrorism in Ireland.
Of course the UK government has been involved in the conflict in Northern Ireland, but as the actual government of that country, not as a foreign power sponsoring terrorist groups.
You need to read up a bit more on Irish history and the UK's interfernce in the democtratic process from the early 1900's. The IRA was founded as a protest movement to English interference in their affairs. And if you think that no covert operations exisited during the conflict then you are delusional my friend.
The collusion between the Northern Irish police force and known loyalist terrorist is well know and the UK govt approved and acknowledged this union. This was state spnsored terrorism.
Its easy folks , if it's the other guy thats fighting it's terrorism, if its you , you're gorilla fighting , easy.....
by cooldad3 years ago
I can't help but wonder if the United States could be considered a terrorist nation. With its actions in the past and the present, can the U.S. be considered terrorists?The treatment of Native Americans, slavery,...
by Jack Lee5 months ago
A personal analysis of the current state of the Democratic party which has been taken over by extreme liberal progressives like Elizabeth Warren...They demonize Conservatives and mock them and spew lies about them.They...
by Steven Escareno7 years ago
In an effort to create more fun and unique forums for all of us to discuss, I found out hubpages had this little sub category "state sponsors of terrorism." yeah...who knew? therefore, why...
by Paula2 years ago
Within days of the attacks on Paris, the news is saying France is being merciless in their bombing of certain sites n Syria. The United States intelligence shared with them, so they knew where to potentially...
by cjhunsinger2 years ago
As the President of the United States continues to refuse to identify on going acts of Islamic terrorism with Islam; is his refusal to do so a direct or tacit approval or support for the religion of Islam and Sharia law...
by cooldad5 years ago
Now that we all have had time to reflect, was the United States war on terrorism valid?Or, did our instant gratification culutre, react to quickly based on emotion and fear?I think American people are easily led by fear...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.