Are Airport Body Scanners really necessary? Apparently not, because on 24 November 2010, the designated National Opt-Out day, the TSA simply switched them off to avoid embarassment and media attention, at airports all around the USA and let travellers go through without any body scans or pat downs.
So, how can they be "essential" for passenger safety?
Full article here . . .
Excellent question, because I don't think they are. I read an article today that now explains how someone if they wanted to could sneak a bomb in through the body scanners, by molding one to conform to his/her body shape.
I also read that it was Obama that ordered the body scanners to be placed. It seems to me decisions were made based on insufficient information. Also, it is based on the assumption that the government should control airport security and I'm not sure that is the best assumption. Airlines and/or airports competing with providing the best security would seem to produce better results. Maybe they would then do more pre-flight profiling.
I'm all in favor of a major airline offering to be the 'no-scan' - 'low-security' airline so the throngs of people who find security invasive at airports can breeze past non-existent check points straight to waiting planes. No TSA people pawing through carry-on looking for guns & knives. It's a safe happy world we live in - no one will do anything on MY flight.. right?
Can you quote a legitimate news source to verify this story?
The 4 full body scanners at Phoenix Sky Harbor airport were used throughout the weekend. I very much doubt the accuracy of the report you referenced, it sounds like just another blog inspired "fact".
Rick Mercer has a funny take on this:
http://rickmercer.com/Rick-s-Rant/Blog/ … ublic.aspx
Airport security is important and should be in effect 24/7. I don't believe the way they are currently implementing security is legal nor is it effective. I also believe that TSA does not believe it is effective and important to national security and they proved it by shutting down the body scanners and illegal full body genital squeezing for the holidays. It is purely an act of acclamation to convince people that it is necessary.
by Ralph Deeds7 years ago
FINALLY — A great alternative to body scanners at airports . . . The Israelis are developing an airport security device that eliminates the privacy concerns that...
by qwark7 years ago
Who gives a damn!Do 'em both!When I fly, I wanna know I'm gonna arrive alive!You?
by LailaK6 years ago
Many people agree and disagree with racial profiling. To put it in simpler words, if someone looks like a terrorist, for example, do you think he/she should be stopped and checked in the airport only because the person...
by Jason Matthews4 months ago
Should airports be able to hire private security to replace the TSA?Some are questioning the TSA's ability to properly screen travelers; many have had bad TSA experiences. Should there be alternative options to the TSA?
by Stacie L6 years ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New software for screening travelers at U.S. airports will do away with naked images, addressing a major public concern, the Transportation Security Administration said Wednesday.After complaints...
by sannyasinman7 years ago
Read this then decide. . . http://www.naturalnews.com/030100_naked … rport.htmlWhat do you think?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.