http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 … inion_main
I couldn't agree more! Unions across states bascially tell their government collaborators what's acceptable and that what they get. Then one state or another union uses that contract as precedent to establish a baseline for theirs. It's a self feeding money pump that eliminates the employer from the equation. This must end NOW!
Collective bargaining is NOT a "antitrust violation".
People are allowed to group together and stop working until their demands are met, so long as it is done non-violently, and each member is free to not participate if they do not wish to do so.
Also, those people can not prevent the employer from hiring scabs.
The employer, however, has the right to fire them all if need be.
Anything beyond these basic rights are simply property rights violations.
by Timothius5 years ago
Can an employer force an employee to not express his opinion about the company through contract?Is that a violation of Freedom of Speech/Expression?
by KC3 years ago
My husband was burnt at his place of employmenthe suffered severe burns at his place of employment, but it was not work related, because his employer had an old truck in the building that he and other employees would go...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.