http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/29/obama … portunity/
In spite of the outstanding success of the school voucher program and in spite of bipartisan support for continuing the program Obama will NOT pass this bill. He's on record opposing vouchers and disputing the facts of success if the program. Obama, as always, is gauging the political winds and isn't willing to do what everyone else knows us right and risk losing support of teacher's unions!
Open your eyes libs... it's all about power!
This is political spam and it is using the forums against the TOS because you are promoting your almost hubless self - for profit.
The sooner the mods shut you and the other spammers down the better.
No - the spam is definately you getting paid to flood our forums with your sewage.
Your posts as well as mine speak for themselves.
More hate mongering from our resident Obama basher? To bad Obama isn't a member of the site cause threads like this could easily be seen as personal attacks....
never mind...i guess hubbers are considering 'pay angle' is such posts too and if people are doing their job of posting 'anti obama' stuffs....well it is their work...
Really how so? Please explain how this qualifes as hate or a personal attack? I think your post is a personal attack on me and an attack on free speech!
I don't monitor individual user posts that closely so I can't say I've ever seen you launch a personal attack on Obama himself (just his policies and politics), but I have seen some rather personal insults launched at liberals, denouncing them as "evil", "sneaky", "hate-filled" and so on. As there are obviously liberal users on the Hubpages forums I wonder if this is within the TOS.
(Of course, I wonder the same about users who insult conservatives, rather than simply conservative policies.)
Fair point. But calling liberalism evil is hardly a personal attack, more of an opinion though I could see how someone might take it personally.
No, I don't think calling liberalism itself evil is a personal attack. I might disagree with it but people will disagree on politics and belief systems, it's inevitable. It's only when it degenerates into saying "anyone who believes ____ is evil" or "anyone who is a ____ is bad" that I consider it personal.
But think about it, you firstly label anyone who disagrees with you as a liberal, whether they are or not, and then you proclaim liberals to be evil!!
It doesn't get much more personal than that.
Sorry, when someone works to take.my property and my liberty I get angry and yes I believe people that espouse such ideas are evil. Still I have hope that they can be redeemed.
And what has that got to do with you claiming not to personally attack people?
I think you'll find that shouting at people that they are evil is counter productive! Try explaining why you think somebody is wrong and present a compelling argument for your POV.
In every case I have but its been ignored and the subject changed. Take this post for example its about Obama supporting unions to the detriment of childrens education... but what has it become another attack on me. Let's try to keep this one on point!
Do you not think it evil to put ones political ambition above the needs of children getting a good education? Can you not see how that is evil?
Really! The article does not say anything about supporting the unions to the detriment of children's education and neither does it attribute the move to political ambition!
Again, it is another example of copy and paste without bothering to understand what you are copying. How do you expect that to generate serious debate when you insult us with trash?
The white house is on record opposing vouchers. The teachers union opposes vouchers. You do the math. As far as political winds everything Obama does is about politics why else oppose a program both parties support? Why support ethanol when experts agree this is less efficient and less green than oil? Could it be to win favor with the farmers in Iowa?
Do you not think it would be worthwhile stating why the White House and the Unions oppose vouchers?
I mean, it might just be because they see them as divisive and plan something more all embracing.
Obama is a politician so it's a bit off to accuse him of doing his job, isn't it?
Ethanol may not be as efficient as oil but it is renewable.
They oppose them because it means less jobs for union teachers!
I don't want to have the ethanol debate here. 40% of our corn crop is being used for ethanol raising the price of food across the board.
by Beyond-Politics 9 years ago
With so much vocal an organizational opposition to President Obama and his policies (such as they are) after only 9 months in office, is such criticism warranted? Does the opposition reflect minority intolerance, or a fear of growing minority influence?
by Prophecy Teacher 10 years ago
THE OBAMA-AYERS CONNECTIONBy Dick Morris10.8.2008Published in TheHill.com on October 7,2008In the best tradition of Bill Clinton’s famous declaration that the answer to the question of whether or not he was having an affair with Monica depended on “what the definition of ‘is’ is,” Barack...
by SparklingJewel 6 years ago
this truly is a serious issue that does need to be dealt with. people will be at varying stages of the situation of being dependent on the scale of government help, but there is a lot that can be done to start to change it and help every one no matter where they are.I lived through being one of...
by Susie Lehto 21 months ago
More than 50 tomahawk missiles were launched from US Navy destroyers, targeting an airfield near Homs, the report said, citing a US official.More to follow..* http://www.itv.com/news/2017-04-07/repo … near-homs/Tell me it isn't so.
by girly_girl09 9 years ago
After posting my last thread on spite towards people in the public spotlight, I thought I should come out. So, here is a little overview of my political beliefs that I thought you might enjoy. I think that there is a LOT of misunderstanding of republicans vs. democrats, liberals vs. conservatives....
by Nick Lucas 7 years ago
Obama has been meeting behind closed doors with Union leaders over the past few days.....he is obviously a tool for them and needs to be put back in the tool box.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|