And just who is paying for this one. Thought we broke???
BOSTON – A federal agency approved a construction and operations plan for the Cape Wind project off the Massachusetts coast, clearing the way for work to begin on America's first offshore wind farm as early as this fall, U.S. Interior Secretary Kenneth Salazar announced Tuesday.
Approval by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement was required before construction of the proposed 130-turbine wind farm in Nantucket Sound could get under way.
The secretary said the Cape Wind project, which has already received other state and federal permits, could create 600 to 1,000 jobs and that nationwide the wind power industry had the potential for tens of thousands of jobs.
"The wind potential off the Atlantic coast is staggering," but the vetting process for projects to tap it is too drawn out, Salazar said at a news conference in Boston.
"Taking 10 years to permit an offshore wind farm like Cape Wind is simply unacceptable," and the Obama administration is examining ways to streamline the permitting process so it won't take so long, Salazar said.
Yet Cape Wind itself still faces hurdles.
Opponents have filed nearly a dozen lawsuits against state and local agencies designed to block the project, saying the turbines could harm the pristine environment of Nantucket Sound.
"It's a national treasure that should not be industrialized," said Audra Parker of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, who attended the event in Boston.
Developers of the 468-megawatt project also are still shopping for a buyer for about half the power the turbines are expected to generate.
Cape Wind Associates Vice President Dennis Duffy told reporters he's confident the project will find a buyer for the remaining energy.
He said that even though the energy produced by the wind farm could cost the average ratepayer an extra $1.50 a month on their utility bill, wind power is essentially exempt from the fluctuations in other energy markets. If other energy prices rise, wind power could be even more desirable.
"It's an important hedge with real economic value," Duffy said. "It's an active market where there is a long term shortage of supply."
In a statement, Gov. Deval Patrick said federal approval of the construction and operations plan meant the state was one step closer to benefiting from the clean energy and jobs that Cape Wind will produce.
"States up and down the East Coast are now looking to Massachusetts with envy as we launch this brand new American industry," Patrick said.
As many as 11 other coastal states are currently looking at developing offshore wind farms, including Maryland, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Delaware and Virginia. Massachusetts is also exploring the possibility of other wind farms near Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket.
The Patrick administration also is pushing for a federal loan guarantee for Cape Wind that they say could provide savings of up to 15 percent for ratepayers serviced by the wind farm.
In a separate announcement on Tuesday, the governor said his administration had requested that the federal government remove from consideration for wind farms offshore areas that have been identified by commercial fishermen and others as vital to the Massachusetts fishing industry.
A 2008 law requires Massachusetts utilities to obtain increasing amounts of renewable power and calls for 20 percent of their supply to be renewable power by 2025. The same law tries to make it easier for renewable projects to get financing by requiring utilities to seek long-term deals with them for at least 3 percent of their total demand.
Cape Wind opponents have argued that the project will pose an unnecessary burden for electric ratepayers.
The state's largest utility, National Grid, signed a deal with Cape Wind that the utility said will cost ratepayers $1.2 billion above the projected market price of comparable energy by the time it's done. Still, National Grid argues that the deal is a good price for the benefits it is receiving, including a uniquely large size for a renewable power project and proximity to an energy-hungry coast.
The state's other large utility, NStar, passed on Cape Wind, instead focusing on energy contracts with three smaller land wind farms that it said are a total of $111 million below market price.
The Cape Wind project will cost $2.62 billion to build, according an estimate from the Massachusetts attorney general's office. Developers say it will power 200,000 homes in average winds.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110419/ap_ … _cape_wind
Can you believe who one of the biggest donors to the stop-the-wind campaign is?
Bill Koch!! Who has a home over-looking Nantucket Sound.
Don't believe it do you? That he would be against re-newable energy do you? ahaha
Course, when HE wanted to put a dirty rig in the waters of the Bahamas...there was no concern for the environment then.
I just can't stomache people like him, really can't.
Cannot WAIT until the love of mammon is gone from our atmosphere.
Someone needs to post the video of the John Stewart video segment on this. It was hilarious.
by nightwork4 7 years ago
Would you try to stop a company from building a wind farm in your area?would it bother you because of the look of it or any other reason ?
by My Esoteric 2 years ago
In reading Federalist Paper # 36 on Taxation, I found the jewel that speaks to one of the main differences between today's Republicans and Democrats"...; and must naturally tend to make it a fixed point of policy in the national administration to go as far as may be practicable in making the...
by William R. Wilson 8 years ago
I got this in my email today. This is the sort of thing I hired Obama to do:Thoughts?
by Aya Katz 6 years ago
Which alternative energy source is more efficient and cheaper to maintain: solar panels or windmills?
by Susan Reid 5 years ago
Some positive news amid the negativity.Unless, of course, you are an oil and coal stalwart.What part excites you most?Concerns you?Renewables ramping up. With news of Keystone and tar sands and coal-crazy China, it's easy to think that renewable energy is going nowhere, but we'd be...
by Shil1978 6 years ago
Which renewable energy sources offer the most promise?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|