America is at a tipping point. Federal spending now exceeds tax revenues by $1.6 trillion a year. That means 40 percent of what Washington spends is borrowed. Washington must make drastic budget cuts now to preserve our freedom and prosperity.
The current debate over the debt limit and the 2012 budget gives conservatives an opportunity to make the case for restraining the debt—and for real cuts in federal spending.
Although many Washington politicians may be afraid to cut, you don’t have to be! Choose a cut to each of the following five wasteful federal departments or programs, and we will share responses with lawmakers and urge them to take control of federal spending before it’s too late:
Annual budget: $121 billion
Summary: Since the department’s creation in 1979, trillions of tax dollars have yielded declining test scores as American education has fallen behind many other countries. One expert recently testified: “It now costs three times as much to provide essentially the same education as we provided in 1970.” The more we spend, the less we get.
2012 budget: $5 billion
Summary: In the next decade, Obamacare adds $1 trillion in new health care spending, which will balloon the federal deficit by $500 billion and produce a crushing tax burden. But even after one year, Obamacare is already cited responsible for increases in insurance premiums, dropped coverage, and job loss.
Amount budgeted: $827 billion total
Summary: The stimulus not only didn’t reduce unemployment, as the President and Congress promised, but much of the money is being wasted. One project spent $500,000 and didn’t even create two jobs! Much of the money remains unspent—which means it can still be cut!
Annual budget for welfare and entitlements: More than $2 trillion
Summary: Washington bureaucracies are filled with preventable fraud, error, and theft. Example: Each year, 22 million Americans receive checks of up to $4,700 through the Earned Income Tax Credit, and almost one-third of these claims are fraudulent. Ten thousand or more dead people also received “stimulus” checks from Social Security. Medicare inefficiencies and fraud are even worse.
Amount budgeted: $244 billion
Summary: Federal workers average 30 to 40 percent more in salaries and wages than equivalently skilled workers in the private sector and they receive roughly three times the basic benefits, more job security, repayment of student loans, and more days off.
Submit your proposed savings on these five programs to The Heritage Foundation, and we will share it with members of Congress! Your input will support our case for cuts in other programs.
In addition, we will e-mail you a copy of your answers so you can share them with friends—and invite them to submit their cuts to Washington.
Together, we can speak with a bigger voice!
http://www.askheritage.org/how-would-yo … 2011_Brand
Cut it all! All we need is defense the rest if it can be eliminated!
I would vote for something closer to the reverse of this.
Of course... libs just want to be happy and enjoy life but they can't unless they can have a government that takes what they want from someone else and gives it to them... yes THAT'S freedom according to libs!
As much as it might annoy you, we are in a democracy.
Democracy doesn't mean wealth redistribution. As much as it annoys the libs we have a constitution.
If the people vote for it, that's exactly what it means.
The constitution protects us from the tyranny of the majority... we're a republic not a democracy. Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner.
If taxes were legally considered tyranny we would not be paying them right now.
Democracy has its flaws but looking after the weak, ill, impoverished, elderly and disadvantaged doesn't strike me as one of them.
I guess you have to live with that just like I live with bloated and wasteful military spending.
No one is against paying taxes or even a safety net for the poor. What we've created are unsustainable entitlements that we can't afford and if they aren't fixed NOW will bankrupt the nation leaving us with NOTHING, no safety net no help for the poor no military no government and no freedom! Is this what the libs are fighting for???
You libs really need to look at our problems objectively and stop pretending we can continue on without consequences!
What bankrupts the nation is deregulation, subsidizing corporations to not pay taxes and ship jobs overseas, and massive defense entitlements. And, actually...you are definitely one who is against paying any taxes and any kind of safety net for the poor, personally...you.
"Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner."
Heritage Foundation - can you get an more right-wing pro-Israel than that. Of course no mention of military spending. How could anybody guess? Who is who?
by preacherdon 6 years ago
Let's go back to our pre-1940 ways and end government entitlements to all, except children. Let's end AFDC, TANIF, and Food Stamps. Let's tighten up on disability claims and child support. Make people work again for their money/food. Work, what work you say? Well, they say necessity is the mother...
by Alexander A. Villarasa 4 years ago
The close to $450 million website, and the chaotic rollout of ObamaCare only re-enforces the now common perception that the president's major domestic governmental intervention is a massive failure. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.And like the iceberg that sank the Titanic, ...
by Marie Alana 5 years ago
What do you think of the recent federal money cuts?They have cut billions of dollars from the federal funding. How do you feel about this? What specific cut means the most to you?
by Petra Vlah 5 years ago
Through our working years we all paid for Social Security and Medicare, so why are they considered entitlements when in fact we contributed our own money into the system?
by crankalicious 7 years ago
If you got to balance the federal budget, what programs would you cut?Where would you start cutting? Medicare? Medicaid? Planned Parenthood? Social Security? Defense? Programs for the poor? Health care?
by SparklingJewel 6 years ago
...within his first three years as presidenthopefully they will run the numbers and see if it is so...http://www.politico.com/news/stories/10 … z1b2aMmbbo
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|