Stupid obvious studies that do little more than keep scientists, statisticians and bureaucrats busy are not the sole province of the United States government. Everywhere there is a giant government with huge sums of money and populated by arrogant liberals driven to make everyone live in their utopian vision there are massive stupid studies bolstering their claim at genius.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne … ation.html
We need to be more like Europe, they are so much smarter than we are.
It appears to me that they are banning sellers of bottled water from claiming that bottled water prevents dehydration, not claiming that water doesn't prevent dehydration.
As one who is convinced that bottled water holds no magical properties whatsoever, beyond perhaps the ability to extract large sums of money from the gullible, I find nothing wrong with them preventing the sellers of bottled water from making further silly claims.
Are they making the claim the water from any other source does not prevent dehydration? Is the claim that bottle water prevents dehydration false or deceptive? Is the EU populated by numbskulls who cannot judge whether their hydration requirements are or are not served by bottled water?
I think the suggestion is that the claim that bottled water prevents dehydration is deceptive in that it doesn't do it any better than any other water.
Is it waster? Does water prevent dehydration? If so than the claim is factual, unless the claim is that bottled water is superior or exceptional in the ability to prevent of relieve dehydration. So the EU has decided that a factual statement about the natural property of water even when bottled and sold is a crime and punishable by fine or imprisonment? This doesn't seem insane to you?
Probably best to read it for yourself and decide
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex … 003:EN:PDF
But do read the subtitle-
"refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods and referring to the reduction of disease
As usual, you have no idea what those of us who are proud to be called liberals think. No idea at all, so you continue to set up silly strawmen and blow them apart.
Do you never tire of being wrong?
Liberals seem quite incapable of sufficient introspection to see that it is indeed a utopian fantasy that they would impose. Introspection of that depth would end liberalism and so, to cling to the comfort utopia, liberals eschew enlightenment and choose their fantasy, instead.
The Europeans are not alone. We are in a race to the bottom with them. We are both on the lead lap.
Personally, I think this idiocy is in reading the Telegraph and relying in the content there in. You have studied the Torygraph's history and the EU, right? UCW?
Are the facts contained there in accurate? The mistake is believing that no good information can be gleamed from a source with which one might disagree. Given the impending collapse of the EU it doesn't seem that opposition to it as an unreasonable position.
by elielarrey 11 months ago
"Every 5 minutes in the U.S. over 2 million plastic bottles are used,Gone Un-recycled, these plastic wastes will take up to 1000 years to properly START decomposing. What about the adverse effects it has on our ecology?"Those heart punching details were summarized to me by a mentor...
by Brian 7 years ago
Is it just me or are there way too many brands of bottled water sitting on store shelves these days. I mean you walk into these supermarkets, and there are stacks and stacks of those packs of bottled water piled to the ceiling.I wonder what would happen if you took just one day, and went to every...
by Shil1978 4 years ago
Why is bottled water bad for the environment?
by lady_love158 6 years ago
http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2004/09 … -the-left/A very interesting take on this question written back in 2004 sheds some light on the term and perhaps will convince liberals that they are really tools of forces that have long desired to achieve the destruction of capitalism and...
by Castlepaloma 5 years ago
We all need licenses and insurance for a car, or home, even our dog and many of our jobs needs license and none were design to kill.About 80% of Americans own guns, but that's not enough. Do we really need more guns in circulation to stop mass shootings.There is 10 States firearm kill more than...
by nightwork4 7 years ago
Is bottled water really needed or is it just another way we have become lazy.it's less expensive and more enviromentaly friendly to use tap water but bottled water is a huge seller these days. should we be using it or are we just being lazy?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|