Those who are more knowledgeable than me (which is pretty much everyone ) can sort this one out...
"Yet Mr. Ross told me that he paid 102 percent of his taxable income in federal, state and local taxes for 2010. “My entire taxable income, plus some, went to the payment of taxes,” Mr. Ross said. “This does not include real estate taxes, sales taxes and other taxes I paid for 2010.” When he told friends and family, they were “astounded,” he said."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/102-tax-r … 10322.html
It may not be true but it is right. The only way he had money is because he had to take it from people poorer than him. Isn't that how it works. The poor people have all the money until somebody comes in and sneaks it out from under the floor boards and stashes it in the Cayman Islands or Switzerland. If it wasn't for people who should be forced to pay 100% or more of that money back the poor would be trillionaires. Right?!?!
Sounds true to me. Someone has to pay for America's wars. "U.S. Corporate Tax Rate Plunges To 40 Year Low Of 12.1%"
Well, the article came from the NYT, so it must be true. That amount of taxes is ridiculous! We have to reform our tax code!!
Are you saying that we have the same opinion of NYT?
I'm actually, really curious here.
I don't have a high opinion of the NYT, but most liberals do. I figured if the Times was reporting someone wealthy who pays A LOT of taxes, it has to be true.
So as the number of NYT subscriptions declines can we hope that one of two things is happening. One, liberals are budgeting their declining incomes more carefully in order to help Mr. Get the Money Out of Politics raise a $BILLION for his re-election bid. Two, and more desired, there are just that many fewer liberals.
If you subtract all your deductions from your gross income, you are left with your taxable income. Then you pay the tax on THAT.
Mr. Ross is suggesting that he is paying 102% because he is comparing his taxes to his taxable income, rather than to his total income.
Due to the alternative minimum tax, I believe him when he says he is paying 102% of his taxable income. But he is still paying less than his total income.
If it's true that people making over a million dollars get screwed like this, that is contrary to all the problems that are known about the tax codes.
As far as I understand it, people in that high income range take advantage of many loopholes that help them legally avoid many taxes. So this story just doesn't make sense.
I'd like to see an accountant chime in on this thread, and see what he or she says. Any accountants out there?
Something I just want to point out. People always talk about the rich taking advantage of loopholes, but those 'loopholes' are no different than middle-class Americans itemizing deductions, or lower-income people getting $4,000+ of EIC.
I'm tired of seeing the double standard where the rich are crucified for 'taking advantage' of the tax code, when some people make more on their returns than in a year of working by 'taking advantage' of the tax code.
If Democrats despise "loopholes" so much why do all of them seem to take full advantage there of. Also why do they act as if these same disgusting "loopholes" just spontaneously generate from piles of money. The majority of the tax code has been written and re-written by the Democrats in Congress. Tax simplification was the cry of Republicans as far back as Phil Graham and Dick Armey - who by the way authored one of the most equitable flat tax programs for the working poor one could imagine - killed by Democrats and weak Republicans.
It is ridiculous. There is no good reason for things to be as complicated as they are, unless it is to keep the lawyers and politicians employed.
Tax reform, budget reform(no more automatic increase), reduce government... we've got a lot of work to do.
And what has he won, Johnny Donovan?
A NEW CAR!!!!!! and a life time supply of rice a roni, the San Francisco treat.
Government exists for several purposes not the least of which is to eat the economy and get bigger. Government exists for those in it. This is the way governments have always been and will always be. That is precisely why we have a Constitution. You remember that document, the one politicians, lawyers, judges, journalists regularly wipe themselves with and we refuse to rise up and return to its place of reverence.
Wait... are you saying that the foundation of one of the greatest nations in history should be regarded as... I don't know... maybe a good thing?
I am saying there is no set of secular documents that should ever be held in higher regard than the foundational documents of The United States. Sure all the others can love their Magna Cartas and all but those didn't lead to the most sustained expansion of prosperity and liberty the world has ever seen. One event triggered that change, the American Revolution.
Yess, Yess, it was built on the Enlightenment but where that led to the guillotine, the American Revolution led to the "liberal" revolutions in the 19th century that restrained and rewrote the monarchical systems, relationships and powers all over the world.
Thanks Montesquieu, Locke, Burke, etc... nice ground work but you didn't quite get the foundation laid. That took Americans.
Wasn't it you guys who shouted "No Taxation without representation" well I guess the greater American public are now tax slaves to a much more elite group than King George represented!
Income tax is the wrong way to go, all taxation switched to purchase tax, with variable rates to account for basic good to luxury items is the way to raise taxation.
Legislation to tax assets transferred offshore would deal with the problem.
Just a thought.
I know less than you about taxes and skipped reading comments because no point. I still wouldn't get it. However, may get my genius financial-genius daughter to look at this out of curiosity. If she has anything to offer besides those offered when you wrote, she can do it.
by Stacie L 6 years ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is expected to seek a new base tax rate for the wealthy to ensure that millionaires pay at least at the same percentage as middle income taxpayers.A White House official said the proposal would be included in the president's proposal for long term deficit...
by Susan Reid 5 years ago
Wow. 500,000 households making more than $100K per year and 7,000 millionaires paid no income tax in 2011.Do they consider themselves "victims" do we suppose?Are they lost causes who will never "take personal responsibility and care for their lives"Excerpt followed by...
by karl 4 years ago
How many French millionaires will your country take?http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-2 … e-tax.htmlHow long do you think it will be before Frances economy will be on the big slide downwards?
by warden76 6 years ago
So, Mitt's taxes came out today...paying 13.9% this year. Oddly, he ended up paying more to the Mormon Church than he paid in taxes. Does it seem odd that somebody who has not paid into Social Security for years can comment on ending it? So...thoughts? Is this guy one of you? Do you still support...
by Jesusjohn78 2 years ago
Everyone hates the "rich" and I do not understand why. I was always under the impression the American dream was to become successful and stay successful? SO why are we always trying to punish the rich?
by Stacie L 6 years ago
We have already lost so much in the value of our homes, many folks considered their home value part of their retirement package.....and now this...... How many more hidden items are there hidden in this bogus health bill?When does your home become part of your health care? After 2012!Your vote...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|