Now they are proposing that our ever so efficient politicians and other government agencies should be able to snoop into who we are contacting at any time, by recording all our emails, Skype conversations and social network messaging on a database.
1) Total hypocrisy as both the Tories and Lib Dems opposed this when it was proposed by Labour in 2006
2) Guess what? Most UK citizens are not terrorists or criminals!
3) How long do you think it will take for some civil servant to lose all the information on a station one Friday night?
I am at a lose with pooliticians these days and this is just one reason why.Both parties were vociferous in 2006 when the goverment of the day proposed such a measure.
Only good thing is it cant be lost by a civil servant as they want the ISP's to keep the info the cost will no doubt be passed on to us the user's.
Hah! If they ever see me as suspicious and follow up my FB chat, they will find a lot of it is in Welsh, as I use FB as a medium in which to practice using Welsh. That means they will have to pay a translator to translate the drivel into English, which will help someone trying to earn a living in Wales most likely. Bring it on!
I think the time to get off our backsides and do something about our criminal governments is now.
Don't know if anybody is interested in this, or has already signed, but here is the link to the 38 degrees petition opposing the plan.
Don't know about you, Innersmith, but I'm sick of successive govermnments obsession with voyerism. As CMhypno eloquently puts it, we're not terrorists or criminals, so why the hell should we tolerate this form of intrusion into our private lives.
The way I see it, it is not okay to punish the entire population for a minority's sins. Even if you have "nothing to hide", there must be a point where government intrusion into your private life is unacceptable. We should all be outraged at this.
We need a revised version of the email that was suggested the last time this was spoken about. It went along the lines of "as I passed by the Bush outside the White House I saw a bin laden with plastic, explosive was I to see such devastation etc etc", or something like that.
Yep, we also need to put up the same kind of fight as we did in 2006, when this was last suggested.We beat them then...
Do you really think this lot will take any notice of what people want?
Ordinarily, no. However, they do have a reputation for caving under pressure. And, let's face it, they are not in a very good place right now.
Hm, didn't stop them blasting through the NHS in the face of almost universal opposition though did it?
No, but let's face it, that was about their personal profits and those of their cronies. I think, Cam the scam will have a Thatcher resignation moment sometime soon. I believe a man named Rupert may have pictures of him. What might happen then, though. Election, or another unelected slob?
I hope and I pray that he does, and please make it sooner rather than later, while there is still a bit left.
But then we'll probably get just another unelected slob.
Same old, same old. We have to keep opposing them, though.
I know. As an armchair activist, signing petitions and printing off leaflets, I often ask myself "what's the point?" but then, I think about my kids, the Palestinians, women in the congo etc. and think, even a small victory is better than none. If we don't fight for people who do not have a voice, who will? Besides, where would be without the likes of Pankhurst, Marx, Benn and the like. They didn't give up, did they?
Just seen the headlines from the Independent, BBC press preview. "Government forced to reign in snooping plan" Don't have details as yet.
Total sideline, but Tony Benn is 87 today.
I saw him last Thursday in a double act with Roy Bailey. Benn spoke and Bailey sang about class and other struggles in Britain over the ages. They were wonderful, and it was wonderful to see the standing ovation Benn received as he walked onto the stage. This was in Bristol, where they still remember his magnificent work as their MP.
If only Benn had won the Labour leadership election when he stood, I think Britain would be a totally different place now, regardless of which party would be in power. With Benn at the helm, Labour would have returned to its roots and offered a true alternative, which would have stood them well whether in government or in opposition.
Here, here. I have nothing but admiration for Tony Benn. One of the few politicians of integrity. I also think John Smith, had he lived, would have done a great job. Shame that the decent Labour politicians never made number 10. Still, despite his age, Tony Benn is very active and considered by many to be a heavyweight. Although controversial, and disliked by many with the Labour party, I feel that George Galloway stands for the same values as Tony Benn, and therefore, it's good news that he has taken Bradford west.
Wasn't it of Tony Benn that they said "the best prime minister we never had"?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 9 months ago
Americans, do you believe that the Democratic & Republican parties care for their constituents or do they care to advance their monetary holdings & furthering their own clout? Democrats & Republicans are both sides of the same coin sociopolitically. In reality, they will say...
by cwoodman207 12 years ago
Say we no longer have the right to bare arms. The government is doing a sweep collecting all registered firearms. Would you allow your right to go down the river or would you stand up to the regime and refuse? Either way give me some opinions please be honest.
by Ralph Schwartz 3 years ago
The government’s bill implementing the withdrawal deal has passed through both Houses of Parliament, meaning the UK will finally be leaving the EU on January 31st, 2020. For the duration of the debate, both sides have made bold predictions about the success of failure of the split. What...
by xXSweetiXx 11 years ago
Who is Big Brother, and Why Is He Always Watching?Not that I don't know, more a philosophical question, I suppose.
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
Will American society become even more totalitarian with the progression of the 21st century? The evidence is here. There is mandated covid 19 vaccinations. There is more governmental controls in society. There are more security measures a/k/a protections. Has...
by Scott Belford 4 years ago
Many people who call themselves Conservatives, IMO, aren't. Many people who Conservatives call Socialists, aren't. In studying politics, I ran across a couple of lectures which identified what the professor called minimal-state liberals (Libertarians) and active-state liberals (modern...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|