The different Aspects of Cohabiting: the Negative Effect of Cohabiting versus Marriage

Before you accept a request to cohabit with a lover as a prelude to (marriage) you should be aware of several issues concerning this all important step. There are many reasons why a couple might decide to cohabite such as, getting closer to each other , as a way of discovering each others strengths and faults because of the close proximity living.

The reasons might seem logical but have you considered the positive against the negative aspects of cohabiting? What is cohabiting and why do couples decide on this aspect of relationship especially when they feel its time to take it to the next level.

Cohabiting is when two people in a relationship decide to live together without marriage as live in lovers. Cohabiting is common in many countries and some believe it’s a definitive step towards marriage, and they favor the arrangement to test their comparability.

Unconfirmed statistics say that between 1970 - 1990 United States of America couples who adopted this mode of living resulted in marriage. This is a far cry in today’s reality, and the notion that cohabiting fosters stability, togetherness and understanding is an entirely wrong belief.

Why do couples decide to cohabit?

Couples have given many reasons why cohabiting makes sense especially if they have decided to progress to the next level, reasons given include compatibility test, sexual gratification, closer intimacy in preparation for marriage. Other reasons are a need to study the partner at close quarters, accommodation issues like maintaining one apartment instead of two, financial considerations and convenience.

Let’s take a closer look at these reasons

Couples who decide to pull resources to maintain a single apartment by cohabiting might share in the payment of rent and maintenance. But other sundry issue like maintain individual accounts and holding unto their individuality exposes the lie in cohabiting for financial convenience.

Married people pull their resources and finance for the good of the family unit contributing not only financially by having an emotional investment in the family’s future. Cohabiting couples don’t have this restriction except an agreement to share the bills and home maintenance.

Married couples also have the advantage of planning their future with an assurance that the partner is with them one hundred percent of the way. Even to the extent of having a joint accounts arrangement to meet their goals, dreams and aspiration.

Increased financial responsibility of married men makes them work harder and longer to meet family obligations giving them better pay than their single counterparts. The shared financial burden also provides more money between married couples against those cohabiting.

Shagging up with a love interest is entirely different from having a committed relationship that lasts a lifetime, without the element of marriage, true love, friendship and companionship- cohabiting is just sex. Cohabiting couples may argue that they have friendship, companionship and love but still hold tight to their single lifestyle, habits and individuality..

Men can profess love yet have sexual gratification with other partners without the emotional guilt of betrayal, after-all cohabiting couples don’t have legal boundaries that restricts having affairs except verbal commitment.

Statistics show that one in every three men cohabiting find sexual gratification with other partners despite having a live in lover.

Many women believe cohabiting would eventually lead to marriage this is an erroneous assumption, couples that cohabite isn’t a guarantee for everlasting commitment. Some women have found themselves in a difficult situation after giving there all for several years to find the man secretly married or marring someone else.

The man might have no intention of ever getting married and finds it convenient enjoying all the advantages of cohabiting without permanent commitment.

The negative effects of cohabiting

Most couples that cohabit separate after one year, while about a third who eventually get married might experience divorce after two years of marriage. Cohabiting has many negative aspects due to the nature of the arrangement.

Men who prefer cohabiting before marriage have radical views concerning marriage and might not be conformists and are unconventional in their thinking and behavior. They might not be bound by religious doctrines and morality making them less concerned about the institution of marriage.

Men restricted by religious principles and traditions concerning marriage are more likely to stay committed to a marriage that one without boundaries. Religion provides support, counseling, checks and balances that aids the couple weather the storms of marriage.

Non-legal

Because of the non legal aspect of the situation the couple is not bound by law and any investment in the union is purely by faith in the partner. Law suits are common place especially concerning property and even the custody of an illegitimate child.

The non legal aspect also reduces restrictions on each individual’s behavior and antecedents, has nothing binding them together, and the burden of responsibility does not exist in such arrangement.

Cohabiting couples tend to live separate lives and have separate friends and acquaintances making them more single than they think. Sometimes the families aren’t preview to this arrangement and even when they know does not regard the partner as family.

Separate leisure activity is common place in cohabiting couples and rids the couple of quality time and shared experiences. Cohabiting couples despite living together actually live separate lives form their partners.

Unwanted pregnancy

Cohabiting couples are sexually active and despite preventive measures might get pregnant with a child; the pregnancy is unplanned and binding even when the arrangement fails. Unwanted pregnancy is a serious concern with cohabiting couples and might have negative effect on a child in this unwholesome arrangement.

Having a baby while cohabiting doesn’t guarantee or neither increases the prospect of marriage, the child is left having emotional and physiological issues.

People living together without getting married sometimes experience bouts of depression because of the temporary nature of the arrangement. There is no concrete plan for the future and a lady might find herself living upwards five years without any change in the arrangement

Age is a very important problem

Women are susceptible to age related challenges linked to having children and the hope of getting a suitable husband if she wastes several years without getting married. Men might also waste many years with the wrong woman while his age mates have had children who might even have reached their teens.

In America, Europe and Australia cohabiting is commonplace and might have some advantages but weighted against the disadvantages the arrangement falls short. Cohabiting doesn’t guarantee future marriage, commitment, or exclusivity in the relationship.

Although there’s an element of comfort true partnership eludes such pairing because total commitment found in family units is absent. Other negatives are unwanted pregnancy, non legal aspect of the union.

Cohabiting might have temporary relief from single living yet the couple is actually two single individuals sharing the same space.